Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

QB Controversy

CPsinceDay1

By CPsinceDay1,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

CPsinceDay1 Proficient

CPsinceDay1

Posted
  • Author
Posted
19 minutes ago, Zod said:

TO sum things up, there is no QB controversy. The Panthers hope Sam can be a legit starting QB. The Panthers hope PJ can be a legit backup. 

You are God 🙏 on this forum so don't strike me lord...but

disagreement, typically when prolonged, public, and heated.
"the announcement ended a protracted controversy
There's still some who disagree Sam is a legit 1QB and some who disagree PJ is a backup QB...so technically there's still a QB controversy just not in the same context as many would believe....
Just my thoughts....
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Tinamedina Collaborator

Tinamedina

Posted
Posted
13 hours ago, Mother Grabber said:

even if we expand the list to include arena, which is not what PJ played in, but we’ll assume they are relatively equal, it’s still all of one player. saying PJ was great in the XFL carries as much weight as saying all 6th round draft picks will be as good as Brady.

They played in soccer stadiums. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
Posted
32 minutes ago, CPsinceDay1 said:

You are God 🙏 on this forum so don't strike me lord...but

disagreement, typically when prolonged, public, and heated.
"the announcement ended a protracted controversy
There's still some who disagree Sam is a legit 1QB and some who disagree PJ is a backup QB...so technically there's still a QB controversy just not in the same context as many would believe....
Just my thoughts....

A couple of numbnuts repeatedly blathering stupid bullsh-t doesn't equal "prolonged, public and heated disagreement".

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted

I'm not sold on Darnold being the answer but I am sold on the guy who went 32/56 for 368 yards 1 TD and 5 INTs last season NOT being the answer. PJ threw an INT on damn near 10% of his pass attempts. That's wild. That's nearly double the INT rate of any other QB with 50+ attempts last year.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I'm not sold on Darnold being the answer but I am sold on the guy who went 32/56 for 368 yards 1 TD and 5 INTs last season NOT being the answer. PJ threw an INT on damn near 10% of his pass attempts. That's wild. That's nearly double the INT rate of any other QB with 50+ attempts last year.

I'd have no issue trading for a guy like Jacob Eason but I doubt the Colts would accept what we'd be willing to offer, and I doubt we'd be willing to offer what the Colts would accept.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
mav1234 Grand Master

mav1234

Posted
Posted

I think PJs stats are deceptive and he could still be a good backup IF he can learn to protect the ball a bit better.  I like his energy and willingness to push the ball down the field... It was a stark contrast to Teddy.

Not sold on Darnold as long term solution at QB1, but I'm hopeful. He has the physical tools.  Only question if he has it between his ears to play smart.

No qb controversy in Carolina anyway. Just a couple of Huddle threads.  When there's real controversy... It's much worse hahaah.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Varking Grand Master

Varking

Posted
Posted
Just now, Mr. Scot said:

I'd have no issue trading for a guy like Jacob Eason but I doubt the Colts would accept what we'd be willing to offer, and I doubt we'd be willing to offer what the Colts would accept.

If we had kept Teddy I really wanted us to push for a guy like Eason, Minshew, etc. somebody low cost on a rookie deal with potential. But teams typically don’t move cheap assets.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CPsinceDay1 Proficient

CPsinceDay1

Posted
  • Author
Posted
3 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

A couple of numbnuts repeatedly blathering stupid bullsh-t doesn't equal "prolonged, public and heated disagreement".

We're sitting at 12pages, and look you still engaged in using foul language just to get a point across, which was once again wrong, like so many other things you try to stay on the fence about...

Cause you were so right about PJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CPsinceDay1 Proficient

CPsinceDay1

Posted
  • Author
Posted
5 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I'm not sold on Darnold being the answer but I am sold on the guy who went 32/56 for 368 yards 1 TD and 5 INTs last season NOT being the answer. PJ threw an INT on damn near 10% of his pass attempts. That's wild. That's nearly double the INT rate of any other QB with 50+ attempts last year.

If you can get over Darnold's past ..get over PJ's

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
Posted
Just now, Varking said:

If we had kept Teddy I really wanted us to push for a guy like Eason, Minshew, etc. somebody low cost on a rookie deal with potential. But teams typically don’t move cheap assets.

What makes Minshew at least something of a possibility is that Urban Meyer doesn't really have any connection to him.

The Colts drafted both of their backups though, so yeah...not likely to part with them easily.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CPsinceDay1 Proficient

CPsinceDay1

Posted
  • Author
Posted
3 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

I'd have no issue trading for a guy like Jacob Eason but I doubt the Colts would accept what we'd be willing to offer, and I doubt we'd be willing to offer what the Colts would accept.

Fitterer would disagree with you on that, oh he already has....

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • cookinbrak
      Canes/wolves vs Islanders 7pm

      By cookinbrak · Posted

      Ehlers needs to sit. Definitely can't lose him to a meaningless game.
    • toldozer
      Casual Sports Betting

      By toldozer · Posted

      Bet didn't hit because the referee missed 3 clear corner kicks. I had a 5k parlay that would have been alive tomorrow if he didn't miss those calls as well. Super annoying 
    • frankw
      2026 Charlotte Hornets

      By frankw · Posted

      I don't think it's at all a given that we have players who are good at driving the basket. I guess that depends on your definition. Bridges is 43rd in attempts in the paint Miller is 64th and LaMelo is 66th. We all love to see the lob threat but it's largely miniscule at this point in time. There's gotta be a solution here if LaMelo is to be the centerpiece because this is simply not sustainable if we want to continue to ascend. If he can't drive to the basket then that means we need to add another player to the core who consistently can. That would require moving someone like Miles Bridges. And that's certainly not going to be popular with LaMelo but something has to give here for what we are investing and we need to maximize guys like Miller and Knueppel on rookie deals while we still can. The three chucking is fine when it's working where the issue comes into play is there are no adjustments when it isn't and we just go into a shell and begin to look like the Hornets of yesteryear. That's why the offensive evolution of all involved is critical to us taking the next step. Getting to the play in is nice but we should have our sights set much higher. Right now though they need to take care of business against the Heat. All I ask is that they at least beat those fools. I cannot stand the Heat.
×
×
  • Create New...