Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Joe Brady


Shocker
 Share

Recommended Posts

38 minutes ago, Shocker said:

Haven’t seen much talk about him as OC.  He has a lot to prove IMO.  I haven’t seen a dynamic offense whatsoever.  Need to see some leadership and major improvements in play calling to say this guy is a decent NFL coordinator.  Second season will really tell the tale IMO.  Looking for more there personally 

I Bet Snoop Dogg GIF by chuber channel

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, ickmule said:

He’s average at best at this stage. So far I’m not impressed with the 2 Qb’s he’s sought. I’m not convinced Darnold will be much better than ole Teddy. 

has there ever been any report Joe Brady made the call for the these QBs….could be just as easy that these are just the guys the FO gave him to work with.  
 

If Joe Brady went around and got what he wanted….our drafts would look different.  Got to think same applies FAs too.  I mean he has input and I’m sure we have landed some dudes he wanted…

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can think of like 5 plays off the top of my head where Teddy fuged up in the red zone that had nothing to do with Brady. 
 

brady needs to get better situationally but I think that’ll come with more experience. He has a great scheme that is qb friendly. Hopefully Darnold excels in it. We have the weapons and a qb that can stretch the field. Hopefully it works.

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

As an OC Brady just needs to direct the offense to score points. It's very simple to judge. Leadership isn't the thing I'm concerned about. That's for a HC and players.

If you listen to the folks who know what they are looking at they see hints of a dynamic offense design. Now its time to progress towards executing it.

I'm almost indifferent to him but optimistic. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
    • adamantium? adam? adam thielen super bowl game winning catch ?
×
×
  • Create New...