Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Joe Brady


Shocker
 Share

Recommended Posts

38 minutes ago, Shocker said:

Haven’t seen much talk about him as OC.  He has a lot to prove IMO.  I haven’t seen a dynamic offense whatsoever.  Need to see some leadership and major improvements in play calling to say this guy is a decent NFL coordinator.  Second season will really tell the tale IMO.  Looking for more there personally 

I Bet Snoop Dogg GIF by chuber channel

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, ickmule said:

He’s average at best at this stage. So far I’m not impressed with the 2 Qb’s he’s sought. I’m not convinced Darnold will be much better than ole Teddy. 

has there ever been any report Joe Brady made the call for the these QBs….could be just as easy that these are just the guys the FO gave him to work with.  
 

If Joe Brady went around and got what he wanted….our drafts would look different.  Got to think same applies FAs too.  I mean he has input and I’m sure we have landed some dudes he wanted…

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can think of like 5 plays off the top of my head where Teddy fuged up in the red zone that had nothing to do with Brady. 
 

brady needs to get better situationally but I think that’ll come with more experience. He has a great scheme that is qb friendly. Hopefully Darnold excels in it. We have the weapons and a qb that can stretch the field. Hopefully it works.

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

As an OC Brady just needs to direct the offense to score points. It's very simple to judge. Leadership isn't the thing I'm concerned about. That's for a HC and players.

If you listen to the folks who know what they are looking at they see hints of a dynamic offense design. Now its time to progress towards executing it.

I'm almost indifferent to him but optimistic. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hard to interpret some of Brugler's opinions. Capable of running a robust route tree sounds like a lazy thing to say - I'm sure just about every slot TE is capable of running a full route tree... I want to know if he is currently able to (which from tape leads me to a no). Granted, it's pretty common for most receivers/TE not having a full route tree developed before they get drafted. Agility/acceleration after the catch hasn't shown up on his tape (at least his Oregon tape) for those dig/out breaking routes while it has for the seam and slant routes. Agree he has a good physical build and he is very good running seam routes. His build definitely helps him to shield defenders and create a large target point for the QB. Drops were a concern, but it could be focus drops just like T-Mac was/is prone to. Run blocking is an accurate statement, but again, we have only seen him run block in the slot/backfield - inline blocking is a whole different animal. With his athleticism, he definitely has a high ceiling. I just think he also has a low floor and don't like taking that big of a risk on a mid 1st rounder. I think this is a deep TE draft and would much rather target one in the 3rd or later. He's very boom or bust to me - bust in terms of being worth a 1st round pick, not an out of the NFL in a few years type bust. I feel like he gives me Evan Engram vibes. Not saying that Evan Engram was/is a bad NFL player, just that most people would agree he shouldn't have been drafted in the 1st.
    • I mean I would love 6-1. It’s funny the hurricanes usually dominate the first game and win by three or four goals. But keep the second game close. It would be nice if it’s the reverse of that tonight.
    • Brugler has him as TE1 and going to the Ravens in the first.  Apparently Sadiq's football IQ is pretty high (interviewed very well).  Also he was an WR and CB in high school.  This is why I always thought his route running was solid.  I'm sure it needs some polishing but for a TE it's pretty good. nfl.com Built like a bodyguard with a compact, well-defined frame. Capable of running a robust route tree. Gets in and out of breaks with good snap and separation. Vandalizes defensive seams with impunity against man coverage. Survives collisions with catches thanks to his hand strength. Shows off agility and acceleration after the catch. Fits up run blocks with proper positioning and base width. Grips and presses forward with moving feet to stay connected. -Again I don't know if we should take him but if he goes to the right team he could become a scary weapon at the next level.  I just like him as a prospect.
×
×
  • Create New...