Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Game Balls - Who gets em?


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

5 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

OL may not have been dominant but they did their job

Which is shocking considering what we all feared.

Maybe that changes next week but for now, they kept Sam upright more often than not.

Sam just has to do a better job being more accurate in the redzone.

 

If they continue to play this way, I like our chances going forward.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

 

That was cool as fug to watch.  

Shows just how much this team likes Sam. 

Was that Sam who said : "Okay...Family on 3.  1...2...3....FAMILY!"

 

 

BTW, there should be more than one Game Ball, right?

Edited by glenwo2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1. This team will go as far as CMC can take them.  All other factors cancel out and fade into the background. The ONLY real difference between these teams was that we have a RB who can get nearly 100 yds receiving and running on any given day. Best player on the field by far and the determining factor in this win.

If this team has even a glimmer of hope to win more games than we lose, he’s going to have to do that 10 more times at least.

2. Our entire DL is going to cause problems for teams all year, that means putting opponents in bad down and distance situations and lots of sacks.

Not sure why we didn’t see the same kind of intensity in the 2nd half on D.  Perhaps the Jets made adjustments.  

If I had to single out one player, it would be Brown.  Loved how Shaq played, too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, Panthers Rhule said:

Another honorable mention is Horn. Besides that one TD near the end he shut his man down and even that play he almost got his hand on it. Excellent rookie first game at a position where rookies are known to struggle. He was a supposed to be a weakness and he wasn't. He looked very promising. 

That's actually true.

We never heard about Horn aside from that TD grab by Davis which means he was doing a good job for his first professional game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Have you seen the mock drafts lately?   Most of them have us taking a QB. Just because you aren't high on these QBs doesn't mean the Panthers or other teams aren't.   If you want me to be real I just think you a Tmac homer and all you care about is us drafting him. It's why you get so defensive when people mention other prospects.   Be open to other people's ideas. Nobody in this thread is saying anything bad about your boy Tmac. 
    • Oh good lord Interest doesn't mean interest in making a bad trade to take the player, that's why I had such a long post, to accurately describe why those are two different things, but you don't like to listen to that stuff.  Being interested in a player doesn't live in a vacuum. It's very simple... there isn't a #1 draft pick type of grade on any of these QB's, if there was, we'd just take them.  You can't bluff a pick everyone knows you won't make, and trying to trade the pick is the CLEAR signal that you're not taking the QB. Just because the Raiders would have interest, doesn't mean they're going to bail us out of a situation we don't want to be in, they'd be smart about it and just sit put, let us take a non QB as we'd be telling the world we're not taking one just by trying to trade the pick, and then they'd take him at #2 (either with their own pick or by trading less to get that one). Oh, and your point of "if nobody is willing to make the trade, you obviously just take the best QB" is quite literally the dumbest thing I've ever read on here. If nobody is willing to trade up to take the QB, then it's OBVIOUS that the QB isn't worth taking with that pick, so OBVIOUSLY taking the best QB there is just OBVIOUSLY stupid and a bad pick. The moral of it is if there is a QB worth taking, we're taking them and not making the trade.  If there isn't a QB worth taking there, nobody is trading up to #1 to take one, we just showed the NFL how bad of an idea that is 2 years ago, it's really not hard to see. You keep making up this mythical situation where there is a QB who has shown to be worth trading up to #1 for and we'll be able to leverage that into a trade.  But we're the most QB needy team in the league, if we end up with the #1 pick, either we are taking a QB #1 or no QB is going #1 unless we get VERY lucky and two teams in the Top 5 fall in love with one prospect and we can play them off each other and fleece one of them. But again, I can't see that happening, as if there was a QB worthy of that, we're just taking him ourselves.
    • Sanders is with Tom Brady brand and that's his mentor. The Raiders owner was with Sanders taking pics at a Vegas game together.   It doesn't take much to connect the dots that Vegas will be interested in Sanders as their franchise QB. Oh yeah and guess who hasa small ownership stake in the Raiders Tom Brady.   I guess this is just another made up Madden idea by me huh?
×
×
  • Create New...