Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

In your opinion, how did we fair in certain areas in comparison to last year?


mbarbour21
 Share

Recommended Posts

6 hours ago, mbarbour21 said:

***How do you guys think we faired in the areas we performed poorly in last year?***

Good topic !  

I am really encouraged by the solid run defense & 3rd down D in game 1.   It's a huge improvement from last year.  

As you mentioned, the offense still needs to get the TE involved a lot more.  That's a problem from last season which is still hanging around.  Maybe doing so would also help our poor redzone performance.  And take some of the burden off of CMC as well. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, JawnyBlaze said:

Like I said, even when making the same throws as Teddy, he made them BETTER.

I mean, that isn't actually true. Just check out the intermediate throws.  Sam had 0 completions on Sunday and 1 in the preseason.   And checking down is a push, Sam doesn't check down better than Teddy Checkdown Bridgewater. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, CRA said:

Ok, Tom Brady couldn't make that throw.  PJ Walker could.   That's where you are focusing the convo.   And it's not like Sam was throwing it on a rope.  But yeah, he doesn't have more arm ability. 

the original point was THAT opportunity is the one Teddy would take. He did in the clip.    

Darnold has spent his time to date overwhelming checking down.  Frankly, at a greater degree than Teddy started.  Camp, preseason, and now week 1.    That's the conversation I am having.  It looks like he is being deliberately coached into being a checkdown QB.    The intermediate routes is my focus.  Not 20+.  

 

Do you think that's an indictment on him as a QB if that's the case? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, CRA said:

22 of his 24 completions were 10 yards or less downfield week 1. 

I believe 18 of his 19 preseason completions were 10 yards or less downfield 

and all camp reporters were asking Rhule about Darnold checking down with such a high level consistency 

that’s a pretty consistent trend to date and has to be coaching.    And it’s checking down a greater rate than Teddy because he was always able to work in the 10-20 yard intermediate plays.  

and if you call that making plays downfield….then you can’t call Teddy a Checkdown player.  Because Teddy pushes the ball down the field more than that.    

and again, maybe that is the right call with Sam.   But IMO this staff has handled Sam like damaged goods.  Which he is.  But it’s also why I temper expectations for him. 

I think thats probably be design though, right?  When you have YAC monsters like CMC and DJ Moore on your team, it behooves you to get the ball out quickly to them, in space, and let them to their thing. 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, CRA said:

I mean, that isn't actually true. Just check out the intermediate throws.  Sam had 0 completions on Sunday and 1 in the preseason.   And checking down is a push, Sam doesn't check down better than Teddy Checkdown Bridgewater. 

The pass to DJ Moore wasn't intermediate? 

Maybe you'd better clarify to me what your definitions are of :

1.) Short Throws

2.) Intermediate Throws

3.) Deep Throws

 

That way I know where' you're coming from.   Thanks.

Edited by glenwo2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, joemac said:

I think thats probably be design though, right?  When you have YAC monsters like CMC and DJ Moore on your team, it behooves you to get the ball out quickly to them, in space, and let them to their thing. 

That and trust in our o-line. I have to believe a lot of it comes from the fear our o-line wont give Darnold the time. Which is why I hope we put the majority of our focus this coming up off-season on fixing that issue. Should be number one priority if Darnold works out. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, mbarbour21 said:

That and trust in our o-line. I have to believe a lot of it comes from the fear our o-line wont give Darnold the time. Which is why I hope we put the majority of our focus this coming up off-season on fixing that issue. Should be number one priority if Darnold works out. 

Hear Hear.  You have to think it will be, assuming we're comfortable with Sam for the next few years.  Outside of O-Line this team actually has very few holes.  Next offseason we need to concentrate on quality depth at all spots and really hammer the line. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, glenwo2 said:

The pass to DJ Moore wasn't intermediate? 

Maybe you'd better clarify to me what your definitions are of :

1.) Short Throws

2.) Intermediate Throws

3.) Deep Throws

 

That way I know where' you're coming from.   Thanks.

10-20 yards downfield. 

21 of his 24 completions were 10 yards or less downfield.  He had 3 over 20+ yards.  Zero intermediate throws.  DJ was 25 yards. 

In his one half during the preseason he completed one intermediate ball (10-20 yards downfield).   

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, CRA said:

22 of his 24 completions were 10 yards or less downfield week 1. 

I believe 18 of his 19 preseason completions were 10 yards or less downfield 

and all camp reporters were asking Rhule about Darnold checking down with such a high level consistency 

that’s a pretty consistent trend to date and has to be coaching.    And it’s checking down a greater rate than Teddy because he was always able to work in the 10-20 yard intermediate plays.  

and if you call that making plays downfield….then you can’t call Teddy a Checkdown player.  Because Teddy pushes the ball down the field more than that.    

and again, maybe that is the right call with Sam.   But IMO this staff has handled Sam like damaged goods.  Which he is.  But it’s also why I temper expectations for him. 

Which is concerning if true.

Why did they ship Teddy out of town and give away draft picks to acquire Donald if that's the approach their going to take. Teddy could have handed the ball off and checked it down to Mccaffrey if that's the case. 

Donald showed he has the arm talent on that pass to Robby, so why are they hesitant?

And all the people talking about the online, look at the throws Zach Wilson was making and he was under much more distress than Sam and he wasn't just checking it down to the running back. Not that it's a bad thing Mccaffrey is great but we have more weapons than him that need to be utilized. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, joemac said:

Hear Hear.  You have to think it will be, assuming we're comfortable with Sam for the next few years.  Outside of O-Line this team actually has very few holes.  Next offseason we need to concentrate on quality depth at all spots and really hammer the line. 

If Darnold at QB and Carter at LB are who we plan on going forward with, I think our needs look like this:

1. OL

2. OL depth

3. TE

4. Back up LBs 

That's assuming Tremble or someone doesn't step up. Plus, that doesn't mean we can't upgrade somewhere else if we get high value at another position. But FOR THE LOVE OF ALL THAT IS HOLY, can we please make OL a priority for the first time in over a decade. That'd be great, thanks. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Pantherxtreme said:

Which is concerning if true.

Why did they ship Teddy out of town and give away draft picks to acquire Donald if that's the approach their going to take. Teddy could have handed the ball off and checked it down to Mccaffrey if that's the case. 

Donald showed he has the arm talent on that pass to Robby, so why are they hesitant?

And all the people talking about the online, look at the throws Zach Wilson was making and he was under much more distress than Sam and he wasn't just checking it down to the running back. Not that it's a bad thing Mccaffrey is great but we have more weapons than him that need to be utilized. 

I think Sam has been instructed to play like he is.  All the beat writers commented on what they were doing with Sam in camp and him overly playing the checkdown/short game.   The throws in his preseason and week 1 game back up what they all commented on and asked Rhule about in camp. 

Which that might be the smart thing to do.   But it's going to be hard to compete with good teams if that is the Sam plan.  

I think Rhule is way more conservative on O than some people believe.  People haven't paid enough attention to how he has had his success.  It has never been about the offense.   I don't think he had a problem with checkdown Teddy.  I think he had a problem with Teddy running his mouth to the media.  Then the staff returned the favor and trashed him for not being good enough.  But I think Rhule would have been happy with Teddy if the O/CMC was healthy.  And Sam is going to be encouraged to be very much like Teddy IMO.  Which just isn't by cup of tea when it comes to NFL football. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Pantherxtreme said:

Which is concerning if true.

Why did they ship Teddy out of town and give away draft picks to acquire Donald if that's the approach their going to take. Teddy could have handed the ball off and checked it down to Mccaffrey if that's the case. 

Donald showed he has the arm talent on that pass to Robby, so why are they hesitant?

And all the people talking about the online, look at the throws Zach Wilson was making and he was under much more distress than Sam and he wasn't just checking it down to the running back. Not that it's a bad thing Mccaffrey is great but we have more weapons than him that need to be utilized. 

You saw Wilson get sacked 6 times and generally get pummeled, right?

For all the hype the talking heads are giving Wilson right now, that isn't sustainable. He'll be broken by midseason if he takes that kind of punishment every game. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, CRA said:

I think Sam has been instructed to play like he is.  All the beat writers commented on what they were doing with Sam in camp and him overly playing the checkdown/short game.   The throws in his preseason and week 1 game back up what they all commented on and asked Rhule about in camp. 

Which that might be the smart thing to do.   But it's going to be hard to compete with good teams if that is the Sam plan.  

I think Rhule is way more conservative on O than some people believe.  People haven't paid enough attention to how he has had his success.  It has never been about the offense.   I don't think he had a problem with checkdown Teddy.  I think he had a problem with Teddy running his mouth to the media.  Then the staff returned the favor and trashed him for not being good enough.  But I think Rhule would have been happy with Teddy if the O/CMC was healthy.  And Sam is going to be encouraged to be very much like Teddy IMO.  Which just isn't by cup of tea when it comes to NFL football. 

It's the system

Remember every Saints game where Drew Brees 'padded' stats and dinked and dunked his way downfield against us? How frustrating that was and how some fans bitched because he wasn't playing hero ball like our QB so all those TDs didn't count?

Yeah, that's what Rhule and Brady are trying to do here. They're drilling into him to play within the system - take what the defence gives you and stop playing hero ball. Use those quick throws to loosen up the deep ball - as we saw with the Anderson TD. 

Brady was more aggressive at LSU because he had multiple first rounders at the skill positions - so you CAN throw those one on one matchups and win them 90% of the time. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
    • Jackie, any more reps tomorrow, or is that it for this session?  thanks for the work
    • How can you say they aren’t trying to win now with all the moves made in free agency? Or is trading first round picks the only way to be win now? I’d be fine never trading another first round pick again, win now be damned.
×
×
  • Create New...