Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Baldy Breaks Down the Carolina Panthers


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

32 minutes ago, micnificent28 said:

Not necessarily... Burns isn't guaranteed to bring down Winston who is a but heavier than Wilson and shakes of sacks that aren't true to technique. Wilson is about what 210?.. Winston runs around 230-240. 

Burns isn't a rookie anymore man he's checking in mid 250s...  Muscle mass >>> Body mass Winston Wilson is slippery like Russell  Wilson. Winston might on a good day be a very slow Ben Rapistburger.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Jets game wasn't perfect, but it's the 1st real game with starters. It will get better. I think everybody is expecting we should have killed them and maybe we should have, but we won and played fairly good. When the O-line took a hit in the 3Q, we bent a little backwards. But we won. I think we can match the Saints energy and they've got some guys out. Our defense is only going to get better the more we play. 

 

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, TrevorLaurenceTime22 said:

Burns isn't a rookie anymore man he's checking in mid 250s...  Muscle mass >>> Body mass Winston Wilson is slippery like Russell  Wilson. Winston might on a good day be a very slow Ben Rapistburger.

Russell is a 4.53 guy. Winston is a "mobile in the pocket" guy. Russell is a genuine scrambling QB.

Winston will be way more susceptible to pressure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, kungfoodude said:

Russell is a 4.53 guy. Winston is a "mobile in the pocket" guy. Russell is a genuine scrambling QB.

Winston will be way more susceptible to pressure.

This is what I was arguing, I was referencing rookie Wilson's mobility to Seattle Wilson's. Big difference between those guys and Winston.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, TrevorLaurenceTime22 said:

This is what I was arguing, I was referencing rookie Wilson's mobility to Seattle Wilson's. Big difference between those guys and Winston.

Completely different types of QB's. Winston is much closer to a traditional pocket passer.

If we can generate a pass rush, he should be much easier to snare than Zach Wilson was.

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, mav1234 said:

Talk about doing more with less... Well, last year anyway, now both sides are stacked.

I think Brady has lots of room to grow tho.

Agreed. Snow is much further along in his career compared to Brady. We just need to hope Brady is a guy that learns quickly and grows with us as a franchise. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It's honestly pretty interesting just seeing this pairing play out. Canales’ offenses (Seattle, Tampa) are run-first, under-center, play-action systems built around defined reads and intermediate/deep timing throws. That structure worked when he had QBs like Baker Mayfield or Russell Wilson in a system that created clear launch points and sightlines. His success has always been tied to a credible run game + play-action gravity. You can see that with the Panthers team building philosophy as well. Coker and TMac both are bigger receivers that won't get the best YAC production but thrive as possession receivers in contested scenarios. They're not the best in space and creating additional yardage in such, and would likely fair better systematically with a stronger armed QB who can create better opportunities on those boundary 1v1 matchups with stronger throws. Bryce, on the other hand, is a spread-native QB. His strengths are rhythm, spacing, quick processing, and off-script creation. Asking him to live in condensed formations with long-developing play-action concepts just hasn't been his forte. And well, his boundary throws are limited in velocity which takes a big chunk of the playbook off. And I mean a QB like Bryce can still work, it's just Dave's offensive philosophy and foundation is very much at odds with Young's physical limits and his own experience. So it's certainly still a learning experience for Dave to figure out how he can mesh his offensive philosophy with Young's strengths. He's very inexperienced with maximizing Bryce's strengths with his system. Would love to see us bring in an OC with spread experience and adaptability to implement a cohesive system with Dave to allow Bryce to thrive, as it's obvious we're sticking with him for a bit longer.   
    • Only thing I really agreed with is questioning why we didn’t take any timeouts on their last drive.  I know hindsight is 20/20, but I think it would’ve saved clock bc they were desperate to score as soon as the opportunity presented itself, but I also think it could’ve helped the defense regroup and maybe give us a better chance to stop them.
×
×
  • Create New...