Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Is this good? This sounds good.


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, mwright350 said:

I was told we're not allowed to be happy about our defensive stats because of who we played.  We're supposed to bitch, moan, whine, and cry until we play the 2 or 3 teams that are considered "real" teams apparently.

Just keep in mind once we beat them they're no longer real teams.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's good but we've played two of the worst teams in the league starting rookie QBs. Not sure what to make of the Saints. They were handicapped some but not sure how much affect the coaches had (apparently they were only missing one player from the line-up that drubbed that Packers in week 1). So, it good but and I'm happy with where we are but still being cautious.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • We brought the HC in because he is excellent with QBs. Please no more knee jerk coaching scapegoats unless the OL can’t handle a stunt.  I mean, you know, they also saw on tape all the reasons he was selected where he was or whatever that bullshit was. Every decent play he made last year fits on a floppy disk. About two minutes worth.  What are they supposed to say? They have to do that. I thpought it was pretty faint praise on an enthusiasm level, but that could be my lack of it clouding things.. 
    • There's a few good double-dip combinations that could be nice.  Legette would be more palatable with that type of scenario as well. Could end up with: McConkey/AD Mitchell 33 + Polk/Roman/Legette/Pearsall 39 (maybe even a minor trade down from 39 to the 40s) Or BPA 33, and this: Polk/Roman/Legette/Pearsall 39 + Malik/Baker/McMillan/Rice later I'd personally love a scenario where we end up with Ja'Lynn Polk, Trey Benson & Malik Washington somehow.  Those are the dudes I'm all about.   
    • I mean, Canales is a first year HC with a grand total of 1 year as OC under his belt running a bottom tier O.  Just doing the HC job is enough on his plate.  Will he call plays? Sure.  Input? Sure.  I mean, we just did that identical whole dance last year with a vet HC.  I mean, Bryce Young is on his 2nd OC and both his OCs were rookies that had never been OC.  That's not really an excuse.  It's just pointing out the Panthers are doing everything on paper you would say a team shouldn't do for someone like Bryce......but since it's our team we argue it as okay.  I can say that and it not be an excuse for Bryce.  I don't think Bryce has the tools to be a good NFL QB.  But the Panthers IMO are doing the right things to make him be able to reach whatever ceiling he does have IMO. 
×
×
  • Create New...