Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

OL looked bad last night


SBBlue
 Share

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, mbarbour21 said:

I think the ratings leave some context out. 

Like with the pass block win rate. Does that include when no one engages a pass rusher? If not, then that doesn't even factor into the equation, which results in a better grade for the o-line even though they let a rusher come in uncontested.

I really just ignore those, and the PRWR.  Based on those, the jets DL>>>>Panther DL.

You can be number 1 in PRWR and have no tackles, qb hits, sacks, PD, TFL, or FF.  Weeks one that is exactly what happend.  I got past my guy, but didn't do anything essentially.

Edited by SBBlue
Link to comment
Share on other sites

OL is our biggest weakness and will only get exposed more if they don't fix it.  I am really hopeful that Brown and Christensen can develop quickly because Daley and Elflein have looked terrible.

Edited by NAS
fixed name
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, glenwo2 said:

How the fug does Sam still manage to do it with that O-Line?

 

It wasn't Jets or Saints bad.  

It wasn't horrific.  Sam had time on many throws, in fact it seems like he was a bit more hesitant last night.

I'm just saying it looked like and statistically-wise was, our worst OL performance yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, PghPanther said:

I wouldn't say bad as much as inconsistent...................at times thing clicked (heck the scored 24 points) but just not consistent as a good power run block oline looks like........

24 points is actually very average.  Slightly below in fact.  In 2020, 24 points per game would have put us somewhere between 17th and 20th.

We aren't far off, and we can get there.  To be a top 10 scoring offense we need to pick up another 3 points per game.  A top 10 offense and a top 10 defense will always have a chance, so that should be our goal.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, BrianS said:

24 points is actually very average.  Slightly below in fact.  In 2020, 24 points per game would have put us somewhere between 17th and 20th.

We aren't far off, and we can get there.  To be a top 10 scoring offense we need to pick up another 3 points per game.  A top 10 offense and a top 10 defense will always have a chance, so that should be our goal.

Panthers left anywhere from 3 to 14 points on the board depending on how you look at it. 4th and 1 stop could have kicked a FG there. To the fact they could have scored 2 TDs on the two red zone trips that netted a grand total of 3 points. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, NAS said:

OL is our biggest weakness and will only get exposed more if they don't fix it.  I am really hopeful that Brown and Christensen can develop quickly because Staley and Elflein have looked terrible.

Elflien didn't play last night and I don't know who Staley is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, hepcat said:

Panthers left anywhere from 3 to 14 points on the board depending on how you look at it. 4th and 1 stop could have kicked a FG there. To the fact they could have scored 2 TDs on the two red zone trips that netted a grand total of 3 points. 

That Chuba up the gut on 4th and 1 was the STUPIDIST play call yet. I was like WTF.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, NAS said:

I mean to say Daley.  and Elflein played first two games and looked like crap.  Keep splitting hairs.

Sorry I really didn't realize who you were referring too.  Elflein is bad, but we looked worse without him.
It appears that Elflein>Daley.  Paradis spent game one helping Daley out leaving Elflein to fend for himself with their best DLman QWilliams.

I'm a little concerned that we don't see more Brown and BC.  Is it because their not ready yet, or we're trying to keep them fresh for a late season push?

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't really care about PFF, its rather pointless.

The oline struggled at times last night, but seemed to do a lot better in the 4th qtr.  Late in the game, Sam had time and the running backs had some holes to run thru.  We were able to run the ball even when they knew we would be running the ball.  

One interesting thing from last night.  We didn't punt one single time in the entire second half.  We either scored or ran out the clock.  

Edited by Davidson Deac II
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ForJimmy said:

Weren’t you just complaining about people complaining about the OL last week? On a bright note, Paradis was making it happen on the QB sneaks!

I was.  I was saying in games 1 and 2 that we looked good considering we were going up against elite DL's.  That we should celebrate when the line does well and it did, especially considering the competition.  

We had our worst performance so far against what PFF considers the worst line in the league.  The line did not do as well last night.  

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, BrianS said:

24 points is actually very average.  Slightly below in fact.  In 2020, 24 points per game would have put us somewhere between 17th and 20th.

We aren't far off, and we can get there.  To be a top 10 scoring offense we need to pick up another 3 points per game.  A top 10 offense and a top 10 defense will always have a chance, so that should be our goal.

Its not just the amount of points though.  We had several long time consuming drives last night.  We only had the ball four times in the entire second half (assuming nfl box score is correct).  Two td's, one field goal, and ran out the clock on the last one.  That is extremely efficient.  

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Well, we built on that momentum alright. LOL Trying to prop up a QB with a game plan instead of trying to do your best to win a game with the tools you have at your disposal is what you do with a rookie early on in his career on a bad team. It's not what you do with a 3rd year #1 overall pick when you're shockingly sitting at 6-5 and playing for the division lead.
    • Canales outsmarts himself on a very consisent basis. In some ways, he is one of the most ill suited to be head coach of the Tepper tenure.
    • i find this to be alarming on so many levels  im going to change the order of the portions i copied from Joe’s article i  really have serious doubts   about Canales’ common sense  1. A running team forgetting to run  2. Making this game plan about Young’s passing game momentum .  Total idiot.  It is about winning games not about young’s momentum. That is what practice is for , not live games  god help us all.    Article below  Confused by the Panthers’ pass-heavy play calls vs. 49ers? Rico Dowdle probably was, too   CHARLOTTE, N.C. — In two seasons here, Canales has juggled offensive play calling with his head coach responsibilities. Sometimes the balls end up on the floor. In two critical moments Monday night, Canales chose to go with a pass in situations where a handoff would have been the more direct approach. The first was the disastrous, first-and-goal play from the 1 where Bryce Young opted against running in for the score and instead lobbed the ball toward rookie Mitchell Evans, only to see safety Ji’Ayir Brown come down with it. The second one was just as perplexing. When the 49ers were whistled for roughing long snapper J.J. Jansen on Ryan Fitzgerald’s successful PAT pulled the Panthers to 17-10, Canales took the point off the board and went for a 2-pointer from the 1. But Canales ran a play that didn’t take advantage of the spot, with Young missing Jalen Coker in the back of the end zone. (Rookie wideout Jimmy Horn Jr. appeared to be the first read in the flat.) Canales said after the game he wanted to build on Young’s record-breaking passing performance in Atlanta, and thought the line was protecting well. But that lack of rhythm Canales mentioned was the result of never giving Dowdle the opportunity to get into it. When Dowdle ripped off a 17-yard gain on the first offensive play of the second half, Canales came back to him two plays later. It was his final carry.   After an overnight, cross-country flight, Rico Dowdle began his Tuesday — at least on social media — with an emoji. Dowdle’s post on Xcontained no words accompanying the face with spiral eyes emoji, which EmojiTerra tells us symbolizes “confusion, dizziness, overwhelm or being utterly shocked.” Per the website, it’s often used to convey “feeling dazed, hypnotized, or caught off-guard in troubling or surprising situations.” It’s not hard to figure out why the Carolina Panthers running back would be feeling some or all of those emotions. Dowdle has been one of the Panthers’ fun, feel-good stories this season, an Asheville native who signed a prove-it deal with his home-state team and then got right to the business of proving it. Before the Panthers hosted the Dallas Cowboys in Week 6, Dowdle warned his former team to “buckle up,” then backed up his words by running for 183 yards and racking up 239 yards from scrimmage. But in a 20-9 loss to the San Francisco 49ers on Monday night, it was Dowdle who was buckled up. And the guy who strapped Dowdle into a safety harness and threw on the child-safety locks was none other than Panthers coach Dave Canales. Dowdle led all backs Monday — including Christian McCaffrey — by averaging 6.3 yards per carry. But while 49ers coach Kyle Shanahan was feeding McCaffrey a cornucopia of 24 carries and 31 touches, Dowdle finished with a meager six rushing attempts. That matched his season low from a loss at Arizona in Week 2, when Chuba Hubbard was still RB1 and the Panthers were throwing nearly every down in the second half trying to catch up. Dowdle wasn’t the only back Canales dissed. Hubbard had just three carries and the Panthers finished with 13 as a team, tied for the fifth fewest in franchise history. Some of it was about opportunity, or lack of it. With the 49ers’ two touchdown drives consuming more than 16 minutes, the Panthers ran just 43 offensive plays, which matched their low under Canales and tied for the second fewest in team history. But Canales, who arrived in Charlotte last year preaching the balanced offense gospel, conceded Tuesday that he didn’t emphasize the running plays on his call sheet nearly enough. “Offensively, just could not get our rhythm going. And really it just started off with the run game. I have to make sure that that comes alive,” he said during an opening statement to reporters. “That’s a part of who we are. It’s a part of what we believe in. We have two great backs that contribute to this team. The offensive line was blocking well and that was a missed opportunity by me. And I’ll do better in that regard.”        
×
×
  • Create New...