Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Talking Cowboys - What do you know?

Zod

By Zod,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

Fug Drump Enthusiast

Fug Drump

Posted
Posted
37 minutes ago, Monrowed said:

So every game is equal and there is never an ounce of bias on the behalf of the officials?

I think all teams playing at home gets a little more cooking than the away team.  But I definitely don't believe a certain specific team gets bias because of what city they play in.

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Fug Drump Enthusiast

Fug Drump

Posted
Posted
38 minutes ago, PootieNunu said:

It should be a good game, it would be even better with both teams 100% healthy but it is what it is. We still have our pass rushers and they are going to have to fight through the holds and put Dak on his ass. 

Well every offensive line holds, so it is what it is but the Eagles showed that Dallas is vulnerable up the middle with a strong pass rush.  Dallas is still missing their starting guard so the Panthers have to exploit that from the first defensive possession. 

  • Pie 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted
7 minutes ago, Fug Drump said:

I think all teams playing at home gets a little more cooking than the away team.  But I definitely don't believe a certain specific team gets bias because of what city they play in.

I don't think teams specifically get biased calls.  I do think certain plays get calls others don't.  I think that is where ref bias really shows itself the most.    I don't consider crews that call certain things heavier than others bias.  You see that a lot too.  But that is part of coaching, knowing what crew is calling your game and their tendency....and you should know that and play to it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
KB_fan Proficient

KB_fan

Posted
Posted
13 minutes ago, mbarbour21 said:

***Cowboys are 26-0 when they run more than they throw.***

***Zeke and Pollard both finished with over 5 yards per carry.***

Our defense has to stay on top of the run. If not, we will lose.

Panthers have the #1 rushing defense in the league currently.

Dallas excelling on Run-Block Win Rate. Will be a stiff challenge for our rushing defense. Really may be THE key factor in the game.

Shutting down the Dallas run game would give incredible legitimacy to the Panthers D.

 

 

  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Fug Drump Enthusiast

Fug Drump

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, CRA said:

I don't think teams specifically get biased calls.  I do think certain plays get calls others don't.  I think that is where ref bias really shows itself the most.    I don't consider crews that call certain things heavier than others bias.  You see that a lot too.  But that is part of coaching, knowing what crew is calling your game and their tendency....and you should know that and play to it. 

 Now I definitely agree that certain players get more bias than others.  A rookie or average player gets flagged faster than a pro bowler.

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
mbarbour21 Proficient

mbarbour21

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, KB_fan said:

Panthers have the #1 rushing defense in the league currently.

Dallas excelling on Run-Block Win Rate. Will be a stiff challenge for our rushing defense. Really may be THE key factor in the game.

Shutting down the Dallas run game would give incredible legitimacy to the Panthers D.

 

 

AGREED, as Dallas is 4th in rushing behind BAL, CLE, & TEN. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
bigdavis Rising Star

bigdavis

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, Fug Drump said:

What do politics have to do with this discussion about a solid Cowboys team going against a very very good Panthers team???  Stick to the topic. 

If anyone on here posted under the name Fug Hidinbiden, would you get triggered?

If you think so, gtf outtahere.

  • Pie 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
glenwo2 Grand Master

glenwo2

Posted
Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, Fug Drump said:

What do politics have to do with this discussion about a solid Cowboys team going against a very very good Panthers team???  Stick to the topic. 

Why don't you stick to Politics and go back to posting at CNN or FoxNews or whatever hole you crawled out of?

All you're doing here is trolling and you're not welcome.

Edited by glenwo2
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • SmokinwithWilly
      Rookies

      By SmokinwithWilly · Posted

      The only thing I said was he was part of the staff that made part of the decisions, and that I am judging the decisions made by that group as a whole. As assistant GM, you can pretty much guarantee his input held more sway than an intern or the guy that takes coffee requests. Fitterer didn't operate in a vacuum. Neither does Morgan now. While Fitterer did have the ultimate decision, to say that Dan had no input in ranking boards, evaluating FAs, trade offers or anything else would be asinine. We all know he did. Otherwise what the hell was his job as assistant GM? He wouldn't have been kept for 3 years if he was arguing every decision Scott ever made.    And the actual quote was "Morgan has done a bang up job in the draft and FA. Compared to what the last guy did, he is kicking ass and taking names." So is XL kicking ass and Brooks taking names from last years draft or did I get it backwards? We took Wallace over Payton Wilson because he was an injury risk after trading up for a RB with a torn ACL? Which one of the kicking ass and taking names was that?  Maybe we should review the thousands of gameday posts calling for XL to get off the field because he's a bust and can't catch a cold. We could review the posts about Brooks but... And Wilson. He's at 118 tackles this season vs 36 for Wallace.  I gave credit to Dan for a good draft this year. But I'm also not ignoring last year's draft either since he did that one after the last guy too.  That's not a strawman. 
    • shaqattaq
      WE WIN FUG BAKER MAYFIELD THREAD!

      By shaqattaq · Posted

      And then, in week 18, we can take Mayfield out of the game and whoop Bridgewater's @$$ for good measure! Let the former QB revenge train roll on!!
    • MHS831
      I’m starting to believe Nijman….

      By MHS831 · Posted

      If we keep our guards in tact ($$$) and go with Mays at C, some OT depth would be nice. I think we should be happy about CB with Thornton's development (pre injury) and Smith Wade. I think Ransom is developing nicely, but I would like to see a FS type for situations. We suck at ILB and Edge (as a whole). We should be OK at RB.  I hope we sign Dowdle to a short contract. QB?  There are signs of hope and development.  (I don't like our backup QB) TE?  Good draft for TE, but I think we are developing with Evans, Sanders, and Tremble. WR?  A #2 with Coker and Horn in the slot.  XL?  What is that? We should be good in 2026. Morgan does more than draft.  Free agency has been strong too.  (Just emptying my brain on your comment--sorry)
×
×
  • Create New...