Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Shaq


 Share

Recommended Posts

Shaq has had a great year and earning that paycheck. He wasn’t right when he came back in the game.    If we lose him for 2-3 games (let’s say with plantar fasciitis) who’s the next man up? Does Chinn move to LB…we are already down Horn in the secondary.  We are playing four 1-3 teams next but if Shaq is missing do those games get dicey?

Edited by slumdogmillionaire
  • Pie 2
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Have they even provided an update on Shaq and Reddick?  I know both came back, but I didn't even hear Rhule asked about them in the presser...  regardless, just watching during the game, without ever getting a report on it, I assumed Shaq's injury was a shoulder or arm thing and if not, at least upper body/torso.  It looked like when he dove to tackle he immediately felt pain and rolled over with his arms tucked in.  He never appeared to look at or favor anything but his upper body, and the way he was holding his arms, I assumed it was a stinger.

Was hoping to get an update on those guys today in the presser.

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Proudiddy said:

Have they even provided an update on Shaq and Reddick?  I know both came back, but I didn't even hear Rhule asked about them in the presser...  regardless, just watching during the game, without ever getting a report on it, I assumed Shaq's injury was a shoulder or arm thing and if not, at least upper body/torso.  It looked like when he dove to tackle he immediately felt pain and rolled over with his arms tucked in.  He never appeared to look at or favor anything but his upper body, and the way he was holding his arms, I assumed it was a stinger.

Was hoping to get an update on those guys today in the presser.

If true this is good news, I initially thought it was his knee as he landed on it pretty hard, but did not see any kind of limp.

This defense without shaq, Horn, or Reddick would not be good at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don't think Dave touches the defense. That might be a mark against him but definitely a huge red flag for evero. He refuses to run anything other than soft zone and when you don't get pressure that's an awful scheme
    • You don't have to convince me. I think not picking up the option should absolutely be firmly on the table but I just do not see Tepper and Morgan doing that for previously stated reasons. Therefore I'm not going to bother entertaining the notion. Just hoping we actually get real viable competition. If that doesn't happen at the minimum then my perception of that is complete and utter professional malpractice.
    • It was absolutely a catch, and I can’t believe how many folks were stating, before the NFL’s apology, that the overturn was the right call.  The ultimate question in this case is this: can a player complete a catch with only one hand? Of course, we all know the answer to that question, and it is an emphatic “Yes.” T-Mac maintained complete control with one hand (believe it was the right) while the other came off when the ball hit the ground. The ball was in the same position in the one hand (watch T-Mac’s fingers in relation to the NFL shield on the ball) after touching the ground as it was when it first went to the ground. Going back to the question above, if one hand can establish control, then there was no need for the other to stay on the ball, so long as the ball doesn’t move in that one hand that stays on it   It blew my mind that they overturned this in the first place. This should not be a “We got it wrong on the replay because there wasn’t clear and convincing evidence.” This should have been, “That was absolutely a catch.”
×
×
  • Create New...