Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Revisiting an OL question

Mr. Scot

By Mr. Scot,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

Waldo Grand Master

Waldo

Posted
Posted
11 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

Maybe you should stop assuming anything about anyone because so far you are wrong on both counts?

Lol defensive much? Cool, keep on cheerleading if you want. Oline doesn't look to be his strength, small sample size here but also concerning outside of the draft which will be another huge step in evaluating his work.

Enjoy his tit, I'm just hoping he can get a lot better in that aspect and not impressed with his work in that area at all yet.

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
frankw Grand Master

frankw

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, Waldo said:

Lol defensive much? Cool, keep on cheerleading if you want. Oline doesn't look to be his strength, small sample size here but also concerning outside of the draft which will be another huge step in evaluating his work.

Enjoy his tit, I'm just hoping he can get a lot better in that aspect and not impressed with his work in that area at all yet.

Well two trades for defense within a week while the oline is in shambles does sound like what went on in Seattle a little bit if we are being fair here.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
  • Author
Posted (edited)
3 hours ago, iamhubby1 said:

Hey, @Mr. ScotYou started this thread. Why don't you  give us your thoughts? 

At some point...

I've said many times though that my preference for starting a discussion is to ask a question and let people give their thoughts.

(as opposed to "Here's my opinion and you know I'm right so everybody deal with it!") 😕

Edited by Mr. Scot
Link to comment
Share on other sites
iamhubby1 Veteran

iamhubby1

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Mr. Scot said:

At some point...

I've said many times though that my preference for starting a discussion is to ask a question and let people give their thoughts.

(as opposed to "Here's my opinion and you know I'm right so everybody deal with it!") 😕

 

Yeah, it's page 5. Plenty of reactions to talk about. Yet, here you are. Quite as a Church mouse. What happens if the thread dies. We never get the ol Scotty input we all wait for.

 

You can start a thread, give your opinion. Then let the debate start. It happens all the time. Well, for everybody but you.

 

You  have to know this is what you do. You start a thread, then disappear. I mean, you do you dude.

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
  • Author
Posted
1 minute ago, iamhubby1 said:

 

Yeah, it's page 5. Plenty of reactions to talk about. Yet, here you are. Quite as a Church mouse. What happens if the thread dies. We never get the ol Scotty input we all wait for.

You can start a thread, give your opinion. Then let the debate start. It happens all the time. Well, for everybody but you.

You  have to know this is what you do. You start a thread, then disappear. I mean, you do you dude.

I don't care about being the center of attention.

I like good discussion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
jtm Community Regular

jtm

Posted
Posted

I've never understood why you'd put Moton at LT when he is elite at RT.  At best, Moton will probably be an average to below average LT because this isn't his natural position.  Let him continue being a stud RT.  

I'd try Christensen at LT b/c he certainly can't be any worse than what we've seen.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
SBBlue Veteran

SBBlue

Posted
Posted

I don't have enough info to determine if BC belongs at LT over Erving or Moton, or if BC belongs at guard or RT.  I thought when we drafted him that he was going to be our LT. 

The line is performing worse the last 2 games.   I'm sure when Brown and BC finally do get out there, huddlers will be bitching about them.  Huddlers love to  hate on Panthers linemen. 

I just want to at least get back to the OL performance we saw in the Jets or Saints games.  These last two have been bad.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • tukafan21
      With the first pick, don't draft a QB? Draft a DE? C'mon!

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      Oh good lord Interest doesn't mean interest in making a bad trade to take the player, that's why I had such a long post, to accurately describe why those are two different things, but you don't like to listen to that stuff.  Being interested in a player doesn't live in a vacuum. It's very simple... there isn't a #1 draft pick type of grade on any of these QB's, if there was, we'd just take them.  You can't bluff a pick everyone knows you won't make, and trying to trade the pick is the CLEAR signal that you're not taking the QB. Just because the Raiders would have interest, doesn't mean they're going to bail us out of a situation we don't want to be in, they'd be smart about it and just sit put, let us take a non QB as we'd be telling the world we're not taking one just by trying to trade the pick, and then they'd take him at #2 (either with their own pick or by trading less to get that one). Oh, and your point of "if nobody is willing to make the trade, you obviously just take the best QB" is quite literally the dumbest thing I've ever read on here. If nobody is willing to trade up to take the QB, then it's OBVIOUS that the QB isn't worth taking with that pick, so OBVIOUSLY taking the best QB there is just OBVIOUSLY stupid and a bad pick. The moral of it is if there is a QB worth taking, we're taking them and not making the trade.  If there isn't a QB worth taking there, nobody is trading up to #1 to take one, we just showed the NFL how bad of an idea that is 2 years ago, it's really not hard to see. You keep making up this mythical situation where there is a QB who has shown to be worth trading up to #1 for and we'll be able to leverage that into a trade.  But we're the most QB needy team in the league, if we end up with the #1 pick, either we are taking a QB #1 or no QB is going #1 unless we get VERY lucky and two teams in the Top 5 fall in love with one prospect and we can play them off each other and fleece one of them. But again, I can't see that happening, as if there was a QB worthy of that, we're just taking him ourselves.
    • CamWhoaaCam
      With the first pick, don't draft a QB? Draft a DE? C'mon!

      By CamWhoaaCam · Posted

      Sanders is with Tom Brady brand and that's his mentor. The Raiders owner was with Sanders taking pics at a Vegas game together.   It doesn't take much to connect the dots that Vegas will be interested in Sanders as their franchise QB. Oh yeah and guess who hasa small ownership stake in the Raiders Tom Brady.   I guess this is just another made up Madden idea by me huh?
    • CamWhoaaCam
      With the first pick, don't draft a QB? Draft a DE? C'mon!

      By CamWhoaaCam · Posted

      Bro I don't mind debating you, but did you really have to write all that to get your point across.   This isn't Madden. If you have the #1 pick you literally control your own destiny. If nobody wants to trade which I have a hard time believing they won't then you obviously take the best QB.   I think we will have suitors. If that's Madden then so be it.
×
×
  • Create New...