Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

NFCS Pass Protection Stats Thru 4 games


SBBlue
 Share

Recommended Posts

   Cmp     Att    Yds   PktTime      Sk   Hits   Hrry  
League  Avg 93 140 974 2.3 9 13 14  
      Panthers 99 146 1120 2.4 11 16 17  
        Falcons 108 161 931 2.3 8 20 11  
          Saints 58 90 576 2.5 7 12 9  
            Bucs 119 184 1310 1.7 7 5 9  

 

2021 NFL Advanced Stats | Pro-Football-Reference.com
The OL was horrible at Dallas   5 sacks, 6 Hits and 4 hurries (and that hurry number feels low).    The OL has performed worse each game.  The trendline is NOT good.  

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Davidson Deac II said:

The ironic thing was that we did establish the run.  For most of the first half, we were getting 5-10 yards per attempt.  

We had 113 yards rushing, but 35 of those were Sam.  Chubba avg 4.4 yds. Compare that to Elliot at 7.2.  Our ybc is bad, at the bottom of the league.  

Our run D shows up this Sunday or we are about to be embarrassed.  Eagles have the highest ybc/att rate and more rushing yards than we do.  If they run all over us, it will be another long game.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, SBBlue said:

Our run D shows up this Sunday or we are about to be embarrassed.  Eagles have the highest ybc/att rate and more rushing yards than we do.  If they run all over us, it will be another long game.

I would imagine a lot can be attributed to Jalen Hurts...I feel like the speed of our LB's matches well against spying Hurts.  We shall see.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, SBBlue said:

We had 113 yards rushing, but 35 of those were Sam.  Chubba avg 4.4 yds. Compare that to Elliot at 7.2.  Our ybc is bad, at the bottom of the league.  

We were discussing establishing the run.  In the first half, we did establish the run.  Early in the game, we were ripping off decent runs.  

4
14
12
2
-1
7
4

Late in the second qtr, and into the third, Dallas adjusted, and shut down the run. And our offense couldn't compensate.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good grief…the god awful Falcons have 15 more att. and two categories close to average.

The Panthers fail miserably on all accounts.

Watching the Bucs line that sounds right, they’re beasts. I can only imagine there are only 2-3 teams worse than this.

So far, I’m pretty sure this is the worst oline in Panthers’ history.

Edited by onmyown
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, SBBlue said:
   Cmp     Att    Yds   PktTime      Sk   Hits   Hrry  
League  Avg 93 140 974 2.3 9 13 14  
      Panthers 99 146 1120 2.4 11 16 17  
        Falcons 108 161 931 2.3 8 20 11  
          Saints 58 90 576 2.5 7 12 9  
            Bucs 119 184 1310 1.7 7 5 9  

 

2021 NFL Advanced Stats | Pro-Football-Reference.com
The OL was horrible at Dallas   5 sacks, 6 Hits and 4 hurries (and that hurry number feels low).    The OL has performed worse each game.  The trendline is NOT good.  

Sack, hits, and hurrys  can be a bit misleading because some teams have more or less pass attempts then others.  


That same table has a pressure % number that accounts for that.

We are actually 8th worst in the entire league based on that.

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, onmyown said:

Good grief…the god awful Falcons have 15 more att. and two categories close to average.

The Panthers fail miserably on all accounts.

Watching the Bucs line that sounds right, they’re beasts. I can only imagine there are only 2-3 teams worse than this.

So far, I’m pretty sure this is the worst oline in Panthers’ history.

It having a QB with the 3rd quickest time to throw.  Their pocket time is non-existent.

Edited by SBBlue
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, SBBlue said:

It having a QB with the 3rd quickest time to throw.  Their pocket time is non-existent.

That’s why I referenced mainly to watching them. Feel free to watch them as well. When they need to block for a while they can, and do.

And just for shits, last year TB had a top 5 release time (400+ attempts) and still a below average ranked oline…lol

The team decided to address that by overpaying for two washed up, injured poo olineman and drafting a ‘second round graded’ guard and sitting him on the bench because we don’t want to maybe be worse than 28th ranked oline in the league by throwing rookies out there.

Edited by onmyown
  • Beer 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • LOL... Yet again proving you can't look below anything than what you see on the surface Mock drafts ARE NOT draft grades They are what people think will happen.  They are mocking teams taking QB's in the top 5 of the draft because that's just historically how drafts go regardless of the grades on the QBs.  Almost every draft expert, even those mocking QB's going high, have said time and time again that none of these QB's actually grade out as those type of picks. This is again, where I say you don't like to actually read what I have to say, because I already explained it. 2022 the exact same thing happened, mock drafts had guys like Pickett and Willis going in the Top 5 because that's just what teams usually do, but GM's listened to their prospect grades and knew they weren't worth taking that high, so they didn't. It's not to say QB's won't go that high this year, but it's to say that they aren't graded out as elite QB prospects.  Mock drafts 
    • Have you seen the mock drafts lately?   Most of them have us taking a QB. Just because you aren't high on these QBs doesn't mean the Panthers or other teams aren't.   If you want me to be real I just think you a Tmac homer and all you care about is us drafting him. It's why you get so defensive when people mention other prospects.   Be open to other people's ideas. Nobody in this thread is saying anything bad about your boy Tmac. 
    • Oh good lord Interest doesn't mean interest in making a bad trade to take the player, that's why I had such a long post, to accurately describe why those are two different things, but you don't like to listen to that stuff.  Being interested in a player doesn't live in a vacuum. It's very simple... there isn't a #1 draft pick type of grade on any of these QB's, if there was, we'd just take them.  You can't bluff a pick everyone knows you won't make, and trying to trade the pick is the CLEAR signal that you're not taking the QB. Just because the Raiders would have interest, doesn't mean they're going to bail us out of a situation we don't want to be in, they'd be smart about it and just sit put, let us take a non QB as we'd be telling the world we're not taking one just by trying to trade the pick, and then they'd take him at #2 (either with their own pick or by trading less to get that one). Oh, and your point of "if nobody is willing to make the trade, you obviously just take the best QB" is quite literally the dumbest thing I've ever read on here. If nobody is willing to trade up to take the QB, then it's OBVIOUS that the QB isn't worth taking with that pick, so OBVIOUSLY taking the best QB there is just OBVIOUSLY stupid and a bad pick. The moral of it is if there is a QB worth taking, we're taking them and not making the trade.  If there isn't a QB worth taking there, nobody is trading up to #1 to take one, we just showed the NFL how bad of an idea that is 2 years ago, it's really not hard to see. You keep making up this mythical situation where there is a QB who has shown to be worth trading up to #1 for and we'll be able to leverage that into a trade.  But we're the most QB needy team in the league, if we end up with the #1 pick, either we are taking a QB #1 or no QB is going #1 unless we get VERY lucky and two teams in the Top 5 fall in love with one prospect and we can play them off each other and fleece one of them. But again, I can't see that happening, as if there was a QB worthy of that, we're just taking him ourselves.
×
×
  • Create New...