Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

That's The Season


TylerDurden
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, stbugs said:

Right but when we were up 16-0 and 17-0 at half when the offense looked good early, that helped the D as well. It goes both ways. I’m not saying the offense is better than the D, but the D has no reason to be defeated after the O got 11 points in four minutes to force OT. The D just got rolled in OT. We had to at least hold them to a FG to have a chance.

I think the D is well ahead of the O, which makes sense with the FAs/draft picks, but acting like the O has somehow made the D not play well is missing the really poor plays. If you can’t win 2 games scoring 28 points then the D had a bad game and 534 rushing yards and 5 rushing TDs is inexcusably bad.

I look at it this way, if you had told me before week 4 that we’d score 28, 18 and 28 points in weeks 4-6 without CMC, I’d think the O did pretty well and with our D we’d win 2, maybe 3. Losing all 3 would require the D to fall apart.

Again, I agree they had to have been bad all day to give up 500+ yards of offense and the points we gave up, but that OT drive they absolutely were gassed.  They had just been on the field for the last drive before the missed FG and then came right back and had to stop them on the first possession of OT.  And that was after having had to be on the field almost the entirety of the 2nd half because the offense couldn't sustain a drive until the last one of the game.

I do believe as much as there is invested on that side, they have to make a play and get us off the field at some point, but there is no form of complementary football on the other side of the ball whatsoever.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, Proudiddy said:

Ahh yes, "cooter."  I remember 3rd grade well.  Enjoy your Capri Sun.

There was actually a kid named Cooter...you might be a redneck if

oh also I remember like
Rusty
Rhett
 

You in for some neck reddening surrounded by names like at. Who names their kid Rusty.

Edited by Fox007
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

A Blind man could see this season unfolding the way it is.........from the beginning in preseason I have stated: 

1) Team has never prioritized developing a good O line and it is the weak link of the offense.

2) Darnold is a game manager at best.........

3) Defense is quick, light and gets punched in the mouth easy by a power offense.

4) Coaching stuff doesn't realize this isn't college.,,,,,NFL teams figure out what you are doing faster than you can adjust.......

5) This team would win 6 games this year. 

I stay with these statements..........

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've been watching this team long enough to not get too emotionally invested. Second year with a new staff, awful O-line, injuries to key positions, etc. Though we were still at least a year away when the season started and it's starting to look that way, unfortunately.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Proudiddy said:

If saying you comparing my mother's genitalia to a hot pocket and calling it a "cooter" in the process is your definition of "besting," then sure.  

A lot better than you doubling down on the weak ass “moms basement”

Not to mention this pathetic thread and your more pathetic account

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No you dont.  He had all those records for years before his final season. Whether career or season he had them all years before his final season in which he played 6 games.
    • Williams covered for Moore by saying they were on the wrong page about Moores specific route. Williams could have easily covered for him by saying he messed up. Suggesting only 1 route was ever intended to be a viable target is absurd.
    • I am going to agree with Linville this time--I think we need to get a veteran edge (We have Jones II, Scourton, and Princely--2 developmental guys and a decent veteran).  We don't really think of Jones because he had a hamstring injury weeks 3 and 4 and a back that required surgery Week 6-17.  He still managed 10 pressures, and he will be 28.  Princely Umanmielen only played in approximately 18-20% of the snaps and he struggled at times.  Basically, he was a situational pass rusher.  He got 1.5 sacks and 10 pressures.  He should improve, but for now, he is what he is.  Scourton gives us hope.  For a rookie (and thanks to Jones II's injuries, he was given more PT), he had 8 sacks--and held the edge.  He played at a first-round draft pick level.  He has the potential to become "that guy" in 2026. We lose Wonnum, who played nearly 700 snaps and amassed 3 whole sacks.  For a person raised a Gamecock, I would not be upset if we purged our roster of all South Carolina alumni.   However, I see it this way:  Wonnum was decent holding the edge, something Patrick Jones II and Scourton have demonstrated at a high level.  He is a liability, if you ask me.    Jones had 7 sacks one season in Minnesota and is known for his inside rushing ability--not what you would call a speed rusher.  I think Princely was a bit disappointing, but he was a bit raw.  Out of college, they described him as being a bit predictable.  I see no reason he will not improve in 2026 and become a situational pass rusher.   Basically, with Scourton and Princely expected to continue to develop and Jones II returning from injury, I think we need another veteran (if we can get a good one) to give us balance and depth.  A third developmental player is not ideal.   Draft:  OT, LB, WR, OL depth, S. Free Agency:  Edge, possibly a WR;  re-sign Mays, Cuhran, BC (??), and Nijman.  Let walk:  Wonnum, Scott, Dowdle.  I see about $20m per year after signing the OL depth.  Spend it on a veteran edge.   Players like Reddick (Tampa), Bosa (Buffalo), Khalil Mack (LAC) could be available on a one or two year deal in the $15m range.  We could splurge here, but I think a veteran situational pass rusher (depending on Jones II's back) is all we need while our 2 young guns develop.    
×
×
  • Create New...