Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Bench PJ!


Shotgun
 Share

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, Pantherxtreme said:

PJ came in the game when we had to pass to get back in it. Easy for the defense to pin the ears back. 

I'm sure we would have scored more than 3 had he played the entire game. 

The Donald experience needs to be over.  

Dude couldn’t hit the ground with it. He was so inaccurate if he played a whole game he might throw multiple pick 6s. He doesn’t belong on a nfl roster. Only reason he’s here is he played at temple 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We don’t have a competent QB on the roster. We need to either trade for one in the offseason, or draft one with our 1st.  This is a terrible draft for QBs, so I’m fine with trading for one. Whoever we trade for needs to be a sure fire thing, though, and has proven himself. No more of these reclamation projects.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

And PJ 100% should get the start next week vs Atlanta.

You don’t only evaluate the play and outcome of inserting someone into pass only situations with guys that have already accepted defeat. 

we saw that last year with PJ.  He was much better in his lone start than thrown in late and forced to be on one dimensional pass downs. 

and if he sucks in his start….go to the kid on the practice squad.  You got to end the Sam experiment though.  Staff has to acknowledge what they did going in to this season and officially move on from that mistake. 

  • Pie 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, AggieLean said:

We don’t have a competent QB on the roster. We need to either trade for one in the offseason, or draft one with our 1st.  This is a terrible draft for QBs, so I’m fine with trading for one. Whoever we trade for needs to be a sure fire thing, though, and has proven himself. No more of these reclamation projects.

Also, there’s no need to resign Gilmore. We need that potential 3rd he can bring us. We also need to try and get back in the 2nd. CMC should be on the block.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, CRA said:

And PJ 100% should get the start next week vs Atlanta.

You don’t evaluate play of a guy inserting into pass only situations with guys that have already accepted defeat. 

we saw that last year with PJ.  He was much better in his lone start than thrown in late and forced to be on one dimensional pass downs. 

and if sucks in his start….go to the kid on the practice squad.  You got to end the Sam experiment though.  Staff has to acknowledge what they did going on to this season and officially move on from that mistake. 

Wait,…are you saying to evaluate PJ as the long term starter…?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, CRA said:

And PJ 100% should get the start next week vs Atlanta.

You don’t only evaluate the play and outcome of inserting someone into pass only situations with guys that have already accepted defeat. 

we saw that last year with PJ.  He was much better in his lone start than thrown in late and forced to be on one dimensional pass downs. 

and if he sucks in his start….go to the kid on the practice squad.  You got to end the Sam experiment though.  Staff has to acknowledge what they did going in to this season and officially move on from that mistake. 

He could start. Won’t change anything. We need a real QB. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Monrowed said:

Wait,…are you saying to evaluate PJ as the long term starter…?

No.  I’m not saying that.   

you would simply use it to evaluate if he is worth being the backup QB.  And the answer is likely no.  But it answers it for the world to see.  The point is too move on from Sam.  And if PJ sucks, you evaluate the practice squad kid.  Not to be the starter…but to simply see if there is any point of having them in the building. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Varking said:

He could start. Won’t change anything. We need a real QB. 

It will prevent this staff from having the option of trotting Sam back out there next year.   Be done with him.  
 

it’s not about PJ being the guy.  It’s about ending the Sam experiment.  And forcing this staff to acknowledge the mistake and prevent them from doing the same thing again next year.  Quit bringing in these established scrub QBs. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, CRA said:

It will prevent this staff from having the option of trotting Sam back out there next year.   Be done with him.  
 

it’s not about PJ being the guy.  It’s about ending the Sam experiment.  And forcing this staff to acknowledge the mistake and prevent them from doing the same thing again next year.  Quit bringing in these established scrub QBs. 

Neither one of them should be on this roster next year. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I mean, I think you're being a little hyperbolic with the last statement, but point taken. 
    • Pass rush was the biggest issue in tonight’s game, and we were tied for 28th in sacks this season. That is a major area of need that has to get addressed this offseason. I just don’t see a path where there’s a game changing QB you can bring in with where we are drafting and quality of veterans that will be available. We certainly can do better than Dalton as a backup, and should ideally have a developmental guy  (perhaps a day 3 pick this year). We have bryce for one more year on a reasonable contract and then I think 2027 is the year that you reset that position (unless he massively improves).
    • Agreed, honestly basically bringing this group back as a healthy unit would be alright.  Brady Christensen should be resigned to a very reasonable deal with him recovering from the Achilles.  Atleast we're alright at 4 of our 5 spots with Lewis, Mays, Hunt, and Moton, Nijman was decent.  While if we can snag a deal on someone, take a stab, however our resources need to go to Linebacker, Pass Rush and a real option outside Tmac (coker is amazing, but if we can get someone who isnt braindead opposite Tmac, we can fully unleash Coker AND Tmacs full potential, cant move him into the slot if racoon boy is out there licking doorknobs).
×
×
  • Create New...