Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Trade CMC


ncsu12engr
 Share

Recommended Posts

15 hours ago, frankw said:

Idk that contract is an albatross and he has to show he can be healthy for more than 2 or 3 games. What a horrific panic move that was with NO QUARTERBACK in sight. Can't believe that blew up in our faces.

His contract is not that bad

his ability to stay on the field is terrible 

what could we get for him?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cmac is a high valued trade asset… see the difference when he is on the field then off 3-0 to 0-4 without him …. That being said I think he is part of the package for Watson.. I think he was purposely held out to trade deadline for that reason and the fact that he will be ready to make big push in the 2nd half in the new extended schedule season  …. Don’t know why Watson would come here over Mia without cmac tho… who knows …..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, ncsu12engr said:

If CMC comes back and has a good 2nd half of the season we should trade him while we can still get good value for him. 

He doesn’t really have trade value.  He is highly paid RB that can’t stay healthy. 

RB is the easiest position to solve on the cheap.   

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Tbe said:

We should but it wont. E easy. His contract is not attractive.

People keep talking about his contract. His contract is not that bad. It's maybe 2 or 3 mil more per year than other top backs in the league. The problem is his ability to stay on the field. If someone believes that he'll get over these nagging injuries (which is not outside the realm of believability), then that contract will stop nothing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I was playing around with the ESPN playoff predictor and it shows if 49ers and Rams finish with same record, the Rams hold the tiebreaker.     
    • This is my thinking as well. Seattle played as good as they could on defense and Panthers still had a chance until those back to back turnovers.  I don't think the Rams played particularly well in their game against us, alot things went our way in order to win.  Someone pointed out the Rams were bad on the east coast road games and Seattle has been the better road team but they just fought a hard contested game against the Panthers, and now they travel to San Fran this week for their biggest game of the season to determine the division and if they are the overall #1 seed in the NFC or will be traveling for the Wildcard weekend.  If they lose they then travel back cross the country to play a team they've just beaten two weeks ago, not saying they won't be favored against the Panthers but the energy of hosting our first playoff game in 10 years along with the get back effect of having just lost to this team could be huge. 
    • I don’t know about shadowing and all that, but according to this, whatever we are doing is working 
×
×
  • Create New...