Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Rapoport believes Watson will be traded before the deadline


t96
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Jon Snow said:

Only the loud minority want it.  They would sell their souls for a game.

you would think by now those people would learn.

They have spent years wantng us to be paper champs and win the off season and make flashy hires.

Tepper gave them that with Matt Rhule hire and Joe brady as OC also Fitts won the draft and offseason with his trades got everyone talking and media buzzing same as the bucs did for years before Brady.

now they want the new shiny toy in Watson lol.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Jon Snow said:

Twitter dumbasses do not bolster your argument. 

If we get him, BofA will be packed to the rim with cheering fans in the first home game he starts. The actual minority will be people who stop rooting for the team if we do land him. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Panthers12211981 said:

you would think by now those people would learn.

They have spent years wantng us to be paper champs and win the off season and make flashy hires.

Tepper gave them that with Matt Rhule hire and Joe brady as OC also Fitts won the draft and offseason with his trades got everyone talking and media buzzing same as the bucs did for years before Brady.

now they want the new shiny toy in Watson lol.

 

No, we want a true, game changing franchise Quarterback. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Fox007 said:

Oh poo I didn't realize Watson wanted it public and the defendants didn't want it public....
 

A lot of people don't know that. They see one bad thing (in this case 22 lol) next to someone's name and boom, they are guilty in their eyes. Watson could've been cleared this with the settlement. He wants to clear his name.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, joemac said:

No, we want a true, game changing franchise Quarterback. 

It's all about risk. With Watson you're giving up a huge amount for a guy who has a very real chance of not playing for a long time.

On the other hand you can roll the dice on a young QB in the draft.

At this point in time I think it's a better idea to roll the dice in the draft.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

Only the loud minority want it.  They would sell their souls for a game.

Deshaun Watson is going to play football again.  That is a 100% fact.  So we should be okay with the league letting him play, just as long as he doesn't play for our team?  Because that is what it boils down to.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Madwolf said:

It's all about risk. With Watson you're giving up a huge amount for a guy who has a very real chance of not playing for a long time.

On the other hand you can roll the dice on a young QB in the draft.

At this point in time I think it's a better idea to roll the dice in the draft.

I think if we do somehow end up getting him, then Tepper will have done his homework with the league and verified that there is no suspension on the horizon.  He does not strike me as the type of guy to just hope it goes his way in a situation like this where the stakes are so high. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, joemac said:

Totally with you there.  We should have just kept Cam and called it a day.  We would not be having any of these conversations right now.  

If we properly managed Cam... like protected him and handled his injuries correctly... maybe we'd still have him today. But we don't want the Cam Newton today. 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would Morgan or Beason have been HOFers' if injuries hadn't derailed their careers?  I was not a close watcher of the game when Morgan was in his prime but I thought Beason had a few seasons at close to Lukes' level of play.
    • Franchise QBs feast when things are rolling and the tide that raises boats when things are going sideways.  Bryce isn't that. He's a complimentary player, that's it.  When the defense and STs are on point, he plays loose and it shows.  When we are in a dog fight and things haven't gone our way, he struggles.  It's that simple. He's not a horrible QB, but he's not top tier either.  So the question begs, is this worthy of a second contract?  The answer should be no.  It definitely is my answer. Bryce will never be a QB that can produce wins largely on his arm.  That's a FRANCHISE QB, any other QB is simply a placeholder at the starter's position until that guy can be found.   At some point the excuses of lack of weapons will be a straw man.  Heck, it's nearly there now.  I mean if he doesn't look even better than last year will we blame it on the TE position?  'Well if Bryce only had a player like Kelce, Kittle or Gronk on this team...'  Are we really going to do that?  
    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
×
×
  • Create New...