Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Would you?


Cdparr7
 Share

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, onmyown said:

can anyone name a FA olineman the Panthers have signed that’s played more than one average or above year? it would be zero years if it weren’t for Oher?

you’ll need a poo ton of picks to fix this oline not just one third and one second rounder the next few years after we get raped for a few firsts and a second

and that’s not considering the defense, the defense isn’t deep outside of CB, see how awful they play without Shaq? replacing them won’t be easy either

We don't use the picks on OL is the problem. Especially in the 1st-3rd rounds. That's literally why we continue to suck at OL. The defense is relatively deep in most areas outside LB. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

The Rams definitely have better coaching.

You can fix the OL without 1st round draft picks. That's why our lack of investment in that area over the past 20 years is so fuging upsetting. You can get quality starters on the OL in the 1st, 2nd and 3rd round draft picks. At one point I posted an article here in the Huddle about how an analysis of draft picks showed that the highest success rate for any position in the first three rounds was OL. 

Now, you can also build through free agency, as well but that can get pretty expensive. Especially since the league is seeing a dearth of quality OL play.

So let’s say Watson is three firsts and a second and the defense isn’t touched, you’ll have four picks in the next 3 years in the first 3 rounds; three 3rds and one 2nd.

So the logic is this franchise says screw any other part of the team we will draft 4 olineman in the next 3 years and it’ll be ready by 2026 for Watson? That’s best case scenario and this team hitting those picks.

I mean this is just funny thinking. Not saying you, just in general. 

People want to say TB and Darnold were franchise crippling risks but they really weren’t, this however is the definition of just that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Cdparr7 said:

Trade Derrick Brown, Jaycee Horn, and Brian Burns for Deshaun Watson?

Because that’s how much 3 first rounders are worth.

People keep complaining about the 3 1st round picks and keep bringing up those guys. We have those guys and are 3-4 and on a 4 game losing streak with our latest loss to the 1-5 Giants. We have those 3 guys but it doesn’t matter. It doesn’t matter who you have if you don’t have an elite QB. 
 

Show me the drafts where we drafted an elite QB and I’ll show you 1. That’s 2011 and that’s it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, onmyown said:

So let’s say Watson is three firsts and a second and the defense isn’t touched, you’ll have four picks in the next 3 years in the first 3 rounds; three 3rds and one 2nd.

So the logic is this franchise says screw any other part of the team we will draft 4 olineman in the next 3 years and it’ll be ready by 2026 for Watson? That’s best case scenario and this team hitting those picks.

I mean this is just funny thinking. Not saying you, just in general. 

People want to say TB and Darnold were franchise crippling risks but they really weren’t, this however is the definition of just that.

You also aren't considering free agency or the ability to move players via trade to regain draft capital. Given the youth of our core, we will likely be making very tough personnel decisions in the next 1-4 years because we just can't simply keep everyone, although the Saints seem to be able to figure that out.

Plus, we always have the ability to sign in free agency, as long as it isn't for more bums like Elflein and Erving. TB and Darnold have actively been harmful because they have actively lost us games. Franchise crippling has been the lack of OL investment over the past 20 years. That was franchise crippling.

Getting a franchise QB is not something I would consider franchise crippling, unless he has some career ending injury. Then we are talking franchise crippling.

Furthermore, this price we are all speculating on is almost certainly not real, unless Tepper gets all hot and bothered and we overpay like we did for Darnold. The Texans reportedly want this done by the trade deadline(Nov. 2). That pretty much cuts their negotiating ability down if they actually mean that. If that is a hard date, we may be able to get him far cheaper than they want for him. Or, that could all be pure BS and they are just trying to stir up a bidding war. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Cdparr7 said:

Right so use the money/picks to build around Darnold or draft a QB to compete with him. And still use the money for an OL. Logical route.

Donald inherited two 1000 yard receivers when he came to this team and he can't get the ball to them. He threw for 111 yards last game, how much building does he need? A probowler at every position to succeed. 

If we got Watson this oline will look much better than they do now. They didn't look this bad last season with pretty much the same lineup. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, onmyown said:

can anyone name a FA olineman the Panthers have signed that’s played more than one average or above year? it would be zero years if it weren’t for Oher?

you’ll need a poo ton of picks to fix this oline not just one third and one second rounder the next few years after we get raped for a few firsts and a second

and that’s not considering the defense, the defense isn’t deep outside of CB, see how awful they play without Shaq? replacing them won’t be easy either

I didn't read the whole thread, so what is your plan of action? What do you want the Panthers to do? Draft o-linemen and LBs for the next two seasons and stick with Darnold?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Shocker said:

If the Panthers make this trade it is going to be super hard to get this OL filled out.  No way around it.  I mean maybe we can spend big bucks on a LT and C but things would have to fall well for us.  The draft this year would be pretty barren

It isn't super hard to find OL talent in the first three rounds. It just seems to be for this franchise. Take a look at the OL drafted in the 1st through 3rd rounds of the last decade and you are going to see a LOT of All Pro, Pro Bowl and quality starters in that group. 

Panthers fans only believe this is difficult because historically we have sucked so royally at it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Cdparr7 said:

Trade Derrick Brown, Jaycee Horn, and Brian Burns for Deshaun Watson?

Because that’s how much 3 first rounders are worth.

Not only is that a poor hill to die on, but when was the last time any of those guy’s singlehandedly won us a game?

Exactly. A franchise QB does that for us. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, kungfoodude said:

It isn't super hard to find OL talent in the first three rounds. It just seems to be for this franchise. Take a look at the OL drafted in the 1st through 3rd rounds of the last decade and you are going to see a LOT of All Pro, Pro Bowl and quality starters in that group. 

Panthers fans only believe this is difficult because historically we have sucked so royally at it.

Right…but we would have no picks in the first 3 rounds.  It is going to be hard to fix WITH our first rounder.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Harbingers said:

and WR’s and Coaching and Strength and Conditioning and RB’s. This a systemic problem. Don’t kid yourself. Come watch some canes games, we miss you in chat. 

I was watching tonight. 5-0, baby! 

I was so pissed off at the goalie moves but this Anderson dude is making a believer out of me. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, pantherj said:

I didn't read the whole thread, so what is your plan of action? What do you want the Panthers to do? Draft o-linemen and LBs for the next two seasons and stick with Darnold?

 

Would’ve like Stafford. Or the team have the competency to draft a QB. Looks like Jones was overlooked. Could’ve even traded down for him. 
 

Could build like Buffalo did, Chiefs did, 49ers have in the past. Build a legit team and get your guy when the opportunity presents itself. That isn’t trading the future for someone with legal issues and big cap number. There are many paths to the end goal. Watson isn’t the ONLY solution.  This clearly reeks of desperation, and Panthers may be desperate but doesn’t mean keep making dumb moves.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Then don't tune in. It's really not a hard concept to understand, if your making your decision based on your own personal needs/feelings as opposed to what is best for the future of the franchise, then it's a you problem, not a Panthers problem. When the season is already lost, every fan should be rooting for the same thing.  The team plays hard until the final whistle of the season and keeps improving as a team and individually, but in the end, we still come up short and lose games, and preferably because the other team beat us, not because we screwed up and found a way to lose due to our own fault. Look at it this way... If we are up 1 or 2 points with 3 seconds left in the game and the other team is lining up for a FG.  Beyond the joy of victory or the disappointment of defeat, what impact does the other team making or missing the FG have on our team the following season? ABSOLUTELY NOTHING Except where we draft and what teams we play due to our finish in the division. The players and coaches on the team would have the exact same level of improvement and learnings about themselves individually and as a team whether the FG is made or missed.  The ONLY difference in the end is the record in the standings and if the win or loss number changes. If you want to argue if making the playoffs to lose in the first round or just missing them is better or worse, that's totally fair and I can at least understand the other side of it.  But in what is already a lost season, if you're not hoping your team plays well but ends up losing, then you're cutting off your nose to spite your face.  You're hoping for a moment of happiness at the detriment of the franchise's future, and in turn, you're basically then happy for a moment to only set yourself up for future further disappointment.
    • If we’re eliminated I want the wins more.   The season is already a disappointment and if I’m not pulling for wins why bother to tune in?
    • Two things terribly wrong with this post. First is that not one time has myself or anyone else agreeing with me said that the team themselves should think that way or try and lose for positioning.  Never once have I suggested the team should purposefully lose games, ever.  I honestly can't understand why people keep saying this in posts, not one fan has ever said the players should or would purposefully try to lose. And second, is yes, that has happened and it's happened very recently.  The 2020 Bengals were 4-11-1 and then were playing in the SB the very next season.   And while it might have been 2 years later and they didn't quite get to the SB, the 2021 Lions were 3-13-1 and then the 2023 Lions were up 24-7 at halftime of the NFC Championship game. The season between those two? They finished 9-8 and only just missed the playoffs. Which is why I keep trying to compare us to the Lions in where we are at in our re-build.  Throw out Bryce's rookie year with the Reich staff who just didn't work out and he looked god awful.   This past season when we were 5-12 in Canales' 1st season is that 2021 season for the Lions and their 1st season under Campbell.  This year is their 2022 where they grew a ton and Campbell's culture building was clear, where I'm saying we'd likely be better off in the long run if we go 8-9 or 9-8 and just miss out on the playoffs (which is still a significant improvement from last year).  Then our 2026 is their 2024 when we have a chance to be a real contender after adding a few more pieces and our key players having another year of experience under their belts.
×
×
  • Create New...