Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

This “analytics” conditioning is garbage


The Question
 Share

Recommended Posts

Go check out how well the Charlotte Hornets have done in the drafts since they got rid of that stupid “analytic genius” Rich Cho at GM for one who has the eye talent for good players. 
 

Rich Cho’s picks: Kemba, MKG**, Zeller**, Vonleh**, Kaminsky**, Monk**   (**bust)

 

Mitch Kupchak: Bridges, PJ, LaMelo, Bouknight/Kai (too early) 


 

David Tepper is such a stupid sport owner. When he finally realize that this is football and not the stock market where math/analytic doesn’t play a big part in, we’ll start winning. 
 

  • Beer 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, The Question said:

Second season in a row where we’ve been completely battered with injuries and they’re all the same type, every strength and conditioning coach needs to be removed. They’re obviously not getting these guys ready, Roy goes down now. Who answers to this?

Fire David Tepper. He’s the one that thinks football is the same as the stock market. 

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, SmokinwithWilly said:

Players are demanding more and more of their bodies. The harder you push, the more likely you're going to have something break. 

That’s not true. Tom Brady recently spoke about it a couple days ago saying the NFL is making football soft. Light practices, no more hitting, etc are reasons why these players are getting hurt. Their bodies are not prepare for full contact on game day. Just like our little fan fest this year. Rhule had our players come out there pretty much in T-shirt and shorts. 

Edited by Squid Game
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Squid Game said:

That’s not true. Tom Brady recently spoke about it a couple days ago saying the NFL is making football soft. Light practices, no more hitting, etc are reasons why these players are getting hurt. Their bodies are not prepare for full contact on game day. Just like our little fan fest this year. Rhule had our players come out there pretty much in T-shirt and shorts. 

That's also an anecdotal take and not a fact based one. It is possible there is some veracity to it but thr general, "It's cause they're all pussies and don't get hit anymore" take also ignores that currently NFL players are also stressing their bodies much further than in the past. 

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Squid Game said:

That’s not true. Tom Brady recently spoke about it a couple days ago saying the NFL is making football soft. Light practices, no more hitting, etc are reasons why these players are getting hurt. Their bodies are not prepare for full contact on game day. Just like our little fan fest this year. Rhule had our players come out there pretty much in T-shirt and shorts. 

Tom brady saying the nfl is soft is peak irony.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Panther'sBigD said:

The same people that bitch about injuries keeping players out, also tend to bitch about the focus on player safety making football 'too soft.' 

Most of our major injuries this year came from non contact plays. The only thing prevented from making football "soft" as you say is concussions. 

So great comparison!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Article:  The Rams must love rookie defensive lineman Braden Fiske, because they paid the Panthers a fortune to move up in the second round and draft him. To move up from No. 52 to No. 39 and draft Fiske, the Rams gave up the 155th overall pick in this year’s draft, as well as the Rams’ second-round pick in next year’s draft. That’s a rare price to pay, for a move up of just 13 spots in the second round. In fact, according to Seth Walder of ESPN Analytics, the Rams overpaid by the most any team has overpaid to move up on Day Two of the draft in at least the last six years. Ultimately, the Rams used two second-round picks and a fifth-round pick on Fiske. That’s a lot to spend. For the Panthers, it’s a great deal that nets them a second-round pick next year in addition to Jonathon Brooks, the running back the Panthers drafted after making another trade that packaged the two picks they got from the Rams. The Panthers didn’t have a 2025 second-round pick, having shipped it to Chicago in last year’s Bryce Young trade, but now they have a second-round pick after making a good trade on Friday. https://www.nbcsports.com/nfl/profootballtalk/rumor-mill/news/rams-paid-a-big-price-in-trade-with-panthers-to-move-up-13-spots-for-braden-fiske
    • Yeah I don’t think I’d like this guy outside, he doesn’t fit that in the NFL.  I think he needs to stick to nickel and ST to help the defense, he’d probably contribute. I think he’d be a liability outside. I like him okay though, looking forward to seeing him.  Actually that is probably how I feel about all the picks, I like them okay and am looking forward to seeing them. I feel like they were taken for a good reason; though I may not see it yet. One shouldn’t expect to go straight down the line hit every one, butI think we’ll hit on a couple of guys in this group. 4 would be great.  
    • i know, but to a degree to can still apply, imo. yes, the guy is a unicorn. crazy circumstances and situations i think kept him away from opportunity to prove themselves for a longer period of time. and in that he and cam are similar. cam took a couple years before he was put in a situation to show what he could do given then opportunity. same wit XL. different circumstances, for sure, but really they were drafted based on one one year of production where they looked dominant. does that mean he's going to be the cam newton of WRS? probably not.  one of the arguments against cam was that he had only one year of "real" production at a high level and those arguments were furthered by the lack of people who had transitioned into a legit starter after so little starting experience.  they were/are both unicorns. 
×
×
  • Create New...