Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Things are not well on Mint Street.

Zod

By Zod,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

TylerDurden Grand Master

TylerDurden

Posted
Posted
13 minutes ago, TheRumGone said:

Darnold and Teddy are good players?

we had 4 1k yards from scrimmage skill position players with someone who could actually run the offense but couldn’t stretch the field. 
 

you literally just said Darnold can’t do poo. So what is Brady suppose to do?

The point being that Teddy looked underwhelming in the same system.  The skill players could rack up all the yards after the catch because Teddy is accurate and quick to get the ball out to the open read, so they got tons of YAC.  But, as you pointed out he couldn't stretch the field either.  And even with Teddy, the offense was abysmal in the redzone and goal to go situations.  Brady and Rhule tried to pin the offensive struggles on Teddy, while Teddy pointed out their shortcomings, which many felt was just sour grapes at the time.  If Teddy looked subpar in this system, and Darnold went from bad to possibly the worst QB to ever play in the NFL in the same system, then the problem is the system and the coaching implementing it.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
BlitzMonster Mentor

BlitzMonster

Posted
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Proudiddy said:

The point being that Teddy looked underwhelming in the same system.  The skill players could rack up all the yards after the catch because Teddy is accurate and quick to get the ball out to the open read, so they got tons of YAC.  But, as you pointed out he couldn't stretch the field either.  And even with Teddy, the offense was abysmal in the redzone and goal to go situations.  Brady and Rhule tried to pin the offensive struggles on Teddy, while Teddy pointed out their shortcomings, which many felt was just sour grapes at the time.  If Teddy looked subpar in this system, and Darnold went from bad to possibly the worst QB to ever play in the NFL in the same system, then the problem is the system and the coaching implementing it.

Teddy's bounce back in Denver this season also adds more evidence that last year's problems weren't just because of him. 

Last year Teddy was 23rd in QB rating among starting QB's.  This year he's 10th.  And he didn't just magically become a lot better in 12 months.  

It was the Carolina coaches and their poor fitting  / ill designed system which led to Teddy's low 2020 rating.  

Edited by BlitzMonster
  • Pie 2
  • Beer 2
  • The D 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Luciu5 Veteran

Luciu5

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, BlitzMonster said:

Teddy's bounce back in Denver this season also adds more evidence that last year's problems weren't just because of him. 

Last year Teddy was 23rd in QB rating among starting QB's.  This year he's 10th.  And he didn't just magically become a lot better in 12 months.  

It was the Carolina coaches and their poor fitting  / ill designed system which led to Teddy's low 2020 rating.  

I'm not sure if it's the system so to speak.  Teddy moved the ball fine.  It was mostly dump offs, but it worked and we obviously racked up yardage.  Red zone was about 100% of the problem and without TD's, that will kill a QBs rating and screws up the TD/int ratio that factors in and QB's are often judged off of.  I think it may have been more the play calling.

The only thing that does give me pause however is the longer throws.  He seems to have no issues this year compared to last year.  I am not sure what to think of that.  Looking at stats now though, his air yards is slightly higher this year, but his QBR is actually quite a bit lower.  TD's is significantly higher, but otherwise his stats are all very, very similar this year to last.  Outside of TD's, he definitely looks better this year, but statwise, only somewhat.

tldr - So after all those words, I think it's not the system, just was the play calling or play design in the red zone.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
rippadonn Grand Master

rippadonn

Posted
Posted
6 hours ago, Proudiddy said:

Was telling a non-Panther-fan friend about his struggles recently, and mentioned how now, even when he scrambles and completely gets away from the pressure, he'll still elect to run it for a short gain over throwing it to a playmaker like DJ who comes open to the side he is scrambling on, just so he won't have to throw it.  He plays scared, and it has nothing to do with pressure...  he doesn't trust what he's seeing or doing on any given play.  When in the pocket, he can't read the defense or process it well enough to be sure of the throw he needs to make, and it is just as evident even when he gets out of the pocket.  

There is no fixing that.  If guys don't have the mental aspect of QBing, they aren't ever going to succeed, no matter who the coach is or the personnel around them.

Missing the clutch gene. You've got to be a raging fire, unwilling to back down or give up. Jake had it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • L-TownCat
      Report: Panthers great Luke Kuechly being eyed for big TV job

      By L-TownCat · Posted

      So the last guy who had the job got hired by his former team directly into a role he has no direct experience in?
    • Khyber53
      Report: Panthers great Luke Kuechly being eyed for big TV job

      By Khyber53 · Posted

      Hard to pass up millions for a couple of days work per week for a coaching gig in the NFL that is 60-80 hours each week during the season and a more relaxed 50 hours a week during the off season. Yeah, I'd love to see him as our DC but hard to see him giving up the cushy job there if he gets it. And he's going to be a great commentator for the network.
    • Khyber53
      2027: Sharing my thoughts on the cap without a lotta research

      By Khyber53 · Posted

      Really, I think that is where negotiations come in. If you've got a QB getting you to 10 wins but statistically he's not a great performer, then you say look you can take $22 million or you can try it on the market. Because let's face it, out there, any leadership skills that we're seeing aren't going to be on the table, it's just going to be performance and that lands him in the QB2 market, which is much, much less lucrative (although any of us would love that money).  No one is saying that Bryce will be a $50 million QB, barring something short of a miraculous jump. I'm just saying that if we are winning somehow with him at the helm, then it would be fuging stupid to dive back into the rookie pool all over again. Let's say we do hit the 10 win mark, heck, let's call it 11 and a second round in the playoffs. I think we can all say that would be a really uplifting result and one that should be doable if we have good play. What do we do then? Here's what I would offer if I were Morgan and Tepper. $25 million a year for 3 years, each year with up to $10 million in incentives for touchdowns, wins, playoff depth, being under 10 interceptions, completing a full season, passing yardage milestones, taking less than 15 sacks. Look, Bryce isn't a Ferrari, he isn't a Corvette, or a mid-level BMW. He's probably a new Toyota Sienna that will definitely get you somewhere and bring the whole team along with it, no fuss but not a lot of pizazz.  And really, it's about the destination, not about what drove you there.
×
×
  • Create New...