Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

3/12 on 3rd and 4th


AU-panther
 Share

Recommended Posts

Everyone wants to talk about why we lost, but more times than not, turnovers and 3rd and 4th down efficiency will tell you who won a game.  

Its what separates good offenses, and good play callers, and good QBs from the rest.  Throwing it for 7 yards on 1st down is a lot easier than on 3 and 6 when the defense knows how far you need to get and they know a better idea of run or pass.

This offense looks decent at times when we stay ahead of the sticks but you can't count on that all of the time.  

How much of this is Brady?  or the QB?  or the line?

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, AU-panther said:

Everyone wants to talk about why we lost, but more times than not, turnovers and 3rd and 4th down efficiency will tell you who won a game.  

Its what separates good offenses, and good play callers, and good QBs from the rest.  Throwing it for 7 yards on 1st down is a lot easier than on 3 and 6 when the defense knows how far you need to get and they know a better idea of run or pass.

This offense looks decent at times when we stay ahead of the sticks but you can't count on that all of the time.  

How much of this is Brady?  or the QB?  or the line?

 

 

I’m Cam’s first game back he hit 6 receivers on 78% passing. Scored two TDs. Ran for 50 yards…on a defense that is very good even without Young.

 

The situational playcalling sucked. Period. If you want to win games then play to win. But calling a bunch of 5 yard out routes and checking down doesn’t work if your 3rd down efficiency is THAT bad and it wasn’t bc of incompletions. It was bc the routes that were completed weren’t enough to get the 1st down. So….that’s BAD play calling. 

Edited by unicar15
  • Pie 5
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, WOW!! said:

The number 2 fuging defense shouldn't give up 27 points to a Henkie led team ... 

Plain and simple...

If you can't score more than 21 points against the 5th worst defense in the league, at home, do you really think you are good enough to beat good teams in the playoff?

Everyone is letting todays bad day by the offense let them distract them from what the bigger problem is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, therealmjl said:

21 points at home should be enough to win when you have the “#2 defense”

Na in Today's NFL 21 points is below average

https://www.statmuse.com/nfl/ask/league-average-nfl-points-per-game-in-2021

Oh look where we rank!

3 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

The number 2 fuging defense shouldn't give up 27 points to a Henkie led team ... 

Plain and simple...

This isn't the 2nd ranked defense in the NFL. This is the padded our stats vs rookie QBs defense in the NFL.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, AU-panther said:

If you can't score more than 21 points against the 5th worst defense in the league, at home, do you really think you are good enough to beat good teams in the playoff?

Everyone is letting todays bad day by the offense let them distract them from what the bigger problem is.

The offense is only been together 8 days... Wtf do you expect??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, AU-panther said:

If you can't score more than 21 points against the 5th worst defense in the league, at home, do you really think you are good enough to beat good teams in the playoff?

Everyone is letting todays bad day by the offense let them distract them from what the bigger problem is.

The defense will bounce back. Could be as simple as it was just a bad matchup. The mediocre offensive production for the 20th straight week despite our QB completing 80% of his passes, running for 50 yards, no TOs and scoring two TDs….that’s still the problem. Some of the plays that Heinke made wouldn’t have been made 8/10 times. So some of it was just luck. That’ll get corrected and won’t be the case. Problem is our offense can’t ever bail us out of a bad situation and put up points. 

Edited by unicar15
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yea when teams see a gun charge they rightly pause but this seems like a big misunderstanding. 
    • Sorry man you lost me at "Teppers have evolved as owners". Limped into playoffs at 8-9 not even above .500 Tepper is trash as an owner bro and that's not even a discussion at this point. 37-83 w/l ratio. Nuff said.... Morgan tho, he's cooking and it ain't cuz of Teppers leadership
    • After listening to Morgan's presser twice, I came away with some key beliefs. First of all, I don't think he's a bullshitter. What you see is what you get. When he says something, he means it.  The Teppers really have evolved as owners. Morgan has mentioned how they're easy to work with--a pleasure to work with a few times now. There seems to be a good relationship between all of them (and include Dave Canales on that). We'll see if it lasts. Yes, no one wanted to come to Carolina with the previous management, but that seems to have changed. The team signed arguably the top Edge, LB and OT on the market, two of them on pretty good deals and one on what I'll say is "not a bad one." And, credit Sunshine Dave "Flowers and Cotton Candy" Canales for helping to change the culture. Morgan mentioned getting guys--and I'm paraphrasing--that are not only great football players but great people. Don't look for us to be acquiring any James Pearce types anytime soon, just saying. We'll see if that holds true in the future. Dan Morgan really has set up the Panthers to take the BPA/BAP. He mentioned it at least a couple of times, and he doesn't seem pressured to pinpoint a particular position. He just wants quality players that will help the team. This is how it's going to be (to your joy or dismay, probably for as long as he's here), and personally I love it. Many of us know how Morgan was when he played: aggressive! That's what he's going to be when making acquisitions. He explicitly said it, and emphasized it. All avenues are open (think FA, waivers...the draft)! Personally, as long as it's controlled aggression and not reckless aggression, I love it.  On KP: "Mobility is big in this league."  He basically says if another QB is the BPA while drafting--we're going by our board, people--we're going to add them.        ...  
×
×
  • Create New...