Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

A professional opinion (not mine)


PanthersATL
 Share

Recommended Posts

5 hours ago, hepcat said:

Their failure to roll the dice on a rookie QB makes me wonder if Joe Brady was the one that was hesitant to work with a rookie. Maybe his lack of experience made him want to work with a QB that already had some experience. I don't know. But it doesn't make any sense. Especially in the 2021 draft when you had two QB prospects that were worthy of the pick.

I don't think you ask for "final say on personnel" when you are getting hired and then hand over QB personnel decisions to an OC you don't have any ties to.

At the end of the day, personnel decisions are all Rhule. Coaching decisions are all Rhule. The decision to hire Rhule.....all Tepper.

  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This can also be compared to the military, where I spent 25 years. Everything starts and stops with the top, If a command is under-performing it’s due to a lack of leadership at high levels. At least 90% of the people I worked with and supervised wanted to do a good job, and with good leadership they did.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Had we gotten Stafford or Watson, much of this bemoaning is taken care of.

 

We didn't.  But that doesn't mean we won't try like hell again this offseason...one thing is a proven here, they will keep trying until the QB they want is in place.

I expect a hard push for a franchise guy this offseason....again.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, thefuzz said:

Had we gotten Stafford or Watson, much of this bemoaning is taken care of.

 

We didn't.  But that doesn't mean we won't try like hell again this offseason...one thing is a proven here, they will keep trying until the QB they want is in place.

I expect a hard push for a franchise guy this offseason....again.

I think that depends on how Cam looks the rest of the way. He's not 2015 Cam, but with barely any time to learn the playbook, he's already looked better than anyone we've had at QB since... Cam Newton.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, stbugs said:

I do have to say that I think the CEO/executives of a large company have way more to do with a company’s success than an NFL owner. Sure, there are meddling owners that can impact things but let’s be honest, many CEOs are people who founded the business or turned the company into what it is. NFL owners are typically not people who came up the NFL ranks. They are guys and gals who made their money elsewhere and bought the team.

The reason I say this is because outside of making the right hires, I think the coaching/GMs have way more sway over the team than the owner does. Since Tepper can be thought of as the evil rich guy, he’ll likely get a lot of flak but he’s a glorified cheerleader most of the time. He’s not preparing players for the game or setting defensive alignments. He may yell and give ultimatums like we are talking to Cam because our QBs suck, but we didn’t draft Fields. Again, owners can meddle and Tepper may, we don’t really know but I think coaching/GMs should be the top concern. Tepper being a hedge fund guy is not who decided to sign Teddy and then Sam. He may have forced Rhule’s hand on Cam but the team is where it is right now because of Rhule, Hurney and Fitterer. Hurney might not have had much of a role outside of his classic 2018/2019 drafts either, might have been all Rhule.

NFL teams have historically operated more like mom and pop shops than fortune 500 companies.  

I would wager, there are a lot of owners closer to the mold of Jerry Jones, Dan Synder, etc. than most realize.   They just don't seek the limelight and wish to be the face like them.  But behind the scenes? 

I mean, look at Jerry.  Publically, he looked like an old man that rode in golf cart looking at his toy investment.  And a camera would occassionally pan to him looking like he might fall asleep in the box.  He made a point to rarely talk to the press and have his name in people's mouth.  But behind the scenes? Jerry was a very impactful.  Not just with his team but the league.   And a massive part of Hurney's blunders that he takes all the blame for.....were simply doing what Jerry Richardson laid out.   The turning point in Hurney's GM job was around the lockout time.  That was JR IMO more than Hurney.  

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, PanthersATL said:

 

Good news? It seems to suggest we’re not totally off base with some of the threads we have going on around here.

"i talked to a guy for 3 minutes got told "it could be this or may be that" and have come to the conclusion that our angry takes might possibly be right or it could be literally anything else.

it's one of the two."

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, trueblade said:

I think that depends on how Cam looks the rest of the way. He's not 2015 Cam, but with barely any time to learn the playbook, he's already looked better than anyone we've had at QB since... Cam Newton.

Agreed. If his shoulder holds up down the stretch we have to bring him back. Even if we plan on drafting a QB in the 1st.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It is hard to win in the NFL. I’m never going to put an * next to a Dub.
    • We had a very favorable matchup our o-line manhandles theirs. Even Etienne looked like he would have had a great game on his limited rushing opportunities. 
    • I think that's part of the problem, he's spreading the ball around too much, many of them are the first read play calls, and on top of that, a large portion of them are purposefully called screens or other short passes. I just looked, the Cardinals are the only other team in the league right now without at least 3 players with 100+ yards receiving so far this year, with the majority of teams having 4 or more.  And even then, their #2 right now is McBride with over 200 yards. Our 2nd leading receiver this year has 108 yards (albeit with 4 more players with 82 or more). On the surface, that might not be as alarming as you might think, but when you add into it that Bryce is currently 6th in the league in pass attempts, and it's even more alarming that he hasn't gotten a 3rd player to 100 yards so far and his second highest is only 108. XL has 39 yards on 18 targets.  Renfrow has 82 yards on 24 targets.  Tremble has 87 on 16 targets.  Sanders has 92 on 14 targets. None of those are good enough, so why aren't we calling more plays with T-Mac as the first read and forcing the ball to him (and again, that's not me wanting my guy to get more targets, that's me wanting more targets for the only productive pass catcher so far this year, I'd feel the same no matter what that player's name was). All of this is why I have issues with Canales' play calling.  How do you have a player who had 73 yards in the first half and then you only give him 1 target in the 2nd half despite playing from behind the majority of that time? You can be happy about the win, happy about Dowdle getting 200 yards, but in a game where your QB threw it 30 times, I can't accept the above sentence in the same breath, that's just terrible play calling, which is on top of the already predictable play calling in general, which is also on top of boring play designs as well. Add it all up, and THAT is why I'm unhappy even after a win, not because "my guy" didn't have a bigger game.
×
×
  • Create New...