Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The money part of firing Rhule


Chiefzack
 Share

Recommended Posts

If Tepper decided to pull the plug after this season, a big consideration is Matt Rhule is due 5 years 100% guaranteed at $10 million... so 50 million

If I'm not mistaken, those buyouts usually don't equal "coach gets a check" there's terms that usually say if terminated, you can accept this lump sum amount or get payments of the remaining balance over 10-12 years, but if you accept payments you cannot accept another job.

 

I'm just wondering if Matt's contract is as iron clad as made out? Usually most coaches don't ever usually get 100% of that guaranteed amount unless they take payments, so they get a lump sum of 50-60%.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, SizzleBuzz said:

Yes, it is.

That said, Big Dave don't give a flying F***...

...paying Rhule out is akin to loose change under the car seats for him.

See ya...

I understand that we are not getting out from under the 100% guaranteed.

What I'm wondering is did Rhules agent put a clause in where he gets paid 100% of the remaining contract if he gets fired?

We might be able to get out at 50-60% if he took a lump sum if he has to take payments.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What is it that anyone has seen up to this point that indicates Rhule will finally figure it all out if he's given more time/another season?  

I'm just not seeing anything that suggests Rhule is growing into his job as a head coach.  Quite the contrary in fact, it appears to me that this team and Rhule are regressing.

  • Pie 6
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, NanuqoftheNorth said:

What is it that anyone has seen up to this point that indicates Rhule will finally figure it all out if he's given more time/another season?  

I'm just not seeing anything that suggests Rhule is growing into his job as a head coach.  Quite the contrary in fact, it appears to me that this team and Rhule are regressing.

This. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:
2 minutes ago, NanuqoftheNorth said:

I'm just not seeing anything that suggests Rhule is growing into his job as a head coach.  Quite the contrary in fact, it appears to me that this team and Rhule are regressing.

This. 

 

Who do you suggest should replace the Head Ball Coach Matt Rhule?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It is hard to win in the NFL. I’m never going to put an * next to a Dub.
    • We had a very favorable matchup our o-line manhandles theirs. Even Etienne looked like he would have had a great game on his limited rushing opportunities. 
    • I think that's part of the problem, he's spreading the ball around too much, many of them are the first read play calls, and on top of that, a large portion of them are purposefully called screens or other short passes. I just looked, the Cardinals are the only other team in the league right now without at least 3 players with 100+ yards receiving so far this year, with the majority of teams having 4 or more.  And even then, their #2 right now is McBride with over 200 yards. Our 2nd leading receiver this year has 108 yards (albeit with 4 more players with 82 or more). On the surface, that might not be as alarming as you might think, but when you add into it that Bryce is currently 6th in the league in pass attempts, and it's even more alarming that he hasn't gotten a 3rd player to 100 yards so far and his second highest is only 108. XL has 39 yards on 18 targets.  Renfrow has 82 yards on 24 targets.  Tremble has 87 on 16 targets.  Sanders has 92 on 14 targets. None of those are good enough, so why aren't we calling more plays with T-Mac as the first read and forcing the ball to him (and again, that's not me wanting my guy to get more targets, that's me wanting more targets for the only productive pass catcher so far this year, I'd feel the same no matter what that player's name was). All of this is why I have issues with Canales' play calling.  How do you have a player who had 73 yards in the first half and then you only give him 1 target in the 2nd half despite playing from behind the majority of that time? You can be happy about the win, happy about Dowdle getting 200 yards, but in a game where your QB threw it 30 times, I can't accept the above sentence in the same breath, that's just terrible play calling, which is on top of the already predictable play calling in general, which is also on top of boring play designs as well. Add it all up, and THAT is why I'm unhappy even after a win, not because "my guy" didn't have a bigger game.
×
×
  • Create New...