Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

  • panthers-redskins-1.jpg

Why not Doug Pederson?


ENCPantherfan2
 Share

Recommended Posts

He's proven, went to a SB, only was on the outs because of that slime ball Howie Roseman, actually was right about some things in the organization (ie the FO wanted to fire Frank Reich the year they won the superbowl but he fought that off), and I believe the players actually liked him. That last year was not on him. 

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I actually like the idea of Pederson as an OC if we keep Rhule but fire Brady.

He's got a track record of success, runs a West Coast type system so no need for system based personnel turnover. Plus he's got a Panther connection through VP of Player Personnel Pat Stewart.

Hell, he was even on the 95 offseason roster (didn't make the team though).

  • Pie 8
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

I actually like the idea of Pederson as an OC if we keep Rhule but fire Brady.

He's got a track record of success, runs a West Coast type system so no need for system based personnel turnover. Plus he's got a Panther connection through VP of Player Personnel Pat Stewart.

Hell, he was even on the 95 offseason roster (didn't make the team though).

This

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

You'd just have to convince Matt Rhule to hire him rather than promoting one of his own people.

Good luck with that part 😕

 

8 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

You'd just have to convince Matt Rhule to hire him rather than promoting one of his own people.

Good luck with that part 😕

I think Rhule is reasonable enough to be able to look back at what didn’t and did work. Then make those changes. Unfortunately it means firing a few names

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, TheCasillas said:

I think Rhule is reasonable enough to be able to look back at what didn’t and did work. Then make those changes. Unfortunately it means firing a few names

Go back to his history though. He turned down the Jets head coaching job because they wanted input on his staff.

Turns out they may have had valid reason.

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TheCasillas said:

I think Rhule is reasonable enough to be able to look back at what didn’t and did work. Then make those changes. Unfortunately it means firing a few names

We didn't hire him to be the college version of Ron Rivera if he has to be told any of this it's time to move on.

  • Pie 4
  • Beer 2
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Mr. Scot said:

Go back to his history though. He turned down the Jets head coaching job because they wanted input on his staff.

Turns out they may have had valid reason.

Can Tepper put the screws on him saying you no longer are allowed to promote your own buddies but are required to get proven NFL Offensive Coordinators....or else you can go back to college?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

I actually like the idea of Pederson as an OC if we keep Rhule but fire Brady.

He's got a track record of success, runs a West Coast type system so no need for system based personnel turnover. Plus he's got a Panther connection through VP of Player Personnel Pat Stewart.

Hell, he was even on the 95 offseason roster (didn't make the team though).

If I'm Pederson, why would I be a OC when I have a good shot at being a HC next year?

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, glenwo2 said:

Can Tepper put the screws on him saying you no longer are allowed to promote your own buddies but are required to get proven NFL Offensive Coordinators....or else you can go back to college?

Sure, but given Rhule's history I'm not sure he'd agreed to it and that could lead to a parting of the ways.

(which I'd be fine with)

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 2
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...