Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Tepper's Next HC: Get a Search Committee


saX man
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, SizzleBuzz said:

Got it!

The thought/belief that a guy like Tepper would abdicate his control position and leave the decision up to a "search committee"...

...is absurd.

He needs to because he’s dumb and has no idea what’s going on. He just has money that’s all, he shouldn’t never been given the team imo. That’s how bad Tepper is buddy, and u can shove the Appaloosa model u preach up your candy a$$.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, SizzleBuzz said:

Got it!

The thought/belief that a guy like Tepper would abdicate his control position and leave the decision up to a "search committee"...

...is absurd.

Gotcha. My point was that the results to date and fact that this is even a conversation at this point indicates that his approach failed and something new is needed.

With that said I agree that he wouldn't give complete control, and I'm somewhat OK with that. He would, however, hopefully accept the counsel of some proven NFL folks and let that play a key role in the overall process. Whatever he's currently doing, be it a lot or a little, sure isn't working out on the field.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, SizzleBuzz said:

Got it!

The thought/belief that a guy like Tepper would abdicate his control position and leave the decision up to a "search committee"...

...is absurd.

Not the typical procedure in the NFL.  He's not abdicating control.  He hires them for their professional intel that is compiled and presented as the pool gets smaller and smaller.  They present findings and recommendations through the process but it's still his power, his choice. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, saX man said:

Not the typical procedure in the NFL.  He's not abdicating control.  He hires them for their professional intel that is compiled and presented as the pool gets smaller and smaller.  They present findings and recommendations through the process but it's still his power, his choice. 

What you're describing is the business owner retaining a professional headhunter/firm for the sake of sourcing/vetting candidates.

Possibly I'm mistaken but the OP is suggesting a "search committee" should be given full control over the decision with no input from Tepper...

...two completely different things.

EDIT:  I see you are the original poster, my bad!  Your realtor analogy is a good one, maybe Tepper will employ a search firm if he replaces Rhule.  I misunderstood your original premise...thought you were suggesting he should be completely removed from the process.

 

 

Edited by SizzleBuzz
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, SizzleBuzz said:

What you're describing is the business owner retaining a professional headhunter/firm for the sake of sourcing/vetting candidates.

Possibly I'm mistaken but the OP is suggesting a "search committee" should be given full control over the decision with no input from Tepper...

...two completely different things.

Well that's your assumption and manner of breaking it down.  I'm suggesting getting a search firm that is comprised of ex-execs (there's a few in the NFL ranks), which is the most common term they're given.  Hope that clears it up.  The man paying them still makes the decisions, he doesn't contractually give them away.  

Search firm, advisory group, call it what you may.  The premise is I'd like Tepper to add resources to the hunt and not do it in the vacuum of thinking he knows what to ask and how to find the right guy.  Pretty clear.

 

Edited by saX man
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • That offense last year was so predictable. I really don't know what the strategy was in the end. Did Frank not trust his qb? Did he not want the qb they selected? Did he not want a rookie at all? What the actual fug was the plan? He wasn't going to work on his qb's mechanics until year 2? What the actual fug is that kind of development? I have never seen a team go so sideways as this team did last year. I mean they weren't winning much anyway because the rest of the team was ass but damn! At least do something to show you give a damn.
    • Powerful leg but the clip alluded to him missing a chip shot. They might have a new kicker but let's see how he does in preseason. 
    • My perception/opinion of the draft based on a few categories.  Solid draft in my opinion.  Addressing need with perceived roster upgrade:  A Got WR the team desperately needed, a solid pass catching RB and upgraded TE and LB positions with what could be contributors.  Value of players drafted: B- My non-expert ignorant opinion on Legette is he was a bit of a reach.  Full disclosure though, I thought Adonai Mitchell and Jackson Powers Johnson were solid first rounders and a lot of GM's and scouts disagreed.    Brooks being hurt is a question mark/flag for me.  Draft savvy:  A+ Moving up to first for the 5th year option was a smart move with little to no downside.  After that Morgan basically stole a 2nd round pick next year and still got his guy in the process.  Also seems to have kept consistency with that "dawg" mentality the FO has been pushing.
×
×
  • Create New...