Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Cam Newton is now top 25 in all time Rushing Touchdowns


WarPanthers89
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, Catsfan69 said:

Some of that's true. But what's also true is we drafted duds like KB and Funches because of catch radius because Cam couldn't consistently put the ball on the money.

This is some more bs, this is what I’m talking about, so the FO who cut Steve Smith, after a playoff year and game in which he was the only wr to show up, seeing the success the two had decide to draft kb because of this myth that cam needs wrs with big catch radius’s. 

idk if you just became a fan cause it sounds like it, the fact you believe that,when DG stated why he drafted kb and funchess, which doesn’t fit your baseless narrative.

Kb was drafted because “you can’t teach 6’5” and funchess because of his potential to play multiple positions including te, y’all came up with the weird myth they were drafted because of cams high passes, when in his career cam has always thrive with smaller wrs. 
 

  • Beer 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It’s only fitting in a thread about a great accomplishment for any player (much less a QB that has played the majority of his career with our team) that we have a “panthers fan” come into to do some mental gymnastics and say that he’s a bad passer and insinuate it’s not that big of a deal because it’s just “stealing TDs from running backs”. As soon as I saw the thread title I knew what it would evolve to, about as predictable as Matt Rhules press conferences.

  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, CPantherKing said:

 

(Runs per season/career comp%)

Roger Staubach (50/57.0), Steve Young (70/64.3), Patrick Mahomes (60/65.9), Russell Wilson (90/65.1), John Elway (50/56.9), Aaron Rodgers (60/65.2), Joe Theismann (40/56.7), Brett Favre (50/62.0)

 

Cam Newton (100/60.0)

 

So many variables that you can throw in by just presenting those numbers. Numbers are so easily skewed.

 

How many of those runs came in the red zone, where the other quarterbacks threw for a touchdown, or attempted to?

He had more runs, which could mean he threw less?

How many of those players played a longer career and their numbers overall started to drop?

How many played a shorter career?

How many of those games were played in freezing temperatures/windy when most teams wanted to run, because passing wasnt easy?

 

Im not saying he doesnt belong, I just gave you a VERY small sample of why you cant go by those stats.

 

Which is why they use many different sources that are close to the game to decide. We are too emotionally attached as fans to decide. I dont always agree with who should have gotten in before someone else, but generally I never find myself disagreeing with who does get in.

 

Cam's biggest challenge will be himself. He was so polarizing. People loved him, but many hated him, even within his own fan base. He didn't fit the qb mold of what many thought he should be and act like. Not my opinion, just that is what is out there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, PeteRozelle said:

So many variables that you can throw in by just presenting those numbers. Numbers are so easily skewed.

 

How many of those runs came in the red zone, where the other quarterbacks threw for a touchdown, or attempted to?

He had more runs, which could mean he threw less?

How many of those players played a longer career and their numbers overall started to drop?

How many played a shorter career?

How many of those games were played in freezing temperatures/windy when most teams wanted to run, because passing wasnt easy?

 

Im not saying he doesnt belong, I just gave you a VERY small sample of why you cant go by those stats.

 

Which is why they use many different sources that are close to the game to decide. We are too emotionally attached as fans to decide. I dont always agree with who should have gotten in before someone else, but generally I never find myself disagreeing with who does get in.

 

Cam's biggest challenge will be himself. He was so polarizing. People loved him, but many hated him, even within his own fan base. He didn't fit the qb mold of what many thought he should be and act like. Not my opinion, just that is what is out there.

 

missing-the-point-jerry.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, PeteRozelle said:

So many variables that you can throw in by just presenting those numbers. Numbers are so easily skewed.

 

How many of those runs came in the red zone, where the other quarterbacks threw for a touchdown, or attempted to?

He had more runs, which could mean he threw less?

How many of those players played a longer career and their numbers overall started to drop?

How many played a shorter career?

How many of those games were played in freezing temperatures/windy when most teams wanted to run, because passing wasnt easy?

 

Im not saying he doesnt belong, I just gave you a VERY small sample of why you cant go by those stats.

 

Which is why they use many different sources that are close to the game to decide. We are too emotionally attached as fans to decide. I dont always agree with who should have gotten in before someone else, but generally I never find myself disagreeing with who does get in.

 

Cam's biggest challenge will be himself. He was so polarizing. People loved him, but many hated him, even within his own fan base. He didn't fit the qb mold of what many thought he should be and act like. Not my opinion, just that is what is out there.

That has less to do with Cam and more to do with Jake Delhomme cucks who would rather their QB suck complete balls and throw 5 INTs a game versus an unabashedly black and confident QB that literally did nothing wrong but try his absolute best and ruin his prime for a coach  that road his coattails to the SB.

A SB in which he was cheated out of because the NFL wanted Peyton Manning to get his retirement trophy. All the while  he was head hunted all game and the team screwed out of multiple plays that would have changed the game. The amount of hate Cam gets is honestly sad, hilarious, and astounding. The small dick losers that jump at any chance to hate on the man for continuing on in the face of a league that has villainized him this entire time just shows you how truly fragile and weak the F-150’s around here are. 

  • Flames 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Catsfan69 said:

I just think when it comes down to Championship or no Championship you need a QB that can win with his arm and make great throws in crunch time.

Then explain Peyton Manning in Super Bowl 50.

I know the correct answer, I’m just interested in seeing how you backtrack from your clearly stated position above.

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Catsfan69 said:

He was an above average QB and great Football player. 

And there it is, the ol’ “he was a football player” trope.

Maybe you should also have described him as not a QB but an “athlete”?

I only suspected before, but now I know. Thanks for finally outing yourself.

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, tiger7_88 said:

And there it is, the ol’ “he was a football player” trope.

Maybe you should also have described him as not a QB but an “athlete”?

I only suspected before, but now I know. Thanks for finally outing yourself.

Outted myself how.

 

Use precise language please. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Catsfan69 said:

We got jobbed plain and simple.

Payton was done after his neck injury

But, according to you, HoF QBs always throw BB’s and win Champioships purely through the virtue of their passing skills.

So you are now denying your previously-stated view?

Edited by tiger7_88
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think he did a solid job.  Honestly I liked his post game interview the best.  He gave himself a C and said he left a lot out on the field.  That kind of attitude can carry him far.
    • This is lacking a fairly considerable amount of context. For one, Adams(age 22) started 12 of 16 games, had 38 rec, 446 yds and 3 TD's on 66 targets(18 less, with 2 less games started). The main thing missing here is that the top two WR's for Green Bay that year combined for about 2800 yds and 25 TD's. Now if you want to throw a more accurate dart at Adams, take a look at year two. This year the production was spread around considerably and Adams didn't stand out from that pack(pun not intended).  So, if XL struggles mightily this season, I would probably keep that comparison in your quiver to counter argue. I would suggest that I don't think that scenario is probably very accurate for most HOF caliber WR's taken in the first round over the past 15 or so years. Adams was the 89th pick overall, as well. A little different hill to climb than XL, although not massively.
    • to clarify I am not referring to Will Levis.  Not knowingly.   I just made that up and tried to use a reasonable guesstimate of what else was done.  That sounded in the ballpark.  At one time I did look it all up and there were several teams that had much more successful days downfield.   If that happened to be Levis' actual numbers than it's more of a lucky coincidence.  If memory serves, it wasn't just Will Levis that brought the claim into question, it was SEVERAL teams had better days.  and you are missing my entire point of the subjective nature of it all.  If PFF employee Doug watched Bryce's film and then used his same unique subjective vantage point to grade all 31 other starting QBs.  Then dumped into into a spread sheet, it would a subjective Doug take but at least it would be a level uniform subjectivity.   The grades are done by various people.  All watching and applying their own subjective view to a play.  Everyone isn't going to grade incompletions out the same.  Or completions.   So when you dump it all into a spread sheet and hit sort.....it's not actually a statement of fact as portrayed.  Which is why you sometimes get some head scratching stuff.  I'm not reframing anything.   I don't think.  I just wasn't going to look it all back up so I was talking vaguely off the general issue I have with PFF and treating any random claim they make as the truth. 
×
×
  • Create New...