Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

I gotta say it.


motocross_cat
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

So I pointed out that the #2 defense ranking was based on yards, but I'm hurting my argument because we're actually 2nd in the league in yards allowed? 

Okay 🤔

This is actually amazing I thought this whole time everyone was in on the joke but there are people who unironically think we have the 2nd ranked defense? lol oh man this is great!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Davidson Deac II said:

Anything other than stats is just an opinion and is probably flawed.   That being said, its clear the team (with one or two exceptions) has given up and is already thinking about the offseason.  

If an offense turns a ball over at their 10 and the opposing team scores, that defense will be ranked as performing better than a defense that allows a team to drive 30 yards but then stops them.

Stats don't tell the true story.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Mr. Scot said:

So I pointed out that the #2 defense ranking was based on yards, but I'm hurting my argument because we're actually 2nd in the league in yards allowed? 

Okay 🤔

I thought you meant yards allowed was the best measure for a defense.  I might have misread you. 

I think you were trying to say that was was people consider the best defense, which I don't' get either.  I don't know if I've seen a universally accepted best defense ranking.

In reality the best would probably be some situation and/or opponent adjusted ranking.

Here is the problem with fans, they think in a vacuum.  Good and bad are relative terms, fans though tend to create artificial benchmarks that they assign to good and bad.  

A good defense is the 85 Bears or 2000 Ravens, anything else is bad.

For most of the year we have been an above average defense relative to the rest of the league, which is somewhat impressive considering how bad our offense is.  

Our defense isn't elite by any stretch, there are probably only three teams I would consider that way, Pats, Bills, and Broncos.  The next 10-12 teams are probably pretty close and all of those fan bases probably complaining about their defenses being bad since they aren't elite but in reality, they are above average.

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, motocross_cat said:

If you are out here blaming or smacking the defense just stop and think for a second.  They are # 2 in the NFL and our offense is almost dead last.  What they have been able to do this season in reality is a fuging miracle considering our turnovers, inability to complete a forward pass and losing the best player on the team....again.

Lol this defense is god awful and a major reason this team is a complete embarrassment 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, motocross_cat said:

If you are out here blaming or smacking the defense just stop and think for a second.  They are # 2 in the NFL and our offense is almost dead last.  What they have been able to do this season in reality is a fuging miracle considering our turnovers, inability to complete a forward pass and losing the best player on the team....again.

Are you watching this game?….Brady is toying with us

bet we give up 30+ today

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

If an offense turns a ball over at their 10 and the opposing team scores, that defense will be ranked as performing better than a defense that allows a team to drive 30 yards but then stops them.

Stats don't tell the true story.

 

Over a period of 1-2 games, perhaps.  But over an entire season, these things tend to work themselves out.  

That being said, a defense shouldn't be penalized in rankings if the offense turning the ball over at the 10.  If the other team starts out with the ball on the the 10 yard line, then that defense has its back against the wall and the offense is almost assured of scoring regardless.  The rules favor the offense to such a degree nowadays, that you can take an average offense, put it against the best defense in the NFL, and 9 times out of 10, the average offense will score if it starts out inside the other team's 20.  Of course, our offense wouldn't, but then its far below average, so guess it doesn't count in my scenario.

 

And this is my opinion, but I think you are ignoring the mental aspect of it.  If the offense is consistently turning the ball over, and providing no help to the defense, and the defense knows that they probably aren't going to win regardless of how they play, it eventually begins to impact the play of the defense.  I see this year in and year out on bad teams.  Defense starts the season making plays, but the offense keeps putting them in bad situations, and eventually, the defense looks like our does today.  Or vice versa.  

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Davidson Deac II said:

Over a period of 1-2 games, perhaps.  But over an entire season, these things tend to work themselves out.  

That being said, a defense shouldn't be penalized in rankings if the offense turning the ball over at the 10.  If the other team starts out with the ball on the the 10 yard line, then that defense has its back against the wall and the offense is almost assured of scoring regardless.  The rules favor the offense to such a degree nowadays, that you can take an average offense, put it against the best defense in the NFL, and 9 times out of 10, the average offense will score if it starts out inside the other team's 20.  Of course, our offense wouldn't, but then its far below average, so guess it doesn't count in my scenario.

And this is my opinion, but I think you are ignoring the mental aspect of it.  If the offense is consistently turning the ball over, and providing no help to the defense, and the defense knows that they probably aren't going to win regardless of how they play, it eventually begins to impact the play of the defense.  I see this year in and year out on bad teams.  Defense starts the season making plays, but the offense keeps putting them in bad situations, and eventually, the defense looks like our does today.  Or vice versa.  

Turnovers are just one example.

There are a million variables in any given football game. That's why I don't like to go by stats. I prefer to judge by what I see.

If scouting were as simple as checking a stat sheet, anyone could do it.

Edited by Mr. Scot
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Give me Mitchell Evans over T Sanders in this run heavy offense any day of the week. 
    • What's up gents, the OGs remember me, the guy who single-handedly gave the Panthers the greatest uniform in history moniker. Not too long after that I got involved with Pro Football Focus (pre-Collinsworth acquisition) and ended up taking backseat here to preserve some objectivity. But from a distance I noticed a lot. After the end of the Cam era this place devolved into the most un-fun, petty, negative cesspool of whining and bitching that has ever graced the internet. The worst part of it all is that the level of discussion turned into the most ill-informed, hot-take, unnuanced crap, rife with people talking out of their posteriors as if they have any clue about what they are watching. Once you get into the professional side of the sport and actual film rooms, you start to understand there's an absurd number of moving parts to pretty much every snap and the details you are privy to are truly only half the picture. The absolute most important thing I learned from being part of professional level football analysis is that quarterbacking is literally the most intricate and difficult position in all of professional sports, and that the NFL itself is struggling to develop any workable model that allows them to understand what makes one succeed vs what makes one fail. Because of this paradox it has also made the quarterback position itself grossly overvalued from a fan and media standpoint, creating an absurd fixation on the results delivered by a single player who has to rely on the contributions of everyone around them. This also drives the dreaded inflation of QB salaries that inevitably cause even elite teams to lose key talent all to pour cash into the one player supposed to be able to single-handedly elevate the entire team (and defense and special teams and coaching and ownership by some mysterious proxy), yet without those same players even talented teams can wander the wilderness searching for the right guy to take advantage of their talent window. The discussions the last few years around Bryce has personified this insanity, as this board has devolved into some sort of electronic civil war between the hyperbolic Young supporters and the vitriolic Bryce haters. The reality, like practically everything in this world, is somewhere in the middle. He has traits that can absolutely elevate a team with creativity, play recognition, off-arm angle throws, mental toughness, etc. He's also physically limited, with mostly "good-enough" qualities for most situations that a professional quarterback is asked to do, and will never be an overpowering physical force like pre-injury Cam. But "good-enough" physicality represents a large majority of championship-winning quarterbacks, even in the modern era. There's a reason the corpse of Peyton Manning took the chip from elite physical specimen Cam, because the team surrounding him was talented enough to get him there, while we all know Cam was the driving force of that 2015 team. That's no knock on him, that's just how the game of football tends to work: the more complete team usually wins. The summary is this: if this team lives or dies solely on the performance of its quarterback, then it is absolutely a paper tiger even if he plays brilliantly week in and out. There are no superheroes in this sport, there are only conduits that proxy the collective efforts of much of the team around them. And no one alive can tell you how the position is played perfectly, it's all a confluence of circumstance and what unique collection of traits each player brings to the position, which can never be truly recreated season after season, even for the same player on the same team. If this place remains a raging hellscape of idiotic hot takes I will happily remove myself again and do something more productive for yet another decade, but maybe's there hope that we can all get back to the old adage, and keep pounding.
    • Really impressed how the bottom six have looked the past couple games
×
×
  • Create New...