Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Draft question...


WOW!!
 Share

Recommended Posts

10 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

That is true as well.. But then is the question do you want the 3rd or 4th best OT or the best Center in the draft?

People need to stop thinking in terms of ranking, teams look at grades.  I don't care if the next available OT is the 2nd or 5th one, does he have a similar grade as the center.  Once you factor positional value and need you might even take the OT if he has a slightly lower grade.

Think of grades on a 100 point scale.

If OT3 is a 90 and Center1 is a 90 I take the OT.

If OT3 is a 90 and Center1 is a 92 I might still take the OT, because of need and positional value.

If OT3 is a 84 and Center1 is a 92 Im taking the center or trying to trade down because that is a huge reach.

 

 

 

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, AU-panther said:

People need to stop thinking in terms of ranking, teams look at grades.  I don't care if the next available OT is the 2nd or 5th one, does he have a similar grade as the center.  Once you factor positional value and need you might even take the OT if he has a slightly lower grade.

Think of grades on a 100 point scale.

If OT3 is a 90 and Center1 is a 90 I take the OT.

If OT3 is a 90 and Center1 is a 92 I might still take the OT, because of need and positional value.

If OT3 is a 84 and Center1 is a 92 Im taking the center or trying to trade down because that is a huge reach.

 

 

 

 

I agree with this..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • https://x.com/4thand1show/status/1975274357174784272?s=46   saw this this morning and came to post something similar. I didn’t just love the team or the wins, I loved those dudes man. They put everything they had out there every Sunday. You didn’t see a rep where anybody on that field was low effort in that era, and if you did they were quickly sent packing. 
    • …is Brycen Tremayne with 108 yards. Not sure what that tells us but I imagine it’s some sort of gumbo consisting of the following: - Bryce can’t push the ball downfield  - contrary to what many were saying this offseason, the wr still needs a lot of work.  - we need Coker back badly.  - Brycen is pretty good! Congrats to that young man! Curious to hear other’s read on it. Was a pretty surprised to see he had more yards than anyone other than Tet and thought that was symptomatic of our issues on offense. 
    • I don’t think many fans would have guessed the Chiefs and Ravens would be where they are right now. Same goes for some surprise packages like the Colts, I’m not sure many would have put money on them being top of their division after five weeks. It’ll be interesting to see if this continues!   Not necessarily. The Chargers have lost both starting OL and their 1st and 2nd choice RBs. They fell apart against Washington. The Broncos have just beat the Eagles, so they’d be my favourite in that division, but they are still only one win ahead of the Chiefs. All the Chiefs need is a couple of results to go their way and they’ll be right in the fight for the AFC East. I think that division is going to be very close and probably not a 12 or 13 win division like predicted. Unless of course the Broncos kick on.
×
×
  • Create New...