Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

"FIRE RHULE" CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP


Ivan The Awesome
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, holderoftruth said:

If Rhule is retained and fans wanted to send a loud message to Tepper:

3/5/22- Charlotte FC MLS, nationally televised home opener… “Fire Rhule” chant echoing in the stadium as Tepper watches from his box. 
 

Hell I wish nobody would show up to the first game, and put a sign out front of stadium that’s says u can shove soccer up your fat a$$ Tepper!

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CarolinaLivin said:

 

Lmao yet we still have some fans that love him, unless this is sarcasm and went completely over my head lol

Fire Rhule

 

1 hour ago, TLGPanthersFan said:

There is always gonna be some. There are still people who think Darnold can be a long term starter if we just fix the offensive line. 

Salesman is also known as @SCP a fuggin legend and knows more Panthers football than 12 rando huddlers blended together in a dude smoothie.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The hatred towards Rhule has gotten pretty bad to the point where the insults are becoming personal. I don’t like his coaching but would never attack Rhule the person. 
 

On the topic of the chants, “No more Rhule’s” chant sounds more rhythmically pleasing to me if that were to happen. 
 

Rivera had similar issues to Rhule but the difference, to me, was that Rivera had NFL experience. He won a super bowl. So that gave hope to me as a fan. Rhule? Only successes he had were turning around college programs, which is great, but other than that his resume is meh. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, BurnNChinn said:

U can keep posting that but that just answers everything I’ve said before, no one is going to call out their coach in the nfl while their on the team. How about found a tweet like that, if not STFU because ur wrong!

Players defend bad coaches all the time.

Sometimes it's because they like them personally regardless of their coaching ability. Usually it's because they feel a sense of responsibility for their play.

Heck, Michael Bates was still defending George Seifert after the Panthers finished 1-15 in 2001.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, BurnNChinn said:

U can keep posting that but that just answers everything I’ve said before, no one is going to call out their coach in the nfl while their on the team. How about found a tweet like that, if not STFU because ur wrong!

(Most) Players are thinking about the long-term implications as well. If they call out their coach and get cut, no other team would pick them up for fear of conduct detrimental to the team. Unless, the player is a future all-pro, second chances aren’t typically given. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Manna said:

The hatred towards Rhule has gotten pretty bad to the point where the insults are becoming personal. I don’t like his coaching but would never attack Rhule the person. 
 

On the topic of the chants, “No more Rhule’s” chant sounds more rhythmically pleasing to me if that were to happen. 
 

Rivera had similar issues to Rhule but the difference, to me, was that Rivera had NFL experience. He won a super bowl. So that gave hope to me as a fan. Rhule? Only successes he had were turning around college programs, which is great, but other than that his resume is meh. 

“Rhules out for the Summer”

“No Rhule’s, Just Right”

”Rhules are made to be broken”

“Momma didn’t raise no Rhule”

  • Pie 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • We've got another viral Panthers song The dab is back Jags Week 1, Ohio State National Title, JLo got divorced...   Nature is healing, it's Super Bowl time
    • Its too late for that.  Time has run out.  You dont give him a ext if he plays "decent".  He played "decent" at the end of last year and look what happened.  
    • I’m not necessarily advocating sticking with Bryce. His highs show the ability is there, but there’s enough bad film out there to doubt that he can consistently enough play at a high enough level. But this video from Brett Kollman is a pretty good argument to give it a bit more time, whether that be rolling with Bryce just next year or picking up his 5th year option (not extending him).      The gist is that the structural (wider hashes) and rule (3 yd vs 1 yd thresholds for intelligible offensive lineman downfield penalties) differences in the college and NFL have led to wildly different play calling and scheme diets in college. There is much more shotgun and RPO calls in college and screen/quick throws. This simply doesn’t set up young QBs to be able to play under center, which is more preferred in the NFL due to RBs being able to more effectively run out of that formation.  They don’t know how to do it and have to learn. Yes, the NFL has trended more toward college style offense in the last decade or so, but it isn’t that pronounced and is more out of necessity than desire. And on top of all that, they ask the young QBs to do all this learning with coaching and other personnel churn going on around them.  Bad results lead to coaches getting fired and new ones with different ideas on scheme and footwork and different terminology and playbooks coming in. It makes it harder on those young QBs to learn.     So we may drop Bryce for a young QB starter in the draft and be in a similar situation. With a QB who is going to take years to learn how to operate in an NFL style offense and will struggle along the way.  So you have to weigh whether the struggles we see from Bryce are more due to this learning process vs solely physical limitations on his part. It’s almost undoubtedly a bit of both, but the answer to that question I think dictates your strategy at QB over the next few years. And of course, you have to consider what the alternatives available are.    I’m neither a Bryce hater or a Bryce Stan and I don’t have an answer to that question. But I do fear that if we move on from him, unless it’s for an established player, we’re just in for continued frustration on the QB front because it’s going to take a few years for a college QB to develop (Drake Maye’s don’t grow on trees). 
×
×
  • Create New...