Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Doesn't sound like QB in cards at 6


top dawg
 Share

Recommended Posts

24 minutes ago, trueblade said:

We weren't discussing the merit of the pick. We were discussing if teams will take IOL in the top 10.

The colts getting sucked into blowing a top 10 pick on a player who has quite literally never added a single win to their win total shouldn’t be a blueprint

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, jayboogieman said:

Maybe Growl is one of those that cares more about positional value on some made up chart than taking elite prospects.🤷‍♂️

You’re absolutely right i am. Like the league’s best franchises, I understand the concept of value relative to availability of talent, contribution to a team’s overall success, pay scale, the evolving nature of the game, and other largely simple realities that are apparently still too complex for a tiny brain drunk on tired cliches like “just looking to come away with a good player” and “I just wanna get the safest player available” and other dated adages that keep poorly ran teams like the Indianapolis colts locked in the cellar and unable to separate themselves from the pack in the league’s worst division 

Edited by Growl
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Growl said:

You’re absolutely right i am. Like the league’s best franchises, I understand the concept of value relative to availability of talent, contribution to a team’s overall success, pay scale, the evolving nature of the game, and other largely simple realities that are apparently still too complex for a tiny brain drunk on tired cliches like “just looking to come away with a good player” and “I just wanna get the safest player available” and other dates adages that keep poorly ran teams like the Indianapolis colts locked in the cellar and unable to separate themselves from the pack in the league’s worst division 

The thing about positional value is that it changes. If what Fitt said during the season was true about teams not wanting to trade any OL talent, then that means the thinking is changing and teams will value it more than in the past. That will lead to teams taking OL talent early and often in the draft which will change those pay scales.

Also, if a center, guard, or tackle is opening holes for the RB and protecting the QB, they are contributing to the team's success.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Love Linderbaum as a prospect, but no way I draft a center top 15. I loved Creed Humphrey who was rated really high and has now proven himself, but with the talent in last years draft I would not have drafted him first round, and no team did. It was end of the 2nd round. This years draft is the weakest in years, so yes I would take Linderbaum in the first round, but it would not be top 15. I'm looking pick 20 or later.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, jayboogieman said:

The thing about positional value is that it changes. If what Fitt said during the season was true about teams not wanting to trade any OL talent, then that means the thinking is changing and teams will value it more than in the past. That will lead to teams taking OL talent early and often in the draft which will change those pay scales.

Also, if a center, guard, or tackle is opening holes for the RB and protecting the QB, they are contributing to the team's success.

Any player can contribute to a team’s success. The point is impact and availability of talent relative to the ease of ability to acquire the positions that make the biggest impact, further quantified by cost.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I am just saying that there are realistic alternatives to the Dan is totally Fitterer in all his opinions and incapable of his own mind. Because we don’t know what really happened.     And your job is to support your boss even if you aren’t 100% in agreement.  And further you do not publicly dissent.  Publicly meaning when more than just the two of you are around.    ISO believe he is doing Tepper’s bidding on a lot of things and I believe it was very likely as a new hire, in 2024.  If I were to speculate further I would think that Canales has a big say in the offensive evaluations and Dan might not feel like he should be flatly overruling him since he is not an offensive guy. Any differences of opinion, if Canales feels strongly about an evaluation or decision Dan would be more likely to go with Dave than to overrule.    But can’t claim to know anything with any certainty.    I do think Dan showed us some solid work in this draft.    I also am WTF no QB competition. But I know we agree that it wouldn’t take much to show Bruce up and it seems like they were avoiding that.   In the big picture of the developmental arc they may have decided on, maybe that was okay for year two. It will absolutely not be okay for next year. And Canales has brought Hookernin so that is a small move in the direction we wanted them to go.     
    • Just to be clear no one in the front office at the time before or immediately following the 2023 draft including Fitterer Morgan or Reich was saying Bryce Young would need the highest paid OL in the entire league which we now have just to look halfway serviceable.
    • Come on dude, he's only 2 spots below SB champ Hurts. That's awesome!
×
×
  • Create New...