Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Doesn't sound like QB in cards at 6


top dawg
 Share

Recommended Posts

24 minutes ago, trueblade said:

We weren't discussing the merit of the pick. We were discussing if teams will take IOL in the top 10.

The colts getting sucked into blowing a top 10 pick on a player who has quite literally never added a single win to their win total shouldn’t be a blueprint

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, jayboogieman said:

Maybe Growl is one of those that cares more about positional value on some made up chart than taking elite prospects.🤷‍♂️

You’re absolutely right i am. Like the league’s best franchises, I understand the concept of value relative to availability of talent, contribution to a team’s overall success, pay scale, the evolving nature of the game, and other largely simple realities that are apparently still too complex for a tiny brain drunk on tired cliches like “just looking to come away with a good player” and “I just wanna get the safest player available” and other dated adages that keep poorly ran teams like the Indianapolis colts locked in the cellar and unable to separate themselves from the pack in the league’s worst division 

Edited by Growl
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Growl said:

You’re absolutely right i am. Like the league’s best franchises, I understand the concept of value relative to availability of talent, contribution to a team’s overall success, pay scale, the evolving nature of the game, and other largely simple realities that are apparently still too complex for a tiny brain drunk on tired cliches like “just looking to come away with a good player” and “I just wanna get the safest player available” and other dates adages that keep poorly ran teams like the Indianapolis colts locked in the cellar and unable to separate themselves from the pack in the league’s worst division 

The thing about positional value is that it changes. If what Fitt said during the season was true about teams not wanting to trade any OL talent, then that means the thinking is changing and teams will value it more than in the past. That will lead to teams taking OL talent early and often in the draft which will change those pay scales.

Also, if a center, guard, or tackle is opening holes for the RB and protecting the QB, they are contributing to the team's success.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Love Linderbaum as a prospect, but no way I draft a center top 15. I loved Creed Humphrey who was rated really high and has now proven himself, but with the talent in last years draft I would not have drafted him first round, and no team did. It was end of the 2nd round. This years draft is the weakest in years, so yes I would take Linderbaum in the first round, but it would not be top 15. I'm looking pick 20 or later.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, jayboogieman said:

The thing about positional value is that it changes. If what Fitt said during the season was true about teams not wanting to trade any OL talent, then that means the thinking is changing and teams will value it more than in the past. That will lead to teams taking OL talent early and often in the draft which will change those pay scales.

Also, if a center, guard, or tackle is opening holes for the RB and protecting the QB, they are contributing to the team's success.

Any player can contribute to a team’s success. The point is impact and availability of talent relative to the ease of ability to acquire the positions that make the biggest impact, further quantified by cost.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Not sure who said it first, but Tepper is the correct answer. Still, I'm gonna go with Kasay keeping it inbounds. If, you subscribe to the butterfly effect version of time travel consequences.... When we win SBXXXVIII everybody's lives change: Moose never breaks his leg, We win it all again in 05. Tommy Jone is unknown and Peppers stays home, Champs once more 2008. No artificial pig heart turning JR into a creepy weirdo, no lockout, no Clausen. Fox and Jake ride off into the sunset on their own terms. No 2-14, no #1 pick. But, no laptop, no Blinn, 3 years behind The Golden Calf of Bristol, we still get Cam. JR let's him grow his locs like he always wanted, Smitty sees Cam in a new light. Dreads swinging, (and Smitty with his 3 Lombardis behind him) Cam is old enough to get those calls. No Manning narrative, Cotchery TD, PI against Talib on Philly Brown, 10,000 RTP calls and Kony Ealy SB50 MVP. No Jeans Fridays, no Tepper. KB doesn't slip on his own meatsweat mid-route in SD, Cam becomes the 1st QB to win 10 straight SBs. Retiring after being elected 47th president of the US of A, Cam ushers in the Permanent Proletarian Revolution across the globe, Xi Jinping bows in awe. "ẄøŘƙƐṛ§ őF ŧĤə ŵØRłð, ŮŊÏŦƐ!!!"
    • Yeah your right the owner was copping hand shandies while all this was going down 
    • I mean not surprised the Patriots took him in and aren't trying to push him out. They've been the most morally bankrupt team in the NFL for a long while. Wouldn't be surprised if Vrabel has his own dirt on Kraft/Brady and other assholes from that organization over the last couple decades. 
×
×
  • Create New...