Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

2022 QB options


ericr0319
 Share

Recommended Posts

17 minutes ago, Pen15 said:

Draft oline, ride the season with sam “I see ghost”  darnold and fatt rhule to the top pick next, draft top QB next year.. ie Bengals 

The more you look at things then you can see this is pretty much the only option that builds for the future.  These quick fix solutions just keep prolonging the inevitable tear down rebuild

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Newbie said:

It wouldn’t surprise me if he was high on Malik Willis as well. He has the athleticism, arm strength and positive attitude that a lot of coaches like. His supporting cast were mostly 2 star recruits and he pressed at times to make a play when his teammates weren’t capable. He would have more weapons than he’s used to here. Assuming we fix the o-line. 

I could see that... After all, didn't he grade Patrick Mahomes, Josh Allen, and Lamar Jackson (all athletic but accurate QBs) ahead of Darnold? 

Willis reminds me a little of Jackson 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, methodtoll said:

I could see that... After all, didn't he grade Patrick Mahomes, Josh Allen, and Lamar Jackson (all athletic but accurate QBs) ahead of Darnold? 

Willis reminds me a little of Jackson 

Willis actually reminds me a little of RG3.  I don't think hes quite the explosive athlete that Jackson is, but then again nobody is. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, CRA said:

most new HCs.....want to handpick who there career and shot is tied to.  That is a thing.  You draft Pickett or Howell and then hire a QB who wants something entirely different from a QB? 

I mean, it's not a thing when you are hired and you inherit Aaron Rodgers or a lesser but well established QB. 

But yeah, a new hire isn't going to want to "rebuild" with Matt Rhule's new young building blocks. 

 

It’s a thing people say on forums that sounds really smart and clever but it isn’t really a thing

A new coach would also be more than welcome to pick a new QB if the current one doesn’t work

thats the way the game is now

you don’t just abide failure just because, just like you don’t prevent a coach from upgrading just because he makes you Sad Real Big Sad =[

Edited by Growl
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, section543 said:

Trade back ( at least once) if one of the QBs is available in rd 2 take a flyer- while drafting/ signing road graders and get a big back to pair with CMC. Even if we stick with Darnold, it’s harder to throw too many INTs if you run it 65% of the time.

I can’t think of a better way to drill straight through rock bottom 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would be happy with Lomu or Iheanachor at 19. Fano is intriguing but I don't think he makes it.
    • II see it this way: We have to look at long-term needs and current depth.  We have filled some key spots with players on one-year contracts.  I firmly believe that they intend to pay Bryce some big bucks next year.  That means you cannot hope that your rookies in 2027 can fill the spots vacated by the veterans you could not afford to re-sign.   We need to consider the cap and the fact that the need to start a rookie is not viewed as a positive by coaches and general managers, but they value first contracts--so it is a delicate balance. I think they have to look at the cap by position--"Can we afford a $50m QB and a $100m OL?  That is half the cap, before you pay your WRs and RBs and TEs.  They need to start getting younger on the OL as well.   I am not suggesting that we draft OT in round 1, but we could and I would get it.  RT on a 1-year deal, they may have intel about Ickey (who was not the best LT, to be honest) and 32-year old Moton is on a bad wheel.   Now if you go by Morgan's history, you can almost tell what position we are going to address with the first pick by noting the positions he has not focused on in free agency.  DT, considering the lack of performance by those not named Derrick Brown and the loss of Robinson, is screaming to be addressed with a top player.  Wharton is not an early down DT (DE if you want to get technical) and our LBs need to be clean--they were not in 2025.  Look for a DT early. I also think we will address ILB (pass covering Will) on day 2.  The other day 2 pick will be an OT, in my view. Do not rule out CB.  We are thin there too, and Jackson is in his final year.  I am not sure that we love Smith-Wade.  Some crackhead on here talked about moving him to S----stay tuned.   Hopefully, a team wanting Ty Simpson will move up and offer us a pick or two to move back. DT WILB OT OC QB  (you heard it here 337th--but this pick could come sooner than you think.      
    • Bryce had some bad games, but he had some good ones as well (and this is coming from a Bryce skeptic). I think it's a little simplistic to put all the offensive woes on Bryce, you also should be looking at O-line play, receiver play, RB and TE play, and also coaching. There's no way when I look at the offense in it's totality am I ready to say that a so-so to bad offense was all on Bryce, and, I also can't say that we don't need to upgrade any position on offense, save Tetairoa McMillan (who also wasn't perfect) and maybe the starting guards and T-mo.
×
×
  • Create New...