Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Apparently Rhule spoke to Charlotte reporters


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Sounds like we might be moving away from the WCO base (haven't looked at McAdoo's past philosophy)

Ugh 😖

Just based on some quick searching, seems like his foundation is WCO:

Can Ben McAdoo Fix the Panthers Offense? - Sports Illustrated Carolina Panthers News, Analysis and More

How Ben McAdoo’s New Offense Will Fly | PFF News & Analysis | PFF

Do Panthers, Ben McAdoo have a potential fit in Jimmy Garoppolo? (usatoday.com)

Might just be some coach speak by Rhule, its not like a coach is going to admit we want to run sideways.  Coaches have a habit of telling fans what they want to hear.  

If we do end up going to more of a power based running attack, that might actually lower Linderbaum down our draft board.  A lot of the reports I've seen on him is that he is more suited for zone.  He definitely doesn't fit the "bigger" profile.

 

 

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, AU-panther said:

Just based on some quick searching, seems like his foundation is WCO:

Can Ben McAdoo Fix the Panthers Offense? - Sports Illustrated Carolina Panthers News, Analysis and More

How Ben McAdoo’s New Offense Will Fly | PFF News & Analysis | PFF

Do Panthers, Ben McAdoo have a potential fit in Jimmy Garoppolo? (usatoday.com)

Might just be some coach speak by Rhule, its not like a coach is going to admit we want to run sideways.  Coaches have a habit of telling fans what they want to hear.  

If we do end up going to more of a power based running attack, that might actually lower Linderbaum down our draft board.  A lot of the reports I've seen on him is that he is more suited for zone.  He definitely doesn't fit the "bigger" profile.

WCO was what I figured because that's the style we've run, but bigger, "downhill" linemen don't necessarily fit that sort of approach.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

WCO was what I figured because that's the style we've run, but bigger, "downhill" linemen don't necessarily fit that sort of approach.

What’s even stranger is the stretch zone approach mainly in the gun Brady ran.

It really seems like he has no idea what to do on offense and it’s all just blah blah blah

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Ricky Spanish said:

"Building the team the right way"

Then why does Rhule still have roster control?

I think that means is make panic trades and piss poor QB choices one after the other, thats the "right way"....

 

I wish one of those years they took the "hard" way and fixed the god dam cap while stock piling picks. No more "redoing" over-rated players with contracts either, pick out the true young core and pay them with normal deals. Besides this blackhole cycle of trying to go .500 and even failing at that. Tiresome so tiresome. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Chaos said:

I hate Rhule like he murdered family members

I definitely feel a lot different about Rhule than I did about Fox and Rivera at the end. Maybe it's because we actually had success under those other guys. Maybe it's because I actually respected them as people and didn't think they were lying their asses off every time they opened their mouth. Maybe a little bit of both.

 

 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 4
  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • But that's the point, if the locker room feels that way, then you're going to upset them by still keeping Bryce around and playing him over the Top 10 pick. Again, it goes one of 3 ways... 1. Bryce plays well enough to earn an extension 2. Bryce still sucks and we draft his replacement who starts Week 1 with a new QB as his backup 3. Bryce still sucks, we draft his replacement in the 1st, but they start the season backing up a new vet QB who was brought in to be his mentor. With an OUTSIDE chance at a 4th option where Bryce plays well enough to convince the team to let him play out the 5th year option and then make a decision.  Which I can't see it happening, but there is still a non zero chance of that happening I guess. The only way we draft a QB next year and still have Bryce on the roster, is if we're taking someone in the middle rounds hoping to develop them as a long term backup to Bryce.
    • I hear you. But I am not absolving Legette just because he is from my neck of the woods or anything else.  Tge comment was more about the fans uneven application of blame.  I do agree that there is a noticeable disconnect between him and the QB and that he might do better with a more polished and capable delivery man.  Abd don’t feel that they used XL right, or at least how I expected it to look.  And that could be a function of a reticent WB that shies away from that style of attack. I mean it was either him or Canales that pretty much eliminated downfield from the playbook - even while we see guys running free at times. It Could work if they commit to it.  Whoever isn’t committing. 
    • Lot of passion there.  Look, if Bryce plays down to the level that we feel the need to draft a QB high, you don’t think the locker room might be ready for anything that helps them win?   There are s lot of angles to this that could come into play depending on what happens this year. 
×
×
  • Create New...