Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Moton restructured


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

Why?

Good lord he's about to trade Moton.  

I would prefer this current regime not monkey around with contracts anymore.  I fear they will screw it up so bad you couldn't get anyone to come in here even if Tepper paid them twice what he paid Rhule. 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Jon Snow said:

Why?

Good lord he's about to trade Moton.  

I would prefer this current regime not monkey around with contracts anymore.  I fear they will screw it up so bad you couldn't get anyone to come in here even if Tepper paid them twice what he paid Rhule. 

Not sure Rhule can do this without the sign off of our cap guy that was just promoted. Can’t remember his name. But still not sure this is a big deal considering Moton should be in our long term plans 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

Why?

Good lord he's about to trade Moton.  

I would prefer this current regime not monkey around with contracts anymore.  I fear they will screw it up so bad you couldn't get anyone to come in here even if Tepper paid them twice what he paid Rhule. 

IMO its to taper the deal off on the backend so in case we are winning his contract isnt going to kill us

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, KSpan said:

It's really something that the team not only sucks as they do and yet has so little space, but that this is sort of a Carolina tradition at this point.

Remember last year we were talking about the crazy huge cap space we were gonna have this year? 😕

  • Pie 5
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah and expect more players to be restructured to free up more cap space. It won't just be Moton. 

Trading Moton, or any veteran player on this team is fine by me. If we don't land Watson, then we won't have a competitive team until 2024 at the earliest assuming we land a good QB in the 2023 draft. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Am I not right in thinking at one time recently we had a decent amount of cap space? WTF did we do?

It's like we sent the kids to the store and they came back with a six pack of Tab, two bags of Cool Ranch Doritos and $1.38 in loose change.

Is this the crap we have to show for close to $200 million??? Of the top 3 we have effin' Sam Darnold and Robby Anderson??? I know, I know Shaq Thompson is #2 between those guys but he's more valuable than the two of them put together! 

Do I read it right that we've got $14 million in dead money tied up in Matt Paradis, Haason Reddick and Tre Boston???

 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
    • adamantium? adam? adam thielen super bowl game winning catch ?
×
×
  • Create New...