Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Rumor. Jimmy G potentially to Saints. Steelers also making a push


 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, SmokinwithWilly said:

Seeing all these teams trading for QBs should tell us everything we need to know about what other teams feel about this draft class. It feels like we've got Hurney/Little type rankings on the QBs this year.

the same thing happened last offseason.... the offseason QB carousel is a thing now

Edited by TheCasillas
  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, SmokinwithWilly said:

Seeing all these teams trading for QBs should tell us everything we need to know about what other teams feel about this draft class. It feels like we've got Hurney/Little type rankings on the QBs this year.

Its not a matter of the prospects available in the draft, its what it costs to move up to grab a QB prospect

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, SmokinwithWilly said:

Seeing all these teams trading for QBs should tell us everything we need to know about what other teams feel about this draft class. It feels like we've got Hurney/Little type rankings on the QBs this year.

Yeah I watched the Senior Bowl and it wasn't pretty. The 2022 QBs look like check down guys, and that won't cut it against good teams.

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

the same thing happened last offseason....

Saints don’t have the collateral to move up, colts don’t have a first, Washington is still rumored to draft someone, Denver took the upgrade when it was presented so I don’t think this a red flag by any means.

Edited by Panthercougar68
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TheCasillas said:

the same thing happened last offseason.... the offseason QB carousel is a thing now

 

2 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

Its not a matter of the prospects available in the draft, its what it costs to move up to grab a QB prospect

Last year it was possible that 4 QBs could go in the first 4 picks. There's no chance of that this year. 2 completely different QB crops. 3 1st round picks was the price tag to move up. This year it's going to be nowhere near that and teams are still looking for other options. The demand isn't as high for this class. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, SmokinwithWilly said:

 

Last year it was possible that 4 QBs could go in the first 4 picks. There's no chance of that this year. 2 completely different QB crops. 3 1st round picks was the price tag to move up. This year it's going to be nowhere near that and teams are still looking for other options. The demand isn't as high for this class. 

its still going to take at least a first and a second early round pick to follow. Teams dont want to give up that capital when they can land established QBs for far less. Thats just how it goes. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Coker has certainly earned it. Good for him.
    • I don't think we don't call things aggressively, for a Canales offense, anyway. We don't have a QB who makes aggressive throws nor stresses defenses downfield. He is at a career low on 20+ attempts per game and his career 10-20 QB rating is abysmal.  That will always be a limiting factor IF you are looking for a high flying, downfield offense. I am not even that concerned about it, I just want to see effective offense and we decidedly do not possess that. A large chunk of that is Bryce. I think the second biggest chunk is Canales. All the other components(XL included) are fairly minor in comparison to those two things. I am an advocate of attempting to improve at QB. I am not focused on finding "The QB." We failed at that with Bryce. So let's just get better. If that's a one year vet or a draftee or a cheap trade or some combination of any/all, we should do that. We have to get that QB better. Bryce will fail in 2026 and we need to have REALISTIC options to take over when that happens. That ain't Andy Dalton or Hendon Hooker or Jack Plummer or Mike White or....you get the picture. Be serious about hedging that Bryce bet and not just having to make do if he struggles or gets injured.  My mind is definitely made up on Canales. It's year two and he hasn't improved much, nor do I think the bones of a good HC are there. Ron Rivera got to that point after two seasons and he was open about the changes he had to make and advice he got to make that leap in year 3. If we don't see the same after next year, how is he not just Brian Daboll?
    • Not really buying it because T-mac faces stiffer competition week in and week out. 
×
×
  • Create New...