Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Willis vs Corral


davos
 Share

Recommended Posts

Is it the arm, the legs or the combo of both? Because it seems teams are a bit timid with Corral but I see his games, and he honestly seems like the best combo of ready, mechanics, and intangibles out of this crowd. However, word is scouting crews don’t even view them on the same tier. 

And let us not forget Corral was consensus #1 before Pickett didn’t slow down.

Both have a curve with playbooks but I wonder is Corral’s supposed douchiness is a factor? I dunno, maybe we can get a convo going here.

We’re staring at these two before Young, CJ, Levis, Haener and Co. Why is Corral behind small-hands and Willis? Is he not as legit as let on?

  • Pie 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Ricky Spanish said:

I'm honestly not sure. I have Corral and Strong as my two favorites with Pickett then Ridder behind.

I'd be thrilled if we took Corral honestly.

I liked Ridder at the start but if you take a 10,000 ft look, I just find him awkward as f$ck. Flick thrower, and he fakes hero ball (that statement is a thread in its own right)

Same sentiment with Strong for different reasons. I see an awesome arm and knack for modern offenses and in-game decision making is great….but he is just not elusive. Not speaking to mobility, but elusiveness. Makes me nervous as hell. He belongs in NO

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, davos said:

I liked Ridder at the start but if you take a 10,000 ft look, I just find him awkward as f$ck. Flick thrower, and he fakes hero ball (that statement is a thread in its own right)

Same sentiment with Strong for different reasons. I see an awesome arm and knack for modern offenses and in-game decision making is great….but he is just not elusive. Not speaking to mobility, but elusiveness. Makes me nervous as hell. He belongs in NO

Agree on Ridder he is JAG.  I like Howell but I won’t lie if we took Willis I would be excited to see what he could become here

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Corral is very talented, but he seemed to always be playing through injuries. He takes hits and doesn’t really have the frame to do so. Maybe he will change his style some in the NFL, but I kind of view him as injury prone before getting into the league. He has some of the better ball placement skills and is quick on his feet though. He is also a tough competitor (but that also led to him taking some hits). 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, davos said:

Is it the arm, the legs or the combo of both? Because it seems teams are a bit timid with Corral but I see his games, and he honestly seems like the best combo of ready, mechanics, and intangibles out of this crowd. However, word is scouting crews don’t even view them on the same tier. 

And let us not forget Corral was consensus #1 before Pickett didn’t slow down.

Both have a curve with playbooks but I wonder is Corral’s supposed douchiness is a factor? I dunno, maybe we can get a convo going here.

We’re staring at these two before Young, CJ, Levis, Haener and Co. Why is Corral behind small-hands and Willis? Is he not as legit as let on?

Amen 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I find it funny those who continue to hate on Bryce based on his rookie year when he had zero weapons or offensive line have a problem with those of us projecting his career from the 8-9 games where he played like a top 10 QB and made more big time throws during that period than any other QB.  The stats may bot have been there in terms of yards or TD passes but that’s coming as the roster improves. For those who think physical traits can overcome roster deficiencies we all witnessed how Mahomes looked under pressure that Bryce faced for most of his rookie year, we saw what happened with Stroud in similar circumstances.  None of us were creating posts proclaiming Bryce as the next Brady but we can’t just sit idly while thread after thread is created continuing with the  anti Bryce tropes  instead of supporting him and just letting him continue to develop.     
    • To me Bryce's ceiling is his backup, Andy Dalton, in his prime.  Sure, he may get us some winning seasons and may even get us to the playoffs on occasion, but with an early exit.  To me he doesn't have what it takes to be elite and it takes an elite QB to consistently get deep into the playoffs.  He's not Jackson, he's not Mahomes and he's not even Allen.  In an organization like Philly, he possibly could have what it takes to make a deep run, but let's face it...Philly is well oiled machine and and we are a GMC Grimlin.
    • If he was he would still be in the league.... Cam never learned to play QB without relying on his athletism and rocket arm.   
×
×
  • Create New...