Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

No more Watson threads. Use this one or one of the other 20 existing ones.

rayzor

By rayzor,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, NCTHFL0567 said:

Eh. They seem to be on the rebuilding front letting go of Wagner, no? I mean, their offensive line is still garbage. Their defense is worse than Carolinas. And arguably got rid of the two players those mostly contributed to them getting their 7 wins. I could be wrong on this though. 

The Wagner cut is confusing if they trade for Watson. Outside of that though, they can actually give up the haul of picks to Houston without completely gutting their draft capital due to the Wilson trade.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Toomers Mentor

Toomers

Posted
Posted
Just now, NCTHFL0567 said:

Don't really care about Cam Newton's draft talk 11 years later. But sure if you want to reference something from 11 years ago. Be my guest. Nolan Nawrocki isn't even a person in the media anymore. LOL. But alrighty. Sure. 

That’s just an example. Now answer how some self proclaimed insider has more contacts and credibility than Jeremiah? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
NCTHFL0567 Experienced

NCTHFL0567

Posted
Posted (edited)
2 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

The Wagner cut is confusing if they trade for Watson. Outside of that though, they can actually give up the haul of picks to Houston without completely gutting their draft capital due to the Wilson trade.

Yeah, but don't they want a player or two as well? Will Seattle part ways with Metcalf? Who on their defense is worth two shitts to trade? Some could argue isn't Carroll on a hot seat too? Plus he's 70? I mean, Seattle isn't exactly paradise compared to Carolina right now. 

Edited by NCTHFL0567
Link to comment
Share on other sites
WOW!! Grand Master

WOW!!

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, NCTHFL0567 said:

Yeah, but don't they want a player or two as well? Will Seattle part ways with Metcalf? Who on their defense is worth two shitts to trade? Some could argue isn't Carroll on a hot seat too? Plus he's 70? I mean, Seattle isn't exactly paradise compared to Carolina right now. 

Plus a way harder division...

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Smittymoose Experienced

Smittymoose

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, Toomers said:

What pick swap is going to get a team to take on 19M for a useless QB? Explain this magical scenario. 

I know you've convinced yourself you're a genius and know it all, but just wait and see. If the Watson move happens, Darnold will be gone. 

  • Pie 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, NCTHFL0567 said:

Yeah, but don't they want a player or two as well? Will Seattle part ways with Metcalf? Who on their defense is worth two shitts to trade? Some could argue isn't Carroll on a hot seat too? Plus he's 70? I mean, Seattle isn't exactly paradise compared to Carolina right now. 

They picked up three players in that Wilson trade themselves including a good Young starting TE and a starting DL. They wouldn't be nearly as gutted in capital as we would be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
NCTHFL0567 Experienced

NCTHFL0567

Posted
Posted
Just now, WOW!! said:

Plus a way harder division...

Yeah. Everything we've heard the past two days is Carolina is the perfect trade partner for Houston. Not sure what Seattle would be to them. Because Carolina is willing to part with players. I'm not sure Seattle has the players to part with. Rashad Penny? Tyler Lockett? LOL. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
WOW!! Grand Master

WOW!!

Posted
Posted
Just now, LinvilleGorge said:

They picked up three players in that Wilson trade themselves including a good Young starting TE and a starting DL. They wouldn't be nearly as gutted in capital as we would be.

They still will be year of non  competitiveness in a harder division 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Toomers Mentor

Toomers

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Smittymoose said:

I know you've convinced yourself you're a genius and know it all, but just wait and see. If the Watson move happens, Darnold will be gone. 

He may be gone but there is no scenario where the Panthers get all 19M back to use towards the cap, as you said would happen. Again explain how this would be possible? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, TheRumGone said:

He is. But it will be worth it imo. Ygm is gonna have to step up. And they’re gonna have to find gems in mid round picks.

It'll be like most of Cam's career. Elite QB surrounded by a bad team with a fanbase screaming to get the QB some help. The only difference is that instead of watching roster building capital get pissed away we just won't have any capital.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
NCTHFL0567 Experienced

NCTHFL0567

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

They picked up three players in that Wilson trade themselves including a good Young starting TE and a starting DL. They wouldn't be nearly as gutted in capital as we would be.

I meant trade wise for us. We have players they want. Seattle doesn't. And whatever we "gut" from this team is what it is to me. We won 5 games with the same roster last year with no QB. This year, if we don't trade for Watson it would be the same. 4 years in a row with 5 wins or less is an unmitigated disaster. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Smittymoose Experienced

Smittymoose

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

They picked up three players in that Wilson trade themselves including a good Young starting TE and a starting DL. They wouldn't be nearly as gutted in capital as we would be.

Seattle's roster sans Wilson and Wagner is worse than Carolina's roster by a pretty wide margin. They really do not have many pieces with independent value, and even less that fit the Texans' timeline to compete. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • LinvilleGorge
      Mini camp tweets

      By LinvilleGorge · Posted

      Dude... you're just all over the place. You're the one who said T-Mac is better right now than Chark was at his best.
    • tukafan21
      Mini camp tweets

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      When I say "average NFL WR", for me, that's comparing him to all WRs in the league during that season/span of time.  He was of course better than those #4-6 WR's that can't even get on the field, but talent/ability wise, he probably wasn't any better than a #3 WR for most NFL teams, he just happened to be on one of the teams in 2019 with even worse WR's so he put up solid stats for the season. Here's more or less how I'm looking at it. Take T-Mac right now and Chark at his best, put them on every NFL team at this very moment, and where would they fall on the depth chart come Week 1 (basically, the teams that don't put the rookies at #1 to "make them earn it in camp" don't count, it's projecting week 1 depth charts). T-Mac would be at worst the #2 WR on the majority of teams this season, (hell, he's likely our #1 at this very moment right now already), peak Chark would not.  Yes, T-Mac still has to prove himself at this level, but his current ability, even as a rookie who hasn't played a snap yet, would have him above Chark on any team's week 1 depth chart. Because again, you can't just fall back on "well Chark had a 1,000 yard season" and use that as the reason for having him above T-Mac.  As he didn't have that 1k yards because he was a beast, it was because he was the only halfway decent receiving option on a bad team that was always losing and passing the ball (the Jags had the 7th worst scoring differential that season).
    • LinvilleGorge
      BREAKING: Panthers interested in Justin Simmons

      By LinvilleGorge · Posted

      We clearly need to add a veteran stopgap at safety one way or the other.
×
×
  • Create New...