Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Tre Boston says Panthers may be adding another S


UNCrules2187
 Share

Recommended Posts

18 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Fitterer and Morgan's personnel moves this offseason really seem to be clicking.

If we don't improve this year, you'd have a tough time blaming it on the roster.

(quarterback issues outstanding, of course)

Defense was never really the problem and definitely not the reason we went 5-12. 
If we don’t get that man under center and line figured out it won’t matter how well the defense played. 
Personally I thought the defense was very overrated and not a top 5 defense and occasionally not a top 10. 
Miami and Washington games were atrocious. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, TLGPanthersFan said:

Defense was never really the problem and definitely not the reason we went 5-12. 
If we don’t get that man under center and line figured out it won’t matter how well the defense played. 
Personally I thought the defense was very overrated and not a top 5 defense and occasionally not a top 10. 
Miami and Washington games were atrocious. 

Defense wasn't as good as we made it out to be though.

We had the personnel (mostly) but Snow's schemes got figured out early. Didn't take massive adjustments to blunt his approach either. Basically just go run heavy and keep extra blockers back on passing downs and you had us.

Hoping Al Holcomb and Steve Wilks can help with that this season.

Edited by Mr. Scot
  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

If we are going after another defensive player... I have a feeling Tepper called Scott last night and said:

"Go get me a defense that will make Watson's Sunday endings not so happy..."

 

Season 3 Nbc GIF by The Office

Man this defense is going to be lights out!

Edited by Shocker
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No, you're right. It doesn't mean you can't call out his flaws and poor play. But it also doesn't mean you can't admit when he plays well and shows improvement. Not you personally, just in general I mean.
    • I will say, I do think there's a version of Bryce that could be really successful as a high-volume passer in a spread-based offense built around quick throws and timing-based intermediate throws with deeper throws schemed up around them. I actually think the power run based offense we're running is a poor fit for Bryce as it requires him to play under center far more often. It's a very traditional offensive approach whereas I think a scheme that spreads defenses out and lets Bryce distribute the ball quickly with anticipation and accuracy is the sweet spot for him. The key, of course, is to find a way to run the ball efficiently out of those formations. Our personnel right now (backs and OL) aren't good fits for that style of offense and I'm not sure it's a scheme Dave Canales favors very much either.
    • I root for him, and I hope for the best, as does essentially everyone. But that doesn’t mean you can’t call out flaws and bad plays. And that’s what a lot of people get wrong.  I hope I’m wrong and that he continues to improve a lot, I just doubt it. But I’ve been wrong before 
×
×
  • Create New...