Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

PANTHERS "could've" had Deshaun Watson with a guarantee of his 3rd and 4th years in contract


Woot
 Share

Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

That's a good thing. 

I didnt want Watson before the tiny towel stuff*for the haul*, for 230 fully guaranteed??? Are the brown aware of his 2 ACL tears?? Only one came back form three- Thomas "bad intentions" Davis. Thats insane for the browns to do that.  

Edited by Basbear
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Basbear said:

I didnt want Watson before the tiny towel stuff*for the haul*, for 230 fully guaranteed??? Are the brown aware of his 2 ACL tears?? Only one came back form three- Thomas "bad intentions" Davis. Thats insane for the browns to do that.  

They can’t maintain a team around him because of that contract. If we backed out because of that I’m glad. Well I’m glad I’m general because I didn’t want him…

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ForJimmy said:

They can’t maintain a team around him because of that contract. If we backed out because of that I’m glad. Well I’m glad I’m general because I didn’t want him…

Turns out he didn't give a poo about winning, just money.

Make perfect sense why he wanted Atlanta in the race.

Edited by thunderraiden
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ForJimmy said:

They can’t maintain a team around him because of that contract. If we backed out because of that I’m glad. Well I’m glad I’m general because I didn’t want him…

They already have a team around him.  They think they can make a move in the next couple seasons.  Plus the cap can always be massaged

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, thunderraiden said:

Turns out he didn't give a poo about winning, just money.

Make perfect sense why he wanted Atlanta in the race.

Yep, people were saying he was going to go where he would feel most comfortable with the fans since his allegations and I said all along he doesnt give a poo about what people think of him

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ForJimmy said:

They can’t maintain a team around him because of that contract. If we backed out because of that I’m glad. Well I’m glad I’m general because I didn’t want him…

If new "evidence" or more or a different judge or DA takes the case..........hes still getting the 230 million. Panthers did hire a PI, bet they have a risky assessment......one that you would put 230 million on.

insane.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

They already have a team around him.  They think they can make a move in the next couple seasons.  Plus the cap can always be massaged

Just look at the Falcons with Matt Ryan.  Myles Garrett and company are going to want their money and who is his top WR now?? OBJ gone, Landry might be gone, their first round TE gone.  The salary cap can be manipulated to a degree but money is money at the end of the day.  Keep pushing it back and taking on dead money and it really limits you.  Now they have no 1st round picks for the next 3 years to add cheap weapons/talent around him.  In a division with a loaded young loaded Bengals team, Lamar's Ravens, and a soundly run Steelers team good luck to the Browns... they will need it.  Oh yeah and he might STILL get suspended.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
    • adamantium? adam? adam thielen super bowl game winning catch ?
×
×
  • Create New...