Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Matt Rhule's head is to large.


Diehardpanth02
 Share

Recommended Posts

Sounds funny doesn't it? Matt Rhule's head is to large. And this is a physical and metaphorical statement all in one. The guy just focuses on so many things that are stupid. I can't fathom how he made it to a 70+ million dollar contract (cough tepper is too bald cough cough). I'm trying to be optimistic as always. But man, how do these guys manage to look like morons week in, and week out?

Here.

Read the bottom of this article. I posted it in another thread but felt it was worthy of it's own post.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.golfdigest.com/story/kenny-pickett-handsize-pitt-pro-day-carolina-panthers-nfl/amp

The fact that our FO really thinks hand size is an indicator of success and spend their time focusing their attention to such a thing is just asinine. This obsession with the "measurables" has gone to far. With All-pro oline being skipped over bc their arm length. And now this? At what point can we move on from RHULE because his head is to big? At this point I'll take any excuse possible.

It could only take someone with an awfully inflated confidence(head) to legitimately look at a college QB who has broken Dan Marino's passing records and question his hand size.

And to be fair, after teddy I'm against any QB that has to wear two gloves to play the position but that's just because I have trust issues. And these guys are the one who signed Poowater in the first place. Hand issues didn't seem to matter then did it?

I'm at my wits end. I sincerely apologize for the rant. But at least I feel better now that it's off my chest. And hey, we signed a couple lineman worth a poo. That way our extra large handed QB we sign or start can not be fearful for his life every down on Sundays.

Lord Help us.

Edited by Diehardpanth02
Matt Rhules belly is to round.
  • Beer 2
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, LinvilleGorge said:

If I was in their position, I would've been at the pro day as part of a smokescreen effort but I would've given myself away when I dosed off in the stands as he was throwing.

At least sleep rejuvenates the soul. These guys are wondering if double jointed fingers would be a game changer in a circle jerk.

 

  • Beer 1
  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Daddy_Uncle said:

To be fair it's a stupid post. Also it's not a typo if done more than once.

To be fair. I'm not a journalist. And this is a discussion board. I do my best on this small phone I have. If you would like I would be more than happy to send you a more grammatically correct version too you personally. If I need 2.

But thanks for the observation.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Pakmeng said:

You are talking to a community that has developed hatred for him because of handsome.

 

Either way measurables and personality are alot of what scouting is about this time of year. These seem like Halloween criticisms of Rhule when real ones are plenty.

Sure they have their place. But when you focus more on the length of a guys finger, than his ability to read defenses on film. Or his likelihood to fit into your scheme it does make one wonder how on earth a professional coach could be caught on film paying this much attention to such a minor detail.

 

If he were a pro with the major details in order it would be one thing. Maybe even something to applaud..but the product on the field says differently and maybe his approach is a cause for concern when scouting talent and putting the right players on the field.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm neither pro-Pickett or anti-Pickett here, but is it really just our FO that's obsessed with measurables?  The entire league and national media have picked up this story and ran with it.  I'm not defending Rhule or anyone else here, but an article on Golfdigest.com written with extremely sarcastic undertones isn't going to make me feel bad about Rhule.  Like someone else previously said, there are plenty of others reason to dislike Rhule.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You think Rhule is the only coach/scout/GM that looked into Pickett’s hand size? After such a big deal was made about it prior to and at the combine?

 

I get critiquing Rhule over passing on a guy like Slater (I still like the Horn pick), but creating issues over nothing just to complain gets old. Everyone has been talking hand size with Pickett.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I dont necessarily disagree just really curious as to why that is?  He either must be a dunce, a bad teammate or must be horrendous in practice because I thought he showed promise at least in his 2nd year
    • Its AI but here goes nothing:   Trevor Lawrence's catchable ball statistics vary by situation, with his highest rate being 74.1%74.1 % 74.1% in a clean pocket and his lowest on deep balls at 41.2%41.2 % 41.2% . When pressured, his catchable pass rate is 51.6%51.6 % 51.6% , and it's 55.2%55.2 % 55.2% on play-action plays. Lawrence has also been impacted by a high receiver drop rate, which makes it appear as if he is more inaccurate than he is.  Catchable pass rate by situation  Clean pocket: 74.1%74.1 % 74.1% (ranks 28th out of 32 quarterbacks) Deep balls: 41.2%41.2 % 41.2% (ranks 23rd out of 32 quarterbacks) When pressured: 51.6%51.6 % 51.6% (ranks 15th out of 32 quarterbacks) On play action: 55.2%55.2 % 55.2% (ranks 28th out of 32 quarterbacks) Red zone: 65.1%65.1 % 65.1% (ranks 15th out of 32 quarterbacks) When blitzed: 69.2%69.2 % 69.2% (ranks 19th out of 32 quarterbacks)    Compared to:   Bryce Young's catchable ball stats vary by situation, with a high catchable pass rate of 73.2%73.2 % 73.2% in a clean pocket (30th in the NFL) and a 60%60 % 60% rate on deep throws (20+ air yards), which was 10th in the NFL in 2024. However, his pressured and blitzed catchable rates were lower at 39.7%39.7 % 39.7% (31st) and 60.3%60.3 % 60.3% (29th), respectively.  By situation  Clean pocket: 73.2%73.2 % 73.2% catchable pass rate (30th in NFL) Deep ball (20+ air yards): 60%60 % 60% catchable pass rate (10th in NFL in 2024) Pressure: 39.7%39.7 % 39.7% catchable pass rate (31st in NFL) Blitzed: 60.3%60.3 % 60.3% catchable pass rate (29th in NFL) Red zone: 62.5%62.5 % 62.5% catchable pass rate (22nd in NFL) 
    • Same slant as before, dude. Look, it doesn't matter what mental gymnastics you apply to the story. You cannot remove Bryce from being a part of why we won these games. He did his job. In some games better than others? Yes, but the end result still matters. The wins are team wins. The losses are team losses  And Bryce plays a key role in the team. Like I said earlier, continue arguing that he should be replaced. I'm doing that as well.  But denying reality doesn't help your argument. It actually weakens it. 
×
×
  • Create New...