Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Chris Simm's Top 5 Quarterbacks


Bunskie
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just listened to this and I really enjoy listening to Simms talk about the QBs every draft. His knowledge of throwing mechanics and his insights on that separate him from the rest of the talking heads in my opinion. This was a great listen and opened my eyes some on a few of these prospects. 

  • Pie 4
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I put a lot of stock into what Simm's says and I really like how he breaks it down. I bought a lot into the negative hype around this year's QB class, but I would be thrilled with Corral or Pickett now. It would be nice to be competitive again. I think we are a QB away. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, NCTHFL0567 said:

He played in a meaningless bowl game and coincidentally got hurt. Intelligent? Hmmmmm. 

Your post speaks to a profound lack of understanding regards the situation.

He wanted to play for those that supported him. It was all about his team. He wasn't going to willingly let them down. That has absolutely nothing to do with intelligence. Maybe it wasn't the smart move...if you believe a player should only think of himself, but, again, it has nothing to do with intelligence.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, CPantherKing said:

Best QBs in this draft are not on that list. Combine is a joke. Watch film. See how they perform in clutch situations. Make sure they are consistent winners.

If those are your standards then you have to scratch Pickett, Willis, and Howell off that list.

Going off winning in college is a silly thing, because you wouldn't have drafted Mahomes, there's others too that have been drafted high with a loosing record. If your team's defense sucks and it costs the team games, not a lot the QB can do about that. Othwerwise Howell would be looked at different. Multiple GWD, stats in the second half+OT are much better. :Completion % is higher, QBR is higher, td to int ration is higher.. ext

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, top dawg said:

Your post speaks to a profound lack of understanding regards the situation.

He wanted to play for those that supported him. It was all about his team. He wasn't going to willingly let them down. That has absolutely nothing to do with intelligence. Maybe it wasn't the smart move...if you believe a player should only think of himself, but, again, it has nothing to do with intelligence.

Ha. I'm a bigger CFB fan so I want these guys to play in this bowl games. 

But alas, all we've been told is how meaningless these bowl games are. Regardless, him playing is not an intelligent move for himself at all. Nor do NFL teams care about him being for his "team." In fact, his draft stock has slid since that bowl game as at one point he was rated higher than Willis and Pickett. But sure man. Sure. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, NCTHFL0567 said:

Ha. I'm a bigger CFB fan so I want these guys to play in this bowl games. 

But alas, all we've been told is how meaningless these bowl games are. Regardless, him playing is not an intelligent move for himself at all. Nor do NFL teams care about him being for his "team." In fact, his draft stock has slid since that bowl game as at one point he was rated higher than Willis and Pickett. But sure man. Sure. 

I wouldn't quit on my team, risk or not.  Not how I was raised.

I'm not saying its smart, but it's what I would do as well.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, thefuzz said:

I wouldn't quit on my team, risk or not.  Not how I was raised.

I'm not saying its smart, but it's what I would do as well.

Yeah, it's the way of College players nowadays. See the majority of Ohio State's receivers quitting before the Rose Bowl. It was wild. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Simms definitely has me wanting to look closer on Corall.  I mean his comp would be top of the group as well.  His injuries had me overlooking him a bit but the guy has the arm.  Of course, we don't get to interview him either to see where his head is

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Shocker said:

Simms definitely has me wanting to look closer on Corall.  I mean his comp would be top of the group as well.  His injuries had me overlooking him a bit but the guy has the arm.  Of course, we don't get to interview him either to see where his head is

I was saying the same thing... And I might be wrong.. His release is quick as hell..

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would Morgan or Beason have been HOFers' if injuries hadn't derailed their careers?  I was not a close watcher of the game when Morgan was in his prime but I thought Beason had a few seasons at close to Lukes' level of play.
    • Franchise QBs feast when things are rolling and the tide that raises boats when things are going sideways.  Bryce isn't that. He's a complimentary player, that's it.  When the defense and STs are on point, he plays loose and it shows.  When we are in a dog fight and things haven't gone our way, he struggles.  It's that simple. He's not a horrible QB, but he's not top tier either.  So the question begs, is this worthy of a second contract?  The answer should be no.  It definitely is my answer. Bryce will never be a QB that can produce wins largely on his arm.  That's a FRANCHISE QB, any other QB is simply a placeholder at the starter's position until that guy can be found.   At some point the excuses of lack of weapons will be a straw man.  Heck, it's nearly there now.  I mean if he doesn't look even better than last year will we blame it on the TE position?  'Well if Bryce only had a player like Kelce, Kittle or Gronk on this team...'  Are we really going to do that?  
    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
×
×
  • Create New...