Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Chris Simm's Top 5 Quarterbacks

Bunskie

By Bunskie,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

Panthering Mentor

Panthering

Posted
Posted

Just listened to this and I really enjoy listening to Simms talk about the QBs every draft. His knowledge of throwing mechanics and his insights on that separate him from the rest of the talking heads in my opinion. This was a great listen and opened my eyes some on a few of these prospects. 

  • Pie 4
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Cornflake Enthusiast

Cornflake

Posted
Posted

I put a lot of stock into what Simm's says and I really like how he breaks it down. I bought a lot into the negative hype around this year's QB class, but I would be thrilled with Corral or Pickett now. It would be nice to be competitive again. I think we are a QB away. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
top dawg Grand Master

top dawg

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, NCTHFL0567 said:

He played in a meaningless bowl game and coincidentally got hurt. Intelligent? Hmmmmm. 

Your post speaks to a profound lack of understanding regards the situation.

He wanted to play for those that supported him. It was all about his team. He wasn't going to willingly let them down. That has absolutely nothing to do with intelligence. Maybe it wasn't the smart move...if you believe a player should only think of himself, but, again, it has nothing to do with intelligence.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
carpanfan96 Grand Master

carpanfan96

Posted
Posted
11 hours ago, CPantherKing said:

Best QBs in this draft are not on that list. Combine is a joke. Watch film. See how they perform in clutch situations. Make sure they are consistent winners.

If those are your standards then you have to scratch Pickett, Willis, and Howell off that list.

Going off winning in college is a silly thing, because you wouldn't have drafted Mahomes, there's others too that have been drafted high with a loosing record. If your team's defense sucks and it costs the team games, not a lot the QB can do about that. Othwerwise Howell would be looked at different. Multiple GWD, stats in the second half+OT are much better. :Completion % is higher, QBR is higher, td to int ration is higher.. ext

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
NCTHFL0567 Experienced

NCTHFL0567

Posted
Posted
22 minutes ago, top dawg said:

Your post speaks to a profound lack of understanding regards the situation.

He wanted to play for those that supported him. It was all about his team. He wasn't going to willingly let them down. That has absolutely nothing to do with intelligence. Maybe it wasn't the smart move...if you believe a player should only think of himself, but, again, it has nothing to do with intelligence.

Ha. I'm a bigger CFB fan so I want these guys to play in this bowl games. 

But alas, all we've been told is how meaningless these bowl games are. Regardless, him playing is not an intelligent move for himself at all. Nor do NFL teams care about him being for his "team." In fact, his draft stock has slid since that bowl game as at one point he was rated higher than Willis and Pickett. But sure man. Sure. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
thefuzz Mentor

thefuzz

Posted
Posted
8 minutes ago, NCTHFL0567 said:

Ha. I'm a bigger CFB fan so I want these guys to play in this bowl games. 

But alas, all we've been told is how meaningless these bowl games are. Regardless, him playing is not an intelligent move for himself at all. Nor do NFL teams care about him being for his "team." In fact, his draft stock has slid since that bowl game as at one point he was rated higher than Willis and Pickett. But sure man. Sure. 

I wouldn't quit on my team, risk or not.  Not how I was raised.

I'm not saying its smart, but it's what I would do as well.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
NCTHFL0567 Experienced

NCTHFL0567

Posted
Posted
17 minutes ago, thefuzz said:

I wouldn't quit on my team, risk or not.  Not how I was raised.

I'm not saying its smart, but it's what I would do as well.

Yeah, it's the way of College players nowadays. See the majority of Ohio State's receivers quitting before the Rose Bowl. It was wild. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Shocker Grand Master

Shocker

Posted
Posted

Simms definitely has me wanting to look closer on Corall.  I mean his comp would be top of the group as well.  His injuries had me overlooking him a bit but the guy has the arm.  Of course, we don't get to interview him either to see where his head is

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
WOW!! Grand Master

WOW!!

Posted
Posted
6 hours ago, Shocker said:

Simms definitely has me wanting to look closer on Corall.  I mean his comp would be top of the group as well.  His injuries had me overlooking him a bit but the guy has the arm.  Of course, we don't get to interview him either to see where his head is

I was saying the same thing... And I might be wrong.. His release is quick as hell..

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • tukafan21
      Mini camp tweets

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      How am I all over the place?  I'm still saying that. I'm saying that Chark at his best and T-Mac right now, on the same team right now for the 2025 season, T-Mac would be ahead of him on the depth chart Week 1. Because in the same way everyone is saying, "T-Mac hasn't played a snap in the NFL yet", the very same is true to say, "nothing Chark did in his past matters moving forward" His peak was a 1,008 yard season where he was the only decent WR on a terrible team.  He didn't put up the 1k yard season because he was a great WR, it was because of how bad the rest of them on the team were. His stats aren't the same as his ability, and his ability was never all that good to begin with. Hell, most of this board agrees that T-Mac is our #1 right now, even if Thielen is Bryce's #1 option early in the saeson just because of the comfort level there, he's still just a slot safety valve and T-Mac is our #1. If you put peak Chark on the roster RIGHT NOW (even without T-Mac)... is anyone even putting him over Thielen, XL, or Coker going into this season? I'm honestly not sure many of us would consider him as such, because even at his best, he was just a JAG.  So if the same people who are okay with T-Mac being ahead of those guys right now, wouldn't put Chark above them, how can you in the same breath say Chark was better than T-Mac already is now?
    • LinvilleGorge
      Mini camp tweets

      By LinvilleGorge · Posted

      Dude... you're just all over the place. You're the one who said T-Mac is better right now than Chark was at his best.
    • tukafan21
      Mini camp tweets

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      When I say "average NFL WR", for me, that's comparing him to all WRs in the league during that season/span of time.  He was of course better than those #4-6 WR's that can't even get on the field, but talent/ability wise, he probably wasn't any better than a #3 WR for most NFL teams, he just happened to be on one of the teams in 2019 with even worse WR's so he put up solid stats for the season. Here's more or less how I'm looking at it. Take T-Mac right now and Chark at his best, put them on every NFL team at this very moment, and where would they fall on the depth chart come Week 1 (basically, the teams that don't put the rookies at #1 to "make them earn it in camp" don't count, it's projecting week 1 depth charts). T-Mac would be at worst the #2 WR on the majority of teams this season, (hell, he's likely our #1 at this very moment right now already), peak Chark would not.  Yes, T-Mac still has to prove himself at this level, but his current ability, even as a rookie who hasn't played a snap yet, would have him above Chark on any team's week 1 depth chart. Because again, you can't just fall back on "well Chark had a 1,000 yard season" and use that as the reason for having him above T-Mac.  As he didn't have that 1k yards because he was a beast, it was because he was the only halfway decent receiving option on a bad team that was always losing and passing the ball (the Jags had the 7th worst scoring differential that season).
×
×
  • Create New...