Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Will drafting a rookie QB save Rhule?


firefox1234
 Share

Recommended Posts

Will drafting a QB whether it be Pickett, Willis, or maybe Corrall really save Rhule? We went 6-10 in Cam’s rookie year and no one in this draft is even close to Cam in talent.

We are probably not Jaguars bad who went 3-14 with Lawrence, but I am having a hard time seeing us do significantly better than 5-12 with one of these rookie QBs.

Unless one of them is hidden diamond and shows it out of the gates, I can’t see Rhule getting the necessary record to justify giving him a fourth year.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, BurnNChinn said:

We all knew this was a possibility, Tepper should have known that as well. I think it definitely gives him a pass which is why Tepper should have fired him and let the new coach pick his qb. But nothing Tepper has done for this team so far has made since. JS

But why should it give Rhule a pass?

If year 3 is gonna be similar to year 1 and 2 then that is pretty depressing. RR at least had the luck and hindsight to get his QB early and build from their. Rhule has fumbled the most important position twice in a row and now Tepper is supposed to convince us those were just mulligans now that Rhule has a rookie QB?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rhule's year 3 in college were good years--let's see how he is in the pros. 

Man I wish I had a simple answer to this question.  Remember the bad weather game that the Patriots won against Buffalo and they threw the ball only 3 times?  That was Bill B. protecting Mac Jones from his weakness--no arm strength in the wind. That is a great example of a coach understanding the limitations of his QB.  I think that game sent a message to coaches with young QBs.

The OL we are drafting?  All good in the run game. RB Foreman?  A pounder between the tackles.  I see a strong run game, play action passes, slants, and a lot of screen passes in the young QB's future.  So I think there is a way to bring a young QB along while he is starting.  Our defense needs to step up--that is huge, but if we can stay in every game, we can win them.  Not ideal, I know. 

Edited by MHS831
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

Rhule's year 3 in college were good years--let's see how he is in the pros. 

Man I wish I had a simple answer to this question.  Remember the bad weather game that the Patriots won against Buffalo and they threw the ball only 3 times?  That was Bill B. protecting Mac Jones from his weakness--no arm strength in the wind. That is a great example of a coach understanding the limitations of his QB.  I think that game sent a message to coaches with young QBs.

The OL we are drafting?  All good in the run game. RB Foreman?  A pounder between the tackles.  I see a strong run game, play action passes, slants, and a lot of screen passes in the young QB's future.  So I think there is a way to bring a young QB along while he is starting.  Our defense needs to step up--that is huge, but if we can stay in every game, we can win them.  Not ideal, I know. 

We will definitely need to rely on our defense. But has our D gotten better than last year? I love our off season moves so far especially on the OL. However, I don’t know if this defense can carry the day like last season and I can’t confidently say our offense won’t need carrying, especially if we draft a rookie QB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it is a long shot at best.  One possible scenario would be we still have a sub .500 record but the kid plays with his hair on fire, wins OROY and creates a lot of excitement.    Might keep Rhule because all things look positive, previous issues more or less corrected, you definitely have momentum and can see the window opening. 

But this is a long-shot in my opinion. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Pejorative Miscreant said:

I think it is a long shot at best.  One possible scenario would be we still have a sub .500 record but the kid plays with his hair on fire, wins OROY and creates a lot of excitement.    Might keep Rhule because all things look positive, previous issues more or less corrected, you definitely have momentum and can see the window opening. 

But this is a long-shot in my opinion. 

For a rookie QB in our team to win OROY he will probably have to put rookie Cam like numbers and I doubt many would complain if we allowed Rhule another season to build around that prospect even if we finished sub 500. At least for another year….

But just as you said, it is highly unlikely.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, firefox1234 said:

There probably isn’t a better place for a rookie QB to land than NE. I wish I could say the same about here…

I agree. He went to the perfect place for his style of ball. It'd why Jimmy G looked good there and was successful. I dunno.. I think if the line holds up and you have cmc.. you could have success in carolina.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, firefox1234 said:

But why should it give Rhule a pass?

If year 3 is gonna be similar to year 1 and 2 then that is pretty depressing. RR at least had the luck and hindsight to get his QB early and build from their. Rhule has fumbled the most important position twice in a row and now Tepper is supposed to convince us those were just mulligans now that Rhule has a rookie QB?

Idk I have to ask Tepper, he don’t talk. Nothing he had done has made since imo 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, firefox1234 said:

Will drafting a QB whether it be Pickett, Willis, or maybe Corrall really save Rhule? We went 6-10 in Cam’s rookie year and no one in this draft is even close to Cam in talent.

We are probably not Jaguars bad who went 3-14 with Lawrence, but I am having a hard time seeing us do significantly better than 5-12 with one of these rookie QBs.

Unless one of them is hidden diamond and shows it out of the gates, I can’t see Rhule getting the necessary record to justify giving him a fourth year.

This team is overall way better than 2011. While you can’t win a SB without a great qb, you can definitely win 8-9 games

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yea when teams see a gun charge they rightly pause but this seems like a big misunderstanding. 
    • Sorry man you lost me at "Teppers have evolved as owners". Limped into playoffs at 8-9 not even above .500 Tepper is trash as an owner bro and that's not even a discussion at this point. 37-83 w/l ratio. Nuff said.... Morgan tho, he's cooking and it ain't cuz of Teppers leadership
    • After listening to Morgan's presser twice, I came away with some key beliefs. First of all, I don't think he's a bullshitter. What you see is what you get. When he says something, he means it.  The Teppers really have evolved as owners. Morgan has mentioned how they're easy to work with--a pleasure to work with a few times now. There seems to be a good relationship between all of them (and include Dave Canales on that). We'll see if it lasts. Yes, no one wanted to come to Carolina with the previous management, but that seems to have changed. The team signed arguably the top Edge, LB and OT on the market, two of them on pretty good deals and one on what I'll say is "not a bad one." And, credit Sunshine Dave "Flowers and Cotton Candy" Canales for helping to change the culture. Morgan mentioned getting guys--and I'm paraphrasing--that are not only great football players but great people. Don't look for us to be acquiring any James Pearce types anytime soon, just saying. We'll see if that holds true in the future. Dan Morgan really has set up the Panthers to take the BPA/BAP. He mentioned it at least a couple of times, and he doesn't seem pressured to pinpoint a particular position. He just wants quality players that will help the team. This is how it's going to be (to your joy or dismay, probably for as long as he's here), and personally I love it. Many of us know how Morgan was when he played: aggressive! That's what he's going to be when making acquisitions. He explicitly said it, and emphasized it. All avenues are open (think FA, waivers...the draft)! Personally, as long as it's controlled aggression and not reckless aggression, I love it.  On KP: "Mobility is big in this league."  He basically says if another QB is the BPA while drafting--we're going by our board, people--we're going to add them.        ...  
×
×
  • Create New...