Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Fitterer best draft day trader per PFF


top dawg
 Share

Recommended Posts

If they are going to trade back in the first, I don't want them going below about picks 13-15.  On the chart, #13 is the magic number where the first and second round pick (roughly 45) equal #6.  Unfortunately, I only see three teams with picks near those combinations: Minnesota (#12 and 46), Baltimore (#14 and 45), and Washington (#11 and 47).

Falling below those first round picks drops us too far, IMO, to have any certainty from our first round pick in a position of need.  And, if there is a run on the top LT prospects in the first 5 picks, do not move, do not pass go, do not collect $200, go directly to the podium.

 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, MHS831 said:

I am not sure this is the thread, but since trade down was mentioned, I am entitled.  I am going to unfold several layers here---so stay with me:

Based on circumstantial (perhaps meaningless) information garnered by watching the Fitterer Presserer, Fitterer mentioned that the Panthers tried to take Corral out to eat in Mississippi.  He did not mention Pickett, and we know the Steelers took Willis out to dinner; he did not mention Willis either.  We also know that Chris Simms rated Corral as his #1 QB, so it is possible that some experts like him.  Since Corral was injured in his bowl game and did not participate in the combine, he is way under the radar.  If the fact that the Panthers inquired about going out to dinner with Corral, is that to suggest that someone who picks before #6 also asked him? Ok, then does it suggest that our interest in Corral goes deeper than a "passing fancy" (that pun was awesome).  I think the desire to take him to dinner suggests a serious look, and then I bring in the fact that the Panthers feel that there is (at least one) guy in the draft at QB that "checks all the boxes."

Is that guy Corral?  If so, does that mean they think they can trade back five spots or so and add a second rounder--and still grab their QB?  Is that what Fitterer, the draft day trade guru, is hoping to do? 

Hmmm.  If Willis goes off the board by the time the Panthers pick, that would leave 2 QBs Pickett and Corral there at #6 (it is possible all three are there, making the trade back more lucrative), could we trade back and still get our QB?  

Discuss.

 

Well this does make sense.  Corral will be passed over by a couple of teams because of his injury.  We struck gold once when teams passed over a player for an injury (or perceived) in STAR.  

I really think if we are going to come away with anything, outside a 1st round pick, in this draft.  I think we need to trade back.

Many on here want a LT and a QB.  If we are going to address this in the draft than we have to trade back.  We can't have both without it.   That said Fitterer has addressed the line quite well this offseason and I think we are going to see a much better unit by the time the season start.   BC did well in his last couple of games and the front office might be thinking. 

Let's trade down get our QB in mid first and our LT with the 2nd round we pick up in a trade.   However if these LT are gone we are confident that Brady will be able to handle the LT spot. 

Fitterer also mentioned in his press conference that we did so well in the FA market that we have positioned ourselves for BPA.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, DaveThePanther2008 said:

Well this does make sense.  Corral will be passed over by a couple of teams because of his injury.  We struck gold once when teams passed over a player for an injury (or perceived) in STAR.  

I really think if we are going to come away with anything, outside a 1st round pick, in this draft.  I think we need to trade back.

Many on here want a LT and a QB.  If we are going to address this in the draft than we have to trade back.  We can't have both without it.   That said Fitterer has addressed the line quite well this offseason and I think we are going to see a much better unit by the time the season start.   BC did well in his last couple of games and the front office might be thinking. 

Let's trade down get our QB in mid first and our LT with the 2nd round we pick up in a trade.   However if these LT are gone we are confident that Brady will be able to handle the LT spot. 

Fitterer also mentioned in his press conference that we did so well in the FA market that we have positioned ourselves for BPA.  

No.....just....no.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, DaveThePanther2008 said:

What a great rebuttal. 

Don't overthink it. Don't try to fix it all in one fell swoop. The QB fix is over for 2022. It didn't happen. Wilson, Watson, etc. Also whiffed on QB's of the same caliber as the best of this draft(Trubisky, Taylor, Brissett, etc). 

Don't trade down, take the best OT on the board or best DE on the board. 

Trading down is just begging to fug this up....again. Just like 2021, consistently fuging up our draft.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Shotgun said:

Good One GIFs | Tenor

 

1 hour ago, Shotgun said:

We should merge this thread with this other one. haha

Panthers have the Worst odds to make the Playoffs in the NFC

It's weird you get poo for this. Fitterer has as much to prove as Rhule. If he wasn't vehemently opposed to the Darnold trade and picking up his 19 million dollar option there is no need for empty praise. Show me something in this draft and then we can talk. Until then we have 1 pick in the top 100 and he is responsible for that.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Don't overthink it. Don't try to fix it all in one fell swoop. The QB fix is over for 2022. It didn't happen. Wilson, Watson, etc. Also whiffed on QB's of the same caliber as the best of this draft(Trubisky, Taylor, Brissett, etc). 

Don't trade down, take the best OT on the board or best DE on the board. 

Trading down is just begging to fug this up....again. Just like 2021, consistently fuging up our draft.

First of all, I don't think we screwed up last season draft.  We may not have drafted who you wanted or who we let slip by but we got quite a lot of talent last season. Had Rhule not been so bullheaded we might have seen more of them.  Outside of Smith and our LSer most of these players played.  I think we'll see some growth out of them this season.  

I'm a proponent of trading back.   I see the opportunity to get a QB and more O-line help.  

If Hutchinson or the NCSU LT (sorry to lazy to look his name up and the spelling) were available at 6, I would take them.  Otherwise, I would consider trading back especially if we get a good package for #6 and don't trade too far down.  15 would probably be my limit. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, frankw said:

 

It's weird you get poo for this. Fitterer has as much to prove as Rhule. If he wasn't vehemently opposed to the Darnold trade and picking up his 19 million dollar option there is no need for empty praise. Show me something in this draft and then we can talk. Until then we have 1 pick in the top 100 and he is responsible for that.

The people that think Fitterer is a genius need to examine our moves. It isn't all peaches and cream. He may actually be part of the problem and not the solution. I hope not. We all hope not. Because the answers are limited if he is also an idiot like Rhule is.

At that point, the hopes for the Panthers are just basically tied to how long Tepper is alive or wants to keep the franchise.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, DaveThePanther2008 said:

First of all, I don't think we screwed up last season draft.  We may not have drafted who you wanted or who we let slip by but we got quite a lot of talent last season. Had Rhule not been so bullheaded we might have seen more of them.  Outside of Smith and our LSer most of these players played.  I think we'll see some growth out of them this season.  

I'm a proponent of trading back.   I see the opportunity to get a QB and more O-line help.  

If Hutchinson or the NCSU LT (sorry to lazy to look his name up and the spelling) were available at 6, I would take them.  Otherwise, I would consider trading back especially if we get a good package for #6 and don't trade too far down.  15 would probably be my limit. 

Yeah, I mean it is cute that most of these players played but very few made significant impacts. 

We passed up on impact, day one starters for projects or luxury picks. That was our 2021 draft. 

If you see an opportunity to get a QB in this draft, I mean....God bless is all I have to say. I suppose there are improvements over Darnold and Walker but if that is the bar, we could have accomplished that in the first day of free agency. 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, kungfoodude said:

Yeah, I mean it is cute that most of these players played but very few made significant impacts. 

Agreed no significant impact but most showed promise and another year of development and we're better off.  

I'm not against taking a LT at 6 but are you ready to ride with Darnold again?  Because at the current rate we are heading into exactly that.   Which may or may not be a bad thing.  I would like to see any of our QBs play behind this new line.  On paper it is a huge upgrade. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have faith in The Fiddler and Dan Morgan.  I do not have faith in Matt Rhule.  They know football and the NFL, Rhule does not.  This offseason has been overwhelmingly positive and has a different vibe from the previous two years; hopefully Rhule was stripped of some personnel decisions 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DaveThePanther2008 said:

Agreed no significant impact but most showed promise and another year of development and we're better off.  

I'm not against taking a LT at 6 but are you ready to ride with Darnold again?  Because at the current rate we are heading into exactly that.   Which may or may not be a bad thing.  I would like to see any of our QBs play behind this new line.  On paper it is a huge upgrade. 

I wasn't ready to ride with him last season but at this point I would rather we take our medicine, get rid of this shitty coach and not hamstring the future of our franchise based on this dumbasses decisions. 

Worst case scenario, we end up with another top 10 pick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Saints trade WR Shaheed to Seahawks Seahawks get: WR Rashid Shaheed Saints get: 2026 fourth-round pick, 2026 fifth-round pick Seahawks' grade: A- Saints' grade: B+ One of the NFL's hottest passing teams just got better. The Seahawks currently rank third in EPA per dropback (0.25) and first in success rate on dropbacks (53%). And now they are adding Shaheed in a move that makes sense both on the field and in terms of where the Seahawks are as a franchise. Shaheed, 27, is averaging 1.8 yards per route run this season. But I think that sells him short because that number is down a bit from his career average entering this year (2.0) and he's been playing a role that includes running fewer vertical routes (34%) compared to last year (44%). Shaheed also has consistently posted above-average open scores in ESPN's receiver score metrics, including a 63 this season that ranks 28th among wide receivers. As a complement to Jaxon Smith-Njigba, I expect Shaheed will run downfield more often and be a bigger threat in that role than rookie Tory Horton was. When Cooper Kupp returns, he and Shaheed will make for a nice pair of secondary threats behind one of the best receivers in the league in Smith-Njigba. This is the time to strike for the Seahawks. FPI gives Seattle an 84% chance to make the playoffs and a 5% shot at winning the Super Bowl. This addition helps boost their chances without mortgaging their future the way the Colts did in the Sauce Gardner trade. Shaheed is a pending free agent but given the leverage of the moment for the Seahawks and their need I think they ought to be plenty willing to pay the cost. Shaheed is young enough to where if Seattle doesn't retain him he should sign a free agent contract that would yield Seattle a compensatory pick -- if the Seahawks don't nullify that pick with signings of their own. Because the Seahawks currently have $79 million in cap space next year, per OverTheCap, getting that compensatory pick is not guaranteed. The Saints are not rolling in cap space the way the Seahawks are -- and thus would land a compensatory pick for Shaheed -- but they got more draft capital this way than they otherwise would have. Considering New Orleans' 1-8 record, this should have been an easy decision.
    • I thought victory Mondays was pretty standard 
×
×
  • Create New...