Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Is the Dream of one of the top 2 tackles dead?


micnificent28
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Kentucky Panther said:

What a terrible take. You probably complained endlessly about how bad the line was last year. Through free agency and the draft, we have a chance to finally make it decent, even above average. 
 

But no, geniuses like you would rather waste a top 10 pick on quarterbacks who normally wouldn’t be drafted before round 2. Brilliant. 

no, I didn’t, in fact I was more concerned with the poor play coming from the most important position in sports 

i don’t care about having a “decent” OL, I don’t even care about having a DOMINANT MEAN CREW OF HOG MOLLIES.

i care about maximizing value relative to need relative to cost. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One of Icky or Neal will be there, I have a sneaky suspicion. Question is if it’s because of Malik going high or others; I suspect it could be others. If no QB has gone and one of the tackles are there, we’re gonna wait for any/all calls to move down.

I firmly believe Corral, Howell & Ridder are the targets at QB. Penning, Zion and Tyler Smith on the OL. 

Also, a trade target in the mid rounds if we gain any picks is Thayer Munford Jr OL and also Channing Tindall LB

Also—I do believe a few teams have Penning higher than both Cross AND Icky. We may be one of them shhhh.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, micnificent28 said:

The franchise that hasn't had a franchise left tackle since Jordan gross and has been a revolving door at the position since. The only qb with the hope of being a franchise qb is Willis and they seem to be in love with Pickett.

who cares if it’s been a “revolving door”

continuity offers no value at the OT position from season to season. The team would be just as well off buying a high level rental each year.

It’s almost befuddling how people have this weird obsession with a “franchise” left tackle and then work backwards to come up with reasons why it’s appealing despite substantial holes at the most important position on the field

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@GrowlDo u really believe in Willis or Pickett? Or do u just know we need a Qb? Not saying you are one of these people but I’ve noticed some people think drafting a Qb in this draft is the correct thing to do simply cuz we have that need vs. wanting to draft a QB bc they truly are an elite prospect. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Losovoevosseniorcapspeciai said:

I believe I read, and I’m slightly paraphrasing - his time was more “an indictment on his future as a track star than a hall of fame safety.” 
something like that. I think it’s fairly well known safety speed is comprised of reaction and change of direction speeds. 

 Yeah but who are the good ones running 4.7? Darwin James was what 4.4.. the greatest of all time Ed Reed was 4.3-4.4... u think you have to have functional speed when covering was who are now faster than ever... he doesn't seem very twitchy which I mean change of direction.. I had more faith in Simmons than I do Hamilton...

I just know nobody is trying to draft a safety who is already at a undervalued position and ran a slow time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Growl said:

who cares if it’s been a “revolving door”

continuity offers no value at the OT position from season to season. The team would be just as well off buying a high level rental each year.

It’s almost befuddling how people have this weird obsession with a “franchise” left tackle and then work backwards to come up with reasons why it’s appealing despite substantial holes at the most important position on the field

 

 

People who just paid off Matt Kahlil and still have 0 to show for that massive contract and the loss in the super bowl are the reason people care about finding stability at LT. I don't know one successful franchise that has been this bad at the second most important position on offense and had long term success.. I get it lineman are boring but you need them. 

Did you even play the sport?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Growl said:

who cares if it’s been a “revolving door”

continuity offers no value at the OT position from season to season. The team would be just as well off buying a high level rental each year.

It’s almost befuddling how people have this weird obsession with a “franchise” left tackle and then work backwards to come up with reasons why it’s appealing despite substantial holes at the most important position on the field

 

 

Are you 12?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, mc52beast said:

I really don’t see us sitting at 6. We have very little in the way of draft capital and have multiple holes to fill. Expect a trade-down from the trade down king.

Multiple needs in a class that is deep in rounds 2-3 with no picks in rounds 2-3 and a GM who loves trading down. Yeah I think you are right my friend…. Of course that’s assuming we have anyone wanting to trade with us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
    • Jackie, any more reps tomorrow, or is that it for this session?  thanks for the work
    • How can you say they aren’t trying to win now with all the moves made in free agency? Or is trading first round picks the only way to be win now? I’d be fine never trading another first round pick again, win now be damned.
×
×
  • Create New...