Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Is the Dream of one of the top 2 tackles dead?


micnificent28
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Kentucky Panther said:

What a terrible take. You probably complained endlessly about how bad the line was last year. Through free agency and the draft, we have a chance to finally make it decent, even above average. 
 

But no, geniuses like you would rather waste a top 10 pick on quarterbacks who normally wouldn’t be drafted before round 2. Brilliant. 

no, I didn’t, in fact I was more concerned with the poor play coming from the most important position in sports 

i don’t care about having a “decent” OL, I don’t even care about having a DOMINANT MEAN CREW OF HOG MOLLIES.

i care about maximizing value relative to need relative to cost. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One of Icky or Neal will be there, I have a sneaky suspicion. Question is if it’s because of Malik going high or others; I suspect it could be others. If no QB has gone and one of the tackles are there, we’re gonna wait for any/all calls to move down.

I firmly believe Corral, Howell & Ridder are the targets at QB. Penning, Zion and Tyler Smith on the OL. 

Also, a trade target in the mid rounds if we gain any picks is Thayer Munford Jr OL and also Channing Tindall LB

Also—I do believe a few teams have Penning higher than both Cross AND Icky. We may be one of them shhhh.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, micnificent28 said:

The franchise that hasn't had a franchise left tackle since Jordan gross and has been a revolving door at the position since. The only qb with the hope of being a franchise qb is Willis and they seem to be in love with Pickett.

who cares if it’s been a “revolving door”

continuity offers no value at the OT position from season to season. The team would be just as well off buying a high level rental each year.

It’s almost befuddling how people have this weird obsession with a “franchise” left tackle and then work backwards to come up with reasons why it’s appealing despite substantial holes at the most important position on the field

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@GrowlDo u really believe in Willis or Pickett? Or do u just know we need a Qb? Not saying you are one of these people but I’ve noticed some people think drafting a Qb in this draft is the correct thing to do simply cuz we have that need vs. wanting to draft a QB bc they truly are an elite prospect. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Losovoevosseniorcapspeciai said:

I believe I read, and I’m slightly paraphrasing - his time was more “an indictment on his future as a track star than a hall of fame safety.” 
something like that. I think it’s fairly well known safety speed is comprised of reaction and change of direction speeds. 

 Yeah but who are the good ones running 4.7? Darwin James was what 4.4.. the greatest of all time Ed Reed was 4.3-4.4... u think you have to have functional speed when covering was who are now faster than ever... he doesn't seem very twitchy which I mean change of direction.. I had more faith in Simmons than I do Hamilton...

I just know nobody is trying to draft a safety who is already at a undervalued position and ran a slow time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Growl said:

who cares if it’s been a “revolving door”

continuity offers no value at the OT position from season to season. The team would be just as well off buying a high level rental each year.

It’s almost befuddling how people have this weird obsession with a “franchise” left tackle and then work backwards to come up with reasons why it’s appealing despite substantial holes at the most important position on the field

 

 

People who just paid off Matt Kahlil and still have 0 to show for that massive contract and the loss in the super bowl are the reason people care about finding stability at LT. I don't know one successful franchise that has been this bad at the second most important position on offense and had long term success.. I get it lineman are boring but you need them. 

Did you even play the sport?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Growl said:

who cares if it’s been a “revolving door”

continuity offers no value at the OT position from season to season. The team would be just as well off buying a high level rental each year.

It’s almost befuddling how people have this weird obsession with a “franchise” left tackle and then work backwards to come up with reasons why it’s appealing despite substantial holes at the most important position on the field

 

 

Are you 12?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, mc52beast said:

I really don’t see us sitting at 6. We have very little in the way of draft capital and have multiple holes to fill. Expect a trade-down from the trade down king.

Multiple needs in a class that is deep in rounds 2-3 with no picks in rounds 2-3 and a GM who loves trading down. Yeah I think you are right my friend…. Of course that’s assuming we have anyone wanting to trade with us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I feel like this trade just lives rent free in people's heads and keeps morphing into different things. First thing is that the rumored trade was for future firsts. They wouldn't have any extra picks in 2023; the firsts would have been for 2024 and 2025. With very few exceptions, NFL GMs don't value picks that far away. You have to have a lot of job security to pull that off. Like Chiefs, Eagles, Rams kinda stability. That's obviously not the case with David Tepper, especially since he'd just fired his head coach. No GM except for like Howie Roseman is going to trade an asset you have now for a future asset you probably get to use.  Second, at the time you'd have to assume these are first rounders late in the first round. Obviously currency is currency and the panthers need young players, but these weren't slam dunk top ten picks. At the end of the day there's one pick that separates a first and second round pick.  Lastly, the only place that ever reported this trade was the Rams. All the reporters just repeated what McVay said and it became gospel. We have no idea how serious the negotiations were, if they ever really happened, if the offer was real, etc. And I personally believe McVay and Sneed are the kind of guys who would make up rumors like that to fug up other teams, mostly because I assume if I've thought of it someone smarter than me has.  I don't know how you'd call it the greatest draft haul of all time. Firsts quickly lose their value the farther out they are and Burns had 16.5 sacks last season. And anyway those picks would probably just been tossed into the burning inferno of the Bryce trade up so it's a moot point anyway. 
×
×
  • Create New...