Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Official Panthers 30-visits tracker


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, TheSpecialJuan said:

The Panthers have begun a busy week hosting quarterbacks being considered for the upcoming draft. Those scheduled to come to Charlotte are Liberty's Malik Willis, Pittsburgh's Kenny Pickett, Mississippi's Matt Corral, Cincinnati's Desmond Ridder, North Carolina's Sam Howell, Western Kentucky's Bailey Zappe and Nevada's Carson Strong. Two of the first three are considered potential candidates for the No. 6 pick. The team also is hosting the top three tackles this week and next.

- David Newton 

If they don't go qb they better worry about breathing trouble from all the smoke.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, TheSpecialJuan said:

The Panthers have begun a busy week hosting quarterbacks being considered for the upcoming draft. Those scheduled to come to Charlotte are Liberty's Malik Willis, Pittsburgh's Kenny Pickett, Mississippi's Matt Corral, Cincinnati's Desmond Ridder, North Carolina's Sam Howell, Western Kentucky's Bailey Zappe and Nevada's Carson Strong. Two of the first three are considered potential candidates for the No. 6 pick. The team also is hosting the top three tackles this week and next.

- David Newton 

So Excited Reaction GIF

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes!  I like to see that we are looking at RBs.  Why?  I'm not sold on Hubbard.  CMC could get hurt at any time and Foreman is likely a one-year rental.  It wouldn't shock me if CMC stays healthy this year that the Panthers may offload him (his contract mainly) before the 2023 season.  Teams need to see he can play an entire season first before any realistic trade.  Without drafting a RB (or another FA) that would leave Hubbard as the #1 entering 2023 given the chips falls that way, which is unacceptable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, MrBubba said:

If they don't go qb they better worry about breathing trouble from all the smoke.  

I really think that they would ideally like to trade down to get more picks to make up for the lack of a 2nd or 3rd round pick and take a QB later than 6th.

I just wonder what happens if someone trades up to take a QB in front of them? Would they stick to their guns and still trade back or would they panic?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

It sure smells that way.

Agreed. Honestly, taking a RB doesn't make sense otherwise. It would be difficult for a rookie to make the roster with CMC, Foreman, and Hubbard already here and given our lack of draft capital we need to be taking guys who we are very comfortable can make the 53 even with our late rounders.

 

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Agreed. Honestly, taking a RB doesn't make sense otherwise. It would be difficult for a rookie to make the roster with CMC, Foreman, and Hubbard already here and given our lack of draft capital we need to be taking guys who we are very comfortable can make the 53 even with our late rounders.

 

These RBs could be there with our 4th rounder.  Mid-rounds is where the value is this draft for RBs.  Even if we had our 2nd and 3rd rounder, I wouldn't be for drafting a RB with either of them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I did a lot of research on Xavier Legette for the past few weeks, and as some of you know, I was in favor of making him our first pick. I must say that I got tired of going back and forth seemingly every other day about X, and was so ready for the draft to come in order for the team to "put up or shut up" where X was concerned, and enable discussions on X to move forward. X was (is) the most polarizing player discussed on the Huddle in terms pick 33, and that brought a lot of contentious discussion as well as information. See, you never know what to believe during the draft season, and ever since the Senior Bowl, hints and outright stories of the Panthers' and X's mutual attraction appeared and ramped up so easily, that it was almost unbelievable. So, even though I liked X, and really figured that he should be the pick, the ease of which everything fell into place and the outside noise of different analysts made me lose a little conviction. But one ex-scout developed unshakable conviction all the way through.  Dan Kelly, who used to scout for the Jets back in the day, chose Xavier Legette as the top receiver in the 2024 draft class. I came across his thoughts weeks ago, but I'm sharing them now just to give you some positive food for thought since X is indeed a Panther. There is no boom-or-bust aspect to X in Kelly's estimation, as X is reminiscent of a damned good one. "This Gamecocks receiver conjures memories of how Pro Football Hall of Fame wide receiver Art Monk — the former Washington star — ran his routes." "Legette's sudden and spontaneous moves win initial route leverage against corners and then he wins again at route breakpoints." For as critical as some have been of X's release off the line, when I look at X work, I can't say that Kelly is wrong here. X certainly seems to get open (though admittedly sometimes he just out-physicals the DBs ). "Legette is the best in this draft class at "Mossin'" defenders — that is acrobatically outjumping corners for passes and coming down with circus catches. Legette isn't the next Moss, but he is darn good. He can go deep or sell the deep route well before settling back underneath and making those vitally important chain-moving intermediate-level receptions (11-19 yards)." https://www.yardbarker.com/nfl/articles/scouts_view_the_top_receiver_in_the_nfl_draft_isnt_who_you_think/s1_13132_39987216 On Kelly's own site, First Round Mock, he was a little more specific: "Legette has this spontaneous and impulsive ability to put little moves on corners, whether releasing from the line of scrimmage...or...when going deep. Either way, it’s enough to earn Legette route leverage (position advantage against the cornerback he’s matched up against)." There's that term again: route leverage. Say what you want about X, but he knows how to get it. Lastly, within the scouting report, Kelly really mentions the term again without saying it. "Strong target who showed high-level receiving skills beyond his years...Runs routes to get open rather than well-defined routes which makes him tough to cover. Gets to the spot..." That's ironic, no? X in his roughness makes it ugly for defensive backs to cover him. For me, this was an epiphany when I was looking at some of his clips. Yeah, he may not be the technician that a Diontae Johnson or (dare I say) a Ladd McConkey is, but he always seemed to get where he needed to be. He just simply is not built to be bullied or redirected from the task at hand, and I don't think that's a characteristic or talent (if you will) that can be taught. Sure, he'll be polished up as best that the coaches can, and perhaps that will allow him a smoother release. And I'm sure that the coaches will devise ways to scheme him open, but he's built---physically and mentally to get to where he's going. You saw it last season, and you're going to see it in the pros. Watch what I'm saying. https://firstroundmock.com/2024/02/xavier-legette-reminds-former-nfl-scout-of-these-legends/
    • This is from his draft / combine profile from NFL.com.   https://www.nfl.com/prospects/austin-corbett/3200434f-5200-8097-d4cb-2bd53a7e3b55   Overview Corbett won't blow you away with any of his measurables or play traits, but he's solid in most areas. Corbett is definitely sharp enough to move inside to guard or even center and has good technique, but his average to below average play strength and lack of length may be a concern. He has the size and talent to compete for a guard/center spot early on, but he may elevate above an average starter during his career.   Sources Tell Us "He's smart and just solid all the way around. Long time starter in the league. I think he'll end up at center." - AFC offensive line coach
    • Our own PP won't be held to 9% this go round either.... I think the PK was a bit of an anomaly agaist the Isles...  
×
×
  • Create New...