Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Fitterer on trading out of the #6 pick


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

11 minutes ago, Waldo said:

Lol examine them all you want. This guy took a CB over a franchise LT. That is  a lack of skill and understanding of positional value. HAHAHA 

I don’t think Slater is a franchise LT.  He was good last year but he is no Munoz

He is probably better than Icky which is interesting.  Definitely was more proven at this point last year

Edited by Shocker
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Finally someone gets it.   He is going to trade back for pennies on the dollar because he fuged up last year

I don’t think there is another poster on this forum that has less knowledge of football than you.  Why don’t you tell us what you would do genius 

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Pakmeng said:

You suggest passing on a LT in order to take a QB to be so bad we get a high draft pick? 

You need to go outside and get some air. 

It's worked before. Your best bet of landing a legit QB is with a VERY high first round draft pick. So yeah, if #6 overall could get us either a good LT or a spectacularly bad QB, I'll go with option B. We're still a 6-7 win roster with a good LT. That'll be good for a pick in the lower half of the top 10 again. And likely watching those QBs we covet go just out of reach. Again.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Shocker said:

I don’t think there is another poster on this forum that has less knowledge of football than you.  Why don’t you tell us what you would do genius 

Oh it’s an elaborate “tank” on purpose to get Rhule fired and land the top pick to get Stroud. Why go through all of that? If that’s Tepper’s plan he should just fire Rhule now… 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

Oh it’s an elaborate “tank” on purpose to get Rhule fired and land the top pick to get Stroud. Why go through all of that? If that’s Tepper’s plan he should just fire Rhule now… 

Stroud is absolutely the guy next draft but no way in hell we know if we are even possibly in a position to take him.  Just tired of people shooting down every option with no clear idea of reality.  

Edited by Shocker
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Shocker said:

Stroud is absolutely the guy next draft but no way in hell we know of we are even possibly in a position to take him.  Just tired of people shooting down every option with no clear idea of reality.  

We just lost key contributors off an already mediocre defense and we still have Sam Darnold penciled in at starter. Not so sure #1 overall in '23 isn't well within reach.

 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

We just lost key contributors off an already mediocre defense and we still have Sam Darnold penciled in at starter. Not so sure #1 overall in '23 isn't well within reach.

 

No it isn’t…but we can’t bank on it.  This QB deal is depressing man

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If Mays has a market, which it seems he will, he's gone.  I think we bring back Nijman for too much money to be cautious at LT, Corbett comes back cheap since he's already said he wants to live in CLT, and Christensen eventually gets re-signed with the hopes he can be depth at some point.  Draft an OT, draft a C. The OL might be rough for stretches next year, but time to get some youth there to prepare for Bryce in 2027 or the next QB. I still think we compete for the division in 2026 and can go back to the playoffs unlike the oddsmakers in Vegas, but the *real* year is 2027 IMO. Either Bryce has proven it and he's the QB looking at his 2nd contract, or we have the ready-made team for the next rookie QB or Vet we trade for. 
    • The Panthers are going to have a lot more flexibility in free agency than it looks like at first glance. On paper, the cap space might seem tight, but there are several obvious restructure candidates that could easily free up significant room. Between converting base salaries into signing bonuses and spreading cap hits out over future years, Carolina could realistically clear $60–80 million in additional space if they wanted to be aggressive. That kind of flexibility means they’re not stuck. They can extend key young pieces, add help along the offensive line, upgrade the defense, and still be strategic about value signings. Letting Cade Mays test the market makes sense from a leverage standpoint. If he’s willing to come back on a team-friendly deal, great, continuity on the line matters. But if his market price climbs, the Panthers should absolutely explore upgrades. The point is, this front office isn’t boxed in. With cap maneuvering and smart structuring, they have the ability to be active players in free agency rather than sitting on the sidelines like we are used too. 
×
×
  • Create New...