Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Fitterer on trading out of the #6 pick


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

We have very different definitions of "solid". He was terrible last year.

When you're a former top 10 pick traded a year later for a 3rd you ARE a bust. We're trying to rehab him but year one of rehab resulted in quite the relapse.

Is it his fault he was a top 10 pick?  He. Any help where he was chosen.  He’s a tall and long corner with good speed.  They don’t grow on trees, and certainly can’t be judged by a handful of games.  It’s amazing how people on here give some guys a pass for years, yet are ready to discard a player after a few games and label him a bust.  There are so many nfl players who hit their strides year 3+

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Smithers said:

Is it his fault he was a top 10 pick?  He. Any help where he was chosen.  He’s a tall and long corner with good speed.  They don’t grow on trees, and certainly can’t be judged by a handful of games.  It’s amazing how people on here give some guys a pass for years, yet are ready to discard a player after a few games and label him a bust.  There are so many nfl players who hit their strides year 3+

I'll repeat. When you're a top 10 pick and you're traded for much less a year later, you ARE a bust. Josh Rosen is a bust. CJ Henderson is a bust. We hope that we can salvage Henderson's career but early returns don't look good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I'll repeat. When you're a top 10 pick and you're traded for much less a year later, you ARE a bust. Josh Rosen is a bust. CJ Henderson is a bust. We hope that we can salvage Henderson's career but early returns don't look good.

New coach.  New regime.  Personality issues.  That’s what led to his trade.  Not lack of talent.  
 

anyways - we shall see.  I still think he outplays Jackson l.  And if he doesn’t - he was a 3rd round pick for us.  So our expectations shouldn’t be sky high anyways.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

It's worked before. Your best bet of landing a legit QB is with a VERY high first round draft pick. So yeah, if #6 overall could get us either a good LT or a spectacularly bad QB, I'll go with option B. We're still a 6-7 win roster with a good LT. That'll be good for a pick in the lower half of the top 10 again. And likely watching those QBs we covet go just out of reach. Again.

 

 

Then when you do run into your 'Franchise' QB you're still looking for a LT.

Weird take. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Smithers said:

New coach.  New regime.  Personality issues.  That’s what led to his trade.  Not lack of talent.  
 

anyways - we shall see.  I still think he outplays Jackson l.  And if he doesn’t - he was a 3rd round pick for us.  So our expectations shouldn’t be sky high anyways.

A 3rd and starting te

 

It was a bad trade.  But keep spinning 

Edited by mrcompletely11
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, mrcompletely11 said:

A 3rd and starting te

 

It was a bad trade.  But keep spinning 

Meh - Arnold had more fumbles than he did touchdowns (0) and had a measly 400 yards.  So you consider that starting quality but Henderson is a bust?  Biased any?

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/8/2022 at 8:28 PM, LinvilleGorge said:

Adding a top tier LT would complete our transition into the new old Cleveland Browns. We all saw the best LT of his generation suit up for them for a decade while they sucked balls each and every year. 😂

 

At the same time, after drafting Joe Thomas, they spent 3 1st round picks on Qbs over the next 7 years. Those picks: Brady Quinn, Brandon Weeden and Johnny Manziel. So really we'll probably turn ourselves into the old Browns either way.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/8/2022 at 9:30 PM, Shocker said:

You are not as smart a person as Matt Rhule

Actually that bar isn't set really high and probably pretty easily crossed by many in here. And that's not a commentary on how brilliant this community is 

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

IMO if Ike is there you pull the trigger unless you get one hell of an offer and Neal or Cross might be available still. If Ike is gone and Neal is there then, again, it depends on the offer. If Cross is the one left (other 2 are gone) then Its a real mess- cuz I wouldn't want to miss out on a LT, but he's not really the one  I want. I'm not sold on Penning later either, so this would be a tough decision, but I'd probably trade back. It all depends on who's still available and what is offered. I don't think anyone would just be stuck and not consider the possibilities.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If Mays has a market, which it seems he will, he's gone.  I think we bring back Nijman for too much money to be cautious at LT, Corbett comes back cheap since he's already said he wants to live in CLT, and Christensen eventually gets re-signed with the hopes he can be depth at some point.  Draft an OT, draft a C. The OL might be rough for stretches next year, but time to get some youth there to prepare for Bryce in 2027 or the next QB. I still think we compete for the division in 2026 and can go back to the playoffs unlike the oddsmakers in Vegas, but the *real* year is 2027 IMO. Either Bryce has proven it and he's the QB looking at his 2nd contract, or we have the ready-made team for the next rookie QB or Vet we trade for. 
    • The Panthers are going to have a lot more flexibility in free agency than it looks like at first glance. On paper, the cap space might seem tight, but there are several obvious restructure candidates that could easily free up significant room. Between converting base salaries into signing bonuses and spreading cap hits out over future years, Carolina could realistically clear $60–80 million in additional space if they wanted to be aggressive. That kind of flexibility means they’re not stuck. They can extend key young pieces, add help along the offensive line, upgrade the defense, and still be strategic about value signings. Letting Cade Mays test the market makes sense from a leverage standpoint. If he’s willing to come back on a team-friendly deal, great, continuity on the line matters. But if his market price climbs, the Panthers should absolutely explore upgrades. The point is, this front office isn’t boxed in. With cap maneuvering and smart structuring, they have the ability to be active players in free agency rather than sitting on the sidelines like we are used too. 
×
×
  • Create New...