Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

New Pod: Dane Brugler and Austin Gayle join the show


ellis
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, ellis said:

Hey guys. Hope everybody is excited about the draft coming up. We have a doubleheader draft episode for y’all this week.
 

Dane Brugler (Part 1) and Austin Gayle (Part 2). 

About an hour run time, each interview goes about 30 minutes. 

By the way, check out the link below the pod tweet for Dane’s 2022 draft guide. If you don’t subscribe to The Athletic, Dane’s work is well worth it.  

Thanks for listening, I hope you guys enjoyed it! 

“The Beast” Draft Guide link: 

 

Executive summary 🤔 ?

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

I subscribe to The Athletic for the content anyway, but even if I didn't, Brugler's draft guide would be worth the subscription price by itself.

Highly recommend it... 

We talked about it after the show. Dude puts in endless hours on it. Nobody works harder, and it shows. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, ellis said:
1 hour ago, Mr. Scot said:

I subscribe to The Athletic for the content anyway, but even if I didn't, Brugler's draft guide would be worth the subscription price by itself.

Highly recommend it... 

We talked about it after the show. Dude puts in endless hours on it. Nobody works harder, and it shows. 

 

Are you on the record for who the Team will take at #6?

Edited by SizzleBuzz
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No, the casual fan gets sucked into THIS^^^ kind of thinking, and it's so woefully incorrect that it's almost sad. The first is what I've said numerous times, NOTHING about non guaranteed contracts save the billionaire owners a single penny, because they still have to spend their cap floor, and the only reason teams ever don't spend the full limit, is to then roll it over into the next season to be able to spend more that year. But in the end, owners pay the same amount of money no matter what. The reverse is also the same, that the players in totality make the same amount of money as well, because in your example of Clowney not getting that money this year, it will go to another player, as the cap needs to be spent. And you say how we just cut Clowney after we gave him the 2 year contract, but everyone including Clowney's agent and himself, knew when it was signed, that it was more likely to be a 1 year contract than a 2 with how it was structured.  The 2nd year was just to be able to spread out the cap hit and he was always most likely going to end up getting traded or cut. It's why agents and players don't care about the total money in a contract, it's always and only been about the guaranteed money, as the years and overall value are meaningless, always have been, always will be.
    • Agents will have their 1st round picks hold out until the pay structure of their contract is to their liking, not how much money they'll get or even how much is guaranteed, just the when/how they will get the money over the course of the contract. If they're willing to recommend those players hold our, do you really think they won't do it for 2nd rounders to guarantee them an extra 10% of their entire rookie contract?
    • If BY continues to develop.  XL learns how to catch with his speed. Tet lives up to his hype... THEN Brooks comes back.. dammmmmmmmmmmmmm
×
×
  • Create New...