Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Brand


TLGPanthersFan
 Share

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, Malt Liquor said:

If this is true Matt Rhule has single handedly destroyed this franchise. He better win 10 or more games this season or he will be the most hated sports figure in North Carolina and South Carolina history.

Since most root for the Steelers and Packers from SC. Not sure they care. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

People should be cautioned that the Temple heavy guys from his reign are now all in the league, so now his attention will turn to guys he recruited heavily to and for Baylor.  There was a bit of lag but methinks we'll get some Baylor add-ons this year. Pitre, Thornton, Edner, Smith, JT Woods.

I'll go ahead and say Kalon Barnes & Trestan Edner could likely wind up here as UDFAs

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Mr. Scot said:

If it were created by the marketing team, then why haven't we seen it in... you know... marketing?

Why is it that the first time we see it is in a video taken by a draft prospect?

This plus it feels like I've heard Matt Rhule talk about "brand" before.

maybe bc there is more to be designed and unveiled before going outward with marketing.  You always start internally before going outward facing. I work in digital marketing, so I am not pulling poo out of my ass on this one. 
 

It's very possible this could be the begining of the franchise rebrand. That would include, new logo, new uniforms, new slogans, etc. 

"The Brand" could be the core principle that they will design everything around. Im just guessing here of course, bc the only insight I have is the results from the user testing we did for Tepper Sports. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Mr. Scot said:

Would a marketing team come up with a new team slogan on their own?

I have a hard time believing somebody in marketing one day just decided, "Hey, you know what? Let's come up with something to replace 'keep pounding'" 😕

They user test the current slogan and establish persona types they are attempting to bring into the stadium and fandom. It's very likely that the Panthers (along with many other teams in the league) want to appeal to a younger audience. You then create a longer runway for customer stickiness to your product. 

If you attract young fans, then you have fans for 25+ years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TheCasillas said:

maybe bc there is more to be designed and unveiled before going outward with marketing.  You always start internally before going outward facing. I work in digital marketing, so I am not pulling poo out of my ass on this one. 
 

It's very possible this could be the begining of the franchise rebrand. That would include, new logo, new uniforms, new slogans, etc. 

"The Brand" could be the core principle that they will design everything around. Im just guessing here of course, bc the only insight I have is the results from the user testing we did for Tepper Sports. 

If your speculation is correct, then starting off with "The Brand" does not have me excited for a potential new logo or uniforms, etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, travisura said:

If your speculation is correct, then starting off with "The Brand" does not have me excited for a potential new logo or uniforms, etc.

it's possible that it isnt for us, haha. It's potentially for a younger audience. They already have us "old folks" hoooked. I mean poo, most of us have been fans for decades. They arent worried about losing us. They may lose a few, but they wont lose the many of their existing fan base.

Edited by TheCasillas
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hornets shooting has definitely cooled off to end the season 
    • Would be cool if Melo and Kon tied for the season league lead in 3’s.  Either that or Kon straight-up.
    • I love the bottom feeding approach.  Not to say I was the only one, but I was screaming to draft Coker and then screaming to get him in here as an UDFA.  There were criticisms about him, etc.  As a Gamecock baby (Dad was a Tight End for them when I was born) I was against Legette.  I wanted the kid from Georgia.   All that to say this:  I am afraid of drafting a WR (I spent some time today researching) a few of the top names: 1. Jordan Tyson.  MCL, ACL, NHL---he has injured everything he could that ends in "L" and some things not related to his body.  He will drop, and everyone will start getting excited around 15.   NO! take him off the board. 2. KC Concepcion.  I want to like him, but is he not John Metchie III II?  I can't stand drops. To me, the most important characteristic for a receiver is hands.  I do not buy the "He can be taught."  I disagree to a degree.  Catching a football at a high level when you are being hit by someone behind you as you run full speed across the field is more about concentration and focus than anything else. You gotta trust your eyes, your instincts, and your QB.  Hard to teach someone not to fear something that hits you that you cannot see.  Dropping passes gets into your head--that makes you second guess yourself.  if it doesn't, it should.  Either way, it is a mental issue.   3. Omar Cooper.  I like him enough, but at 19? No.  He is a good YAC guy with solid hands.  However, he had a good WR across from him, the best QB in the country, a pretty easy schedule (He had his best games against FCS schools) and I wonder how much of the route tree he ran.  I am torn, not sold.  Of the three just mentioned, he has the worst skillset but I would like him the best as our Z. Who then, do I want, you ask? If it has to be WR, trade back.  If you can't, draft the slow guy who can't get a good release.  1.  Denzel Boston.   If it has to be a WR at 19, I think I would take Denzel Boston.  His biggest criticism is the release (and 40 speed) but he had great hands and runs good routes. as the Z, which is what we need, he would be perfect because he could motion toward the LOS and even when on the LOS, he is off the ball.  Lets do some bottom fishing in Coker Lake: Round 2: Ted Hurst.  He is a model Z WR for this offense.  Drops too many balls to my liking, but as a second rounder, I can tolerate that a bit more than a first rounder.  Round 5: Kendrick Law (UK):  This is the guy I am most comfortable drafting.  His average route at KY was under 4 yards.  He is great at running after the catch.  Stats? don't look at the game stats--look at the measurables. A 42-inch vertical, a 10-foot-8 broad jump, and a 9.60 Relative Athletic Score place him among the most explosive receivers in this class. That kind of lower-body power, paired with his balance through contact and proven ability to generate yards after the catch, gives him a real foundation to develop beyond what Kentucky asked of him. I think they were considering drafting a WR in the first round.  I get it, but as with the tackles in round 1, "Buyer Beware."  I have not given up on XL but I am very concerned that his mind is not right for the NFL. 
×
×
  • Create New...